Cargando…

Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative condition associated with old age. Its incidence continues to increase with the rapidly aging population in China. Treatment for LSS usually begins with conservative treatments, as some patients refuse surgical procedures or have surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osman, Akram, Hu, Wei, Jianhua-Sun, Li, Jing, Luo, Xiao, Han, Nianrong, Abduhani, Ehsan, Liu, Zhenqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05485-1
_version_ 1783735978783932416
author Osman, Akram
Hu, Wei
Jianhua-Sun
Li, Jing
Luo, Xiao
Han, Nianrong
Abduhani, Ehsan
Liu, Zhenqiang
author_facet Osman, Akram
Hu, Wei
Jianhua-Sun
Li, Jing
Luo, Xiao
Han, Nianrong
Abduhani, Ehsan
Liu, Zhenqiang
author_sort Osman, Akram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative condition associated with old age. Its incidence continues to increase with the rapidly aging population in China. Treatment for LSS usually begins with conservative treatments, as some patients refuse surgical procedures or have surgery contraindications. Caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) and selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) are two commonly used conservative treatments for LSS, which have proven to be effective at relieving LSS symptoms in many studies. However, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing these two procedures. We planned the first study to assess which one of these two procedures is more effective in treating LSS. We will compare the efficacy of these two treatment methods in terms of duration of symptom relief and recurrence rate. We hope our findings will help clinicians choose an optimal treatment for LSS patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct a 1-year randomized controlled trial that will include a total of 76 subjects. They will be randomly divided into two groups: group A (patients will receive CESIs) and group B (patients will receive SNRBs). Two days before the procedure, we will assess these patients using the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. One day, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure, we will assess the condition of these patients again with the NRS and ODI. DISCUSSION: We hope our findings will lay the foundation for the design of further comprehensive studies and help clinicians make a choice between CESIs and SNRBs for LSS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900028038. Registered on 8 December 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83514522021-08-10 Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Osman, Akram Hu, Wei Jianhua-Sun Li, Jing Luo, Xiao Han, Nianrong Abduhani, Ehsan Liu, Zhenqiang Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative condition associated with old age. Its incidence continues to increase with the rapidly aging population in China. Treatment for LSS usually begins with conservative treatments, as some patients refuse surgical procedures or have surgery contraindications. Caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) and selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) are two commonly used conservative treatments for LSS, which have proven to be effective at relieving LSS symptoms in many studies. However, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing these two procedures. We planned the first study to assess which one of these two procedures is more effective in treating LSS. We will compare the efficacy of these two treatment methods in terms of duration of symptom relief and recurrence rate. We hope our findings will help clinicians choose an optimal treatment for LSS patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct a 1-year randomized controlled trial that will include a total of 76 subjects. They will be randomly divided into two groups: group A (patients will receive CESIs) and group B (patients will receive SNRBs). Two days before the procedure, we will assess these patients using the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. One day, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure, we will assess the condition of these patients again with the NRS and ODI. DISCUSSION: We hope our findings will lay the foundation for the design of further comprehensive studies and help clinicians make a choice between CESIs and SNRBs for LSS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900028038. Registered on 8 December 2019 BioMed Central 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351452/ /pubmed/34372906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05485-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Osman, Akram
Hu, Wei
Jianhua-Sun
Li, Jing
Luo, Xiao
Han, Nianrong
Abduhani, Ehsan
Liu, Zhenqiang
Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05485-1
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanakram caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huwei caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jianhuasun caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lijing caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luoxiao caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hannianrong caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abduhaniehsan caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuzhenqiang caudalepiduralsteroidinjectionsversusselectivenerverootblocksforsinglelevellumbarspinalstenosisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial