Cargando…
Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU)
BACKGROUND: Delirium screening instruments (DSIs) should be used to detect delirium, but they only show moderate sensitivity in patients with neurocritical illness. We explored whether, for these patients, DSI validity is impacted by patient-specific covariates. METHODS: Data were prospectively coll...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34374001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01319-9 |
_version_ | 1783736042657939456 |
---|---|
author | Weiss, Björn Paul, Nicolas Spies, Claudia D. Ullrich, Dennis Ansorge, Ingrid Salih, Farid Wolf, Stefan Luetz, Alawi |
author_facet | Weiss, Björn Paul, Nicolas Spies, Claudia D. Ullrich, Dennis Ansorge, Ingrid Salih, Farid Wolf, Stefan Luetz, Alawi |
author_sort | Weiss, Björn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Delirium screening instruments (DSIs) should be used to detect delirium, but they only show moderate sensitivity in patients with neurocritical illness. We explored whether, for these patients, DSI validity is impacted by patient-specific covariates. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected in a single-center quality improvement project. Patients were screened for delirium once daily using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Reference was the daily assessment using criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). In a two-step receiver operating characteristics regression analysis adjusting for repeated measurements, the impact of acute diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), neurosurgical intervention, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and ventilation status on test validity was determined. RESULTS: Of 181 patients screened, 101 went into final analysis. Delirium incidence according to DSM-IV-TR was 29.7%. For the first complete assessment series (CAM-ICU, ICDSC, and DSM-IV-TR), sensitivity for the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC was 73.3% and 66.7%, and specificity was 91.8% and 94.1%, respectively. Consideration of daily repeated measurements increased sensitivity for the CAM-ICU and ICDSC to 75.7% and 73.4%, and specificity to 97.3% and 98.9%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics regression revealed that lower Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale levels significantly impaired validity of the ICDSC (p = 0.029) and the CAM-ICU in its severity scale version (p = 0.004). Neither acute diagnosis of stroke or TIA nor neurosurgical intervention or mechanical ventilation significantly influenced DSI validity. CONCLUSIONS: The CAM-ICU and ICDSC perform well in patients requiring neurocritical care, regardless of the presence of acute stroke, TIA, or neurosurgical interventions. Yet, even very light or moderate sedation can significantly impair DSI performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01319-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8351768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83517682021-08-10 Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU) Weiss, Björn Paul, Nicolas Spies, Claudia D. Ullrich, Dennis Ansorge, Ingrid Salih, Farid Wolf, Stefan Luetz, Alawi Neurocrit Care Original Work BACKGROUND: Delirium screening instruments (DSIs) should be used to detect delirium, but they only show moderate sensitivity in patients with neurocritical illness. We explored whether, for these patients, DSI validity is impacted by patient-specific covariates. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected in a single-center quality improvement project. Patients were screened for delirium once daily using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Reference was the daily assessment using criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). In a two-step receiver operating characteristics regression analysis adjusting for repeated measurements, the impact of acute diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), neurosurgical intervention, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and ventilation status on test validity was determined. RESULTS: Of 181 patients screened, 101 went into final analysis. Delirium incidence according to DSM-IV-TR was 29.7%. For the first complete assessment series (CAM-ICU, ICDSC, and DSM-IV-TR), sensitivity for the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC was 73.3% and 66.7%, and specificity was 91.8% and 94.1%, respectively. Consideration of daily repeated measurements increased sensitivity for the CAM-ICU and ICDSC to 75.7% and 73.4%, and specificity to 97.3% and 98.9%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics regression revealed that lower Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale levels significantly impaired validity of the ICDSC (p = 0.029) and the CAM-ICU in its severity scale version (p = 0.004). Neither acute diagnosis of stroke or TIA nor neurosurgical intervention or mechanical ventilation significantly influenced DSI validity. CONCLUSIONS: The CAM-ICU and ICDSC perform well in patients requiring neurocritical care, regardless of the presence of acute stroke, TIA, or neurosurgical interventions. Yet, even very light or moderate sedation can significantly impair DSI performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01319-9. Springer US 2021-08-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8351768/ /pubmed/34374001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01319-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Work Weiss, Björn Paul, Nicolas Spies, Claudia D. Ullrich, Dennis Ansorge, Ingrid Salih, Farid Wolf, Stefan Luetz, Alawi Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU) |
title | Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU) |
title_full | Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU) |
title_fullStr | Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU) |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU) |
title_short | Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU) |
title_sort | influence of patient-specific covariates on test validity of two delirium screening instruments in neurocritical care patients (demon-icu) |
topic | Original Work |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34374001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01319-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weissbjorn influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu AT paulnicolas influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu AT spiesclaudiad influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu AT ullrichdennis influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu AT ansorgeingrid influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu AT salihfarid influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu AT wolfstefan influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu AT luetzalawi influenceofpatientspecificcovariatesontestvalidityoftwodeliriumscreeninginstrumentsinneurocriticalcarepatientsdemonicu |