Cargando…

The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of poorly controlled diabetes and often become infected, termed diabetic foot infection. There have been numerous studies of the microbiology of diabetic foot infection but no meta-analysis has provided a global overview of these data. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macdonald, Katherine E., Boeckh, Sophie, Stacey, Helen J., Jones, Joshua D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7
_version_ 1783735909833768960
author Macdonald, Katherine E.
Boeckh, Sophie
Stacey, Helen J.
Jones, Joshua D.
author_facet Macdonald, Katherine E.
Boeckh, Sophie
Stacey, Helen J.
Jones, Joshua D.
author_sort Macdonald, Katherine E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of poorly controlled diabetes and often become infected, termed diabetic foot infection. There have been numerous studies of the microbiology of diabetic foot infection but no meta-analysis has provided a global overview of these data. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prevalence of bacteria isolated from diabetic foot infections using studies of any design which reported diabetic foot infection culture results. METHODS: The Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and BIOSIS electronic databases were searched for studies published up to 2019 which contained microbiological culture results from at least 10 diabetic foot infection patients. Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and extracted the data. The main outcome was the prevalence of each bacterial genera or species. RESULTS: A total of 112 studies were included, representing 16,159 patients from which 22,198 microbial isolates were obtained. The organism most commonly identified was Staphylococcus aureus, of which 18.0% (95% CI 13.8–22.6%; I(2) = 93.8% [93.0–94.5%]) was MRSA. Other highly prevalent organisms were Pseudomonas spp., E. coli and Enterococcus spp. A correlation was identified between Gross National Income and the prevalence of Gram positive or negative organisms in diabetic foot infections. CONCLUSION: The microbiology of diabetic foot infections is diverse, but S. aureus predominates. The correlation between the prevalence of Gram positive and negative organisms and Gross National Income could reflect differences in healthcare provision and sanitation. This meta-analysis has synthesised multiple datasets to provide a global overview of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections that will help direct the development of novel therapeutics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83511502021-08-09 The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis Macdonald, Katherine E. Boeckh, Sophie Stacey, Helen J. Jones, Joshua D. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of poorly controlled diabetes and often become infected, termed diabetic foot infection. There have been numerous studies of the microbiology of diabetic foot infection but no meta-analysis has provided a global overview of these data. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prevalence of bacteria isolated from diabetic foot infections using studies of any design which reported diabetic foot infection culture results. METHODS: The Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and BIOSIS electronic databases were searched for studies published up to 2019 which contained microbiological culture results from at least 10 diabetic foot infection patients. Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and extracted the data. The main outcome was the prevalence of each bacterial genera or species. RESULTS: A total of 112 studies were included, representing 16,159 patients from which 22,198 microbial isolates were obtained. The organism most commonly identified was Staphylococcus aureus, of which 18.0% (95% CI 13.8–22.6%; I(2) = 93.8% [93.0–94.5%]) was MRSA. Other highly prevalent organisms were Pseudomonas spp., E. coli and Enterococcus spp. A correlation was identified between Gross National Income and the prevalence of Gram positive or negative organisms in diabetic foot infections. CONCLUSION: The microbiology of diabetic foot infections is diverse, but S. aureus predominates. The correlation between the prevalence of Gram positive and negative organisms and Gross National Income could reflect differences in healthcare provision and sanitation. This meta-analysis has synthesised multiple datasets to provide a global overview of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections that will help direct the development of novel therapeutics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7. BioMed Central 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351150/ /pubmed/34372789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Macdonald, Katherine E.
Boeckh, Sophie
Stacey, Helen J.
Jones, Joshua D.
The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis
title The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis
title_full The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis
title_short The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis
title_sort microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7
work_keys_str_mv AT macdonaldkatherinee themicrobiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis
AT boeckhsophie themicrobiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis
AT staceyhelenj themicrobiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis
AT jonesjoshuad themicrobiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis
AT macdonaldkatherinee microbiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis
AT boeckhsophie microbiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis
AT staceyhelenj microbiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis
AT jonesjoshuad microbiologyofdiabeticfootinfectionsametaanalysis