Cargando…

Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security

The scientific community has questioned whether reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is possible. Gradually, cases of reinfection have been documented. In Mexico, people with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection have not been officially identified. To allow a retrospective investigation of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santiago-Espinosa, Oscar, Prieto-Torres, María Erandhi, Cabrera-Gaytán, David Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2021.101493
_version_ 1783735938945384448
author Santiago-Espinosa, Oscar
Prieto-Torres, María Erandhi
Cabrera-Gaytán, David Alejandro
author_facet Santiago-Espinosa, Oscar
Prieto-Torres, María Erandhi
Cabrera-Gaytán, David Alejandro
author_sort Santiago-Espinosa, Oscar
collection PubMed
description The scientific community has questioned whether reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is possible. Gradually, cases of reinfection have been documented. In Mexico, people with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection have not been officially identified. To allow a retrospective investigation of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and to identify how reinfected with this virus occurs in a population that requires medical attention. A retrospective search of the epidemiological surveillance system was performed to identify people who met the clinical criteria based on laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and temporality to identify cases of reinfection. Clinical information was collected from clinical records. Seven people with two separate COVID-19 events were identified in medical units in Quintana Roo, Mexico between April and December 2020. The overall median interval between the two events was 156 days (61–191 days). Six people were health workers, and one was a member of the general population. This is one of the first reports of reinfection in health personnel in Mexico, revealing that the frequency of reinfection is low among positive cases and that the interval between infection episodes was three months. There are several scenarios in the natural history of the disease that must be considered based on adequate anamnesis with a clinical-epidemiological approach to determine the correct diagnostic category.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83512712021-08-09 Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security Santiago-Espinosa, Oscar Prieto-Torres, María Erandhi Cabrera-Gaytán, David Alejandro Respir Med Case Rep Case Report The scientific community has questioned whether reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is possible. Gradually, cases of reinfection have been documented. In Mexico, people with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection have not been officially identified. To allow a retrospective investigation of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and to identify how reinfected with this virus occurs in a population that requires medical attention. A retrospective search of the epidemiological surveillance system was performed to identify people who met the clinical criteria based on laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and temporality to identify cases of reinfection. Clinical information was collected from clinical records. Seven people with two separate COVID-19 events were identified in medical units in Quintana Roo, Mexico between April and December 2020. The overall median interval between the two events was 156 days (61–191 days). Six people were health workers, and one was a member of the general population. This is one of the first reports of reinfection in health personnel in Mexico, revealing that the frequency of reinfection is low among positive cases and that the interval between infection episodes was three months. There are several scenarios in the natural history of the disease that must be considered based on adequate anamnesis with a clinical-epidemiological approach to determine the correct diagnostic category. Elsevier 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351271/ /pubmed/34395189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2021.101493 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Santiago-Espinosa, Oscar
Prieto-Torres, María Erandhi
Cabrera-Gaytán, David Alejandro
Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security
title Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security
title_full Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security
title_fullStr Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security
title_short Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security
title_sort laboratory-confirmed sars-cov-2 reinfection in the population treated at social security
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2021.101493
work_keys_str_mv AT santiagoespinosaoscar laboratoryconfirmedsarscov2reinfectioninthepopulationtreatedatsocialsecurity
AT prietotorresmariaerandhi laboratoryconfirmedsarscov2reinfectioninthepopulationtreatedatsocialsecurity
AT cabreragaytandavidalejandro laboratoryconfirmedsarscov2reinfectioninthepopulationtreatedatsocialsecurity