Cargando…
Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative condition associated with old age. Its incidence continues to increase with the rapidly aging population in China. Treatment for LSS usually begins with conservative treatments, as some patients refuse surgical procedures or have surg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05485-1 |
_version_ | 1783735978783932416 |
---|---|
author | Osman, Akram Hu, Wei Jianhua-Sun Li, Jing Luo, Xiao Han, Nianrong Abduhani, Ehsan Liu, Zhenqiang |
author_facet | Osman, Akram Hu, Wei Jianhua-Sun Li, Jing Luo, Xiao Han, Nianrong Abduhani, Ehsan Liu, Zhenqiang |
author_sort | Osman, Akram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative condition associated with old age. Its incidence continues to increase with the rapidly aging population in China. Treatment for LSS usually begins with conservative treatments, as some patients refuse surgical procedures or have surgery contraindications. Caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) and selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) are two commonly used conservative treatments for LSS, which have proven to be effective at relieving LSS symptoms in many studies. However, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing these two procedures. We planned the first study to assess which one of these two procedures is more effective in treating LSS. We will compare the efficacy of these two treatment methods in terms of duration of symptom relief and recurrence rate. We hope our findings will help clinicians choose an optimal treatment for LSS patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct a 1-year randomized controlled trial that will include a total of 76 subjects. They will be randomly divided into two groups: group A (patients will receive CESIs) and group B (patients will receive SNRBs). Two days before the procedure, we will assess these patients using the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. One day, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure, we will assess the condition of these patients again with the NRS and ODI. DISCUSSION: We hope our findings will lay the foundation for the design of further comprehensive studies and help clinicians make a choice between CESIs and SNRBs for LSS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900028038. Registered on 8 December 2019 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8351452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83514522021-08-10 Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Osman, Akram Hu, Wei Jianhua-Sun Li, Jing Luo, Xiao Han, Nianrong Abduhani, Ehsan Liu, Zhenqiang Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative condition associated with old age. Its incidence continues to increase with the rapidly aging population in China. Treatment for LSS usually begins with conservative treatments, as some patients refuse surgical procedures or have surgery contraindications. Caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) and selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) are two commonly used conservative treatments for LSS, which have proven to be effective at relieving LSS symptoms in many studies. However, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing these two procedures. We planned the first study to assess which one of these two procedures is more effective in treating LSS. We will compare the efficacy of these two treatment methods in terms of duration of symptom relief and recurrence rate. We hope our findings will help clinicians choose an optimal treatment for LSS patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct a 1-year randomized controlled trial that will include a total of 76 subjects. They will be randomly divided into two groups: group A (patients will receive CESIs) and group B (patients will receive SNRBs). Two days before the procedure, we will assess these patients using the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. One day, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure, we will assess the condition of these patients again with the NRS and ODI. DISCUSSION: We hope our findings will lay the foundation for the design of further comprehensive studies and help clinicians make a choice between CESIs and SNRBs for LSS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900028038. Registered on 8 December 2019 BioMed Central 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351452/ /pubmed/34372906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05485-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Osman, Akram Hu, Wei Jianhua-Sun Li, Jing Luo, Xiao Han, Nianrong Abduhani, Ehsan Liu, Zhenqiang Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05485-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osmanakram caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huwei caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jianhuasun caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lijing caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luoxiao caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hannianrong caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT abduhaniehsan caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuzhenqiang caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |