Cargando…

Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training

BACKGROUND: Manual dexterity and visual-spatial ability are considered key to the development of superior laparoscopic skills. Nevertheless, these abilities do not reliably explain all the variance found in the technical performance of surgical trainees. Consequently, we must look beyond these abili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beattie, Kirsty L., Hill, Andrew, Horswill, Mark S., Grove, Philip M., Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08668-8
_version_ 1783735930385858560
author Beattie, Kirsty L.
Hill, Andrew
Horswill, Mark S.
Grove, Philip M.
Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
author_facet Beattie, Kirsty L.
Hill, Andrew
Horswill, Mark S.
Grove, Philip M.
Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
author_sort Beattie, Kirsty L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Manual dexterity and visual-spatial ability are considered key to the development of superior laparoscopic skills. Nevertheless, these abilities do not reliably explain all the variance found in the technical performance of surgical trainees. Consequently, we must look beyond these abilities to improve our understanding of laparoscopic skills and to better identify/develop surgical potential earlier on. PURPOSE: To assess the individual and collective impact of physical, cognitive, visual, and psychological variables on performance during and after basic simulation-based laparoscopic skills training. METHOD: Thirty-four medical students (laparoscopic novices) completed a proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training program (using either a 2D or 3D viewing mode). This was followed by one testing session, a follow-up testing session with new (yet similar) tasks, and a series of physical, cognitive, visual, and psychological measures. RESULTS: The statistical models that best predicted variance in training performance metrics included four variables: viewing mode (2D vs 3D), psychological flexibility, perceived task demands, and manual dexterity (bimanual). In subsequent testing, a model that included viewing mode and manual dexterity (assembly) best predicted performance on the pre-practiced tasks. However, for a highly novel, spatially complex laparoscopic task, performance was best predicted by a model that comprised viewing mode, visual-spatial ability, and perceived task demands. At follow-up, manual dexterity (assembly) alone was the best predictor of performance on new (yet similar) tasks. CONCLUSION: By focussing exclusively on physical/cognitive abilities, we may overlook other important predictors of surgical performance (e.g. psychological variables). The present findings suggest that laparoscopic performance may be more accurately explained through the combined effects of physical, cognitive, visual, and psychological variables. Further, the results suggest that the predictors may change with both task demands and the development of the trainee. This study highlights the key role of psychological skills in overcoming initial training challenges, with far-reaching implications for practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83512362021-08-09 Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training Beattie, Kirsty L. Hill, Andrew Horswill, Mark S. Grove, Philip M. Stevenson, Andrew R. L. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Manual dexterity and visual-spatial ability are considered key to the development of superior laparoscopic skills. Nevertheless, these abilities do not reliably explain all the variance found in the technical performance of surgical trainees. Consequently, we must look beyond these abilities to improve our understanding of laparoscopic skills and to better identify/develop surgical potential earlier on. PURPOSE: To assess the individual and collective impact of physical, cognitive, visual, and psychological variables on performance during and after basic simulation-based laparoscopic skills training. METHOD: Thirty-four medical students (laparoscopic novices) completed a proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training program (using either a 2D or 3D viewing mode). This was followed by one testing session, a follow-up testing session with new (yet similar) tasks, and a series of physical, cognitive, visual, and psychological measures. RESULTS: The statistical models that best predicted variance in training performance metrics included four variables: viewing mode (2D vs 3D), psychological flexibility, perceived task demands, and manual dexterity (bimanual). In subsequent testing, a model that included viewing mode and manual dexterity (assembly) best predicted performance on the pre-practiced tasks. However, for a highly novel, spatially complex laparoscopic task, performance was best predicted by a model that comprised viewing mode, visual-spatial ability, and perceived task demands. At follow-up, manual dexterity (assembly) alone was the best predictor of performance on new (yet similar) tasks. CONCLUSION: By focussing exclusively on physical/cognitive abilities, we may overlook other important predictors of surgical performance (e.g. psychological variables). The present findings suggest that laparoscopic performance may be more accurately explained through the combined effects of physical, cognitive, visual, and psychological variables. Further, the results suggest that the predictors may change with both task demands and the development of the trainee. This study highlights the key role of psychological skills in overcoming initial training challenges, with far-reaching implications for practice. Springer US 2021-08-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8351236/ /pubmed/34370121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08668-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Beattie, Kirsty L.
Hill, Andrew
Horswill, Mark S.
Grove, Philip M.
Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training
title Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training
title_full Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training
title_fullStr Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training
title_full_unstemmed Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training
title_short Aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training
title_sort aptitude and attitude: predictors of performance during and after basic laparoscopic skills training
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08668-8
work_keys_str_mv AT beattiekirstyl aptitudeandattitudepredictorsofperformanceduringandafterbasiclaparoscopicskillstraining
AT hillandrew aptitudeandattitudepredictorsofperformanceduringandafterbasiclaparoscopicskillstraining
AT horswillmarks aptitudeandattitudepredictorsofperformanceduringandafterbasiclaparoscopicskillstraining
AT grovephilipm aptitudeandattitudepredictorsofperformanceduringandafterbasiclaparoscopicskillstraining
AT stevensonandrewrl aptitudeandattitudepredictorsofperformanceduringandafterbasiclaparoscopicskillstraining