Cargando…

The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context

Using visual world eye-tracking, we examined whether adults (N = 58) and children (N = 37; 3;1–6;3) use linguistic focussing devices to help resolve ambiguous pronouns. Participants listened to English dialogues about potential referents of an ambiguous pronoun he. Four conditions provided prosodic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blything, Liam P., Järvikivi, Juhani, Toth, Abigail G., Arnhold, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684639
_version_ 1783736047248605184
author Blything, Liam P.
Järvikivi, Juhani
Toth, Abigail G.
Arnhold, Anja
author_facet Blything, Liam P.
Järvikivi, Juhani
Toth, Abigail G.
Arnhold, Anja
author_sort Blything, Liam P.
collection PubMed
description Using visual world eye-tracking, we examined whether adults (N = 58) and children (N = 37; 3;1–6;3) use linguistic focussing devices to help resolve ambiguous pronouns. Participants listened to English dialogues about potential referents of an ambiguous pronoun he. Four conditions provided prosodic focus marking to the grammatical subject or to the object, which were either additionally it-clefted or not. A reference condition focussed neither the subject nor object. Adult online data revealed that linguistic focussing via prosodic marking enhanced subject preference, and overrode it in the case of object focus, regardless of the presence of clefts. Children’s processing was also influenced by prosodic marking; however, their performance across conditions showed some differences from adults, as well as a complex interaction with both their memory and language skills. Offline interpretations showed no effects of focus in either group, suggesting that while multiple cues are processed, subjecthood and first mention dominate the final interpretation in cases of conflict.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83517912021-08-10 The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context Blything, Liam P. Järvikivi, Juhani Toth, Abigail G. Arnhold, Anja Front Psychol Psychology Using visual world eye-tracking, we examined whether adults (N = 58) and children (N = 37; 3;1–6;3) use linguistic focussing devices to help resolve ambiguous pronouns. Participants listened to English dialogues about potential referents of an ambiguous pronoun he. Four conditions provided prosodic focus marking to the grammatical subject or to the object, which were either additionally it-clefted or not. A reference condition focussed neither the subject nor object. Adult online data revealed that linguistic focussing via prosodic marking enhanced subject preference, and overrode it in the case of object focus, regardless of the presence of clefts. Children’s processing was also influenced by prosodic marking; however, their performance across conditions showed some differences from adults, as well as a complex interaction with both their memory and language skills. Offline interpretations showed no effects of focus in either group, suggesting that while multiple cues are processed, subjecthood and first mention dominate the final interpretation in cases of conflict. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8351791/ /pubmed/34381399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684639 Text en Copyright © 2021 Blything, Järvikivi, Toth and Arnhold. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Blything, Liam P.
Järvikivi, Juhani
Toth, Abigail G.
Arnhold, Anja
The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context
title The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context
title_full The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context
title_fullStr The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context
title_short The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context
title_sort influence of focus marking on pronoun resolution in dialogue context
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684639
work_keys_str_mv AT blythingliamp theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext
AT jarvikivijuhani theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext
AT tothabigailg theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext
AT arnholdanja theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext
AT blythingliamp influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext
AT jarvikivijuhani influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext
AT tothabigailg influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext
AT arnholdanja influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext