Cargando…
The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context
Using visual world eye-tracking, we examined whether adults (N = 58) and children (N = 37; 3;1–6;3) use linguistic focussing devices to help resolve ambiguous pronouns. Participants listened to English dialogues about potential referents of an ambiguous pronoun he. Four conditions provided prosodic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684639 |
_version_ | 1783736047248605184 |
---|---|
author | Blything, Liam P. Järvikivi, Juhani Toth, Abigail G. Arnhold, Anja |
author_facet | Blything, Liam P. Järvikivi, Juhani Toth, Abigail G. Arnhold, Anja |
author_sort | Blything, Liam P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using visual world eye-tracking, we examined whether adults (N = 58) and children (N = 37; 3;1–6;3) use linguistic focussing devices to help resolve ambiguous pronouns. Participants listened to English dialogues about potential referents of an ambiguous pronoun he. Four conditions provided prosodic focus marking to the grammatical subject or to the object, which were either additionally it-clefted or not. A reference condition focussed neither the subject nor object. Adult online data revealed that linguistic focussing via prosodic marking enhanced subject preference, and overrode it in the case of object focus, regardless of the presence of clefts. Children’s processing was also influenced by prosodic marking; however, their performance across conditions showed some differences from adults, as well as a complex interaction with both their memory and language skills. Offline interpretations showed no effects of focus in either group, suggesting that while multiple cues are processed, subjecthood and first mention dominate the final interpretation in cases of conflict. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8351791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83517912021-08-10 The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context Blything, Liam P. Järvikivi, Juhani Toth, Abigail G. Arnhold, Anja Front Psychol Psychology Using visual world eye-tracking, we examined whether adults (N = 58) and children (N = 37; 3;1–6;3) use linguistic focussing devices to help resolve ambiguous pronouns. Participants listened to English dialogues about potential referents of an ambiguous pronoun he. Four conditions provided prosodic focus marking to the grammatical subject or to the object, which were either additionally it-clefted or not. A reference condition focussed neither the subject nor object. Adult online data revealed that linguistic focussing via prosodic marking enhanced subject preference, and overrode it in the case of object focus, regardless of the presence of clefts. Children’s processing was also influenced by prosodic marking; however, their performance across conditions showed some differences from adults, as well as a complex interaction with both their memory and language skills. Offline interpretations showed no effects of focus in either group, suggesting that while multiple cues are processed, subjecthood and first mention dominate the final interpretation in cases of conflict. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8351791/ /pubmed/34381399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684639 Text en Copyright © 2021 Blything, Järvikivi, Toth and Arnhold. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Blything, Liam P. Järvikivi, Juhani Toth, Abigail G. Arnhold, Anja The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context |
title | The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context |
title_full | The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context |
title_short | The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context |
title_sort | influence of focus marking on pronoun resolution in dialogue context |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blythingliamp theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext AT jarvikivijuhani theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext AT tothabigailg theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext AT arnholdanja theinfluenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext AT blythingliamp influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext AT jarvikivijuhani influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext AT tothabigailg influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext AT arnholdanja influenceoffocusmarkingonpronounresolutionindialoguecontext |