Cargando…

Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting

We simulated epidemic projections of a potential COVID-19 outbreak in a residential university population in the United States under varying combinations of asymptomatic tests (5% to 33% per day), transmission rates (2.5% to 14%), and contact rates (1 to 25), to identify the contact rate threshold t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xinmeng, Tatapudi, Hanisha, Corey, George, Gopalappa, Chaitra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255864
_version_ 1783736072633581568
author Zhao, Xinmeng
Tatapudi, Hanisha
Corey, George
Gopalappa, Chaitra
author_facet Zhao, Xinmeng
Tatapudi, Hanisha
Corey, George
Gopalappa, Chaitra
author_sort Zhao, Xinmeng
collection PubMed
description We simulated epidemic projections of a potential COVID-19 outbreak in a residential university population in the United States under varying combinations of asymptomatic tests (5% to 33% per day), transmission rates (2.5% to 14%), and contact rates (1 to 25), to identify the contact rate threshold that, if exceeded, would lead to exponential growth in infections. Using this, we extracted contact rate thresholds among non-essential workers, population size thresholds in the absence of vaccines, and vaccine coverage thresholds. We further stream-lined our analyses to transmission rates of 5 to 8%, to correspond to the reported levels of face-mask-use/physical-distancing during the 2020 pandemic. Our results suggest that, in the absence of vaccines, testing alone without reducing population size would not be sufficient to control an outbreak. If the population size is lowered to 34% (or 44%) of the actual population size to maintain contact rates at 4 (or 7) among non-essential workers, mass tests at 25% (or 33%) per day would help control an outbreak. With the availability of vaccines, the campus can be kept at full population provided at least 95% are vaccinated. If vaccines are partially available such that the coverage is lower than 95%, keeping at full population would require asymptomatic testing, either mass tests at 25% per day if vaccine coverage is at 63–79%, or mass tests at 33% per day if vaccine coverage is at 53–68%. If vaccine coverage is below 53%, to control an outbreak, in addition to mass tests at 33% per day, it would also require lowering the population size to 90%, 75%, and 60%, if vaccine coverage is at 38–53%, 23–38%, and below 23%, respectively. Threshold estimates from this study, interpolated over the range of transmission rates, can collectively help inform campus level preparedness plans for adoption of face mask/physical-distancing, testing, remote instructions, and personnel scheduling, during non-availability or partial-availability of vaccines, in the event of SARS-Cov2-type disease outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83519322021-08-10 Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting Zhao, Xinmeng Tatapudi, Hanisha Corey, George Gopalappa, Chaitra PLoS One Research Article We simulated epidemic projections of a potential COVID-19 outbreak in a residential university population in the United States under varying combinations of asymptomatic tests (5% to 33% per day), transmission rates (2.5% to 14%), and contact rates (1 to 25), to identify the contact rate threshold that, if exceeded, would lead to exponential growth in infections. Using this, we extracted contact rate thresholds among non-essential workers, population size thresholds in the absence of vaccines, and vaccine coverage thresholds. We further stream-lined our analyses to transmission rates of 5 to 8%, to correspond to the reported levels of face-mask-use/physical-distancing during the 2020 pandemic. Our results suggest that, in the absence of vaccines, testing alone without reducing population size would not be sufficient to control an outbreak. If the population size is lowered to 34% (or 44%) of the actual population size to maintain contact rates at 4 (or 7) among non-essential workers, mass tests at 25% (or 33%) per day would help control an outbreak. With the availability of vaccines, the campus can be kept at full population provided at least 95% are vaccinated. If vaccines are partially available such that the coverage is lower than 95%, keeping at full population would require asymptomatic testing, either mass tests at 25% per day if vaccine coverage is at 63–79%, or mass tests at 33% per day if vaccine coverage is at 53–68%. If vaccine coverage is below 53%, to control an outbreak, in addition to mass tests at 33% per day, it would also require lowering the population size to 90%, 75%, and 60%, if vaccine coverage is at 38–53%, 23–38%, and below 23%, respectively. Threshold estimates from this study, interpolated over the range of transmission rates, can collectively help inform campus level preparedness plans for adoption of face mask/physical-distancing, testing, remote instructions, and personnel scheduling, during non-availability or partial-availability of vaccines, in the event of SARS-Cov2-type disease outbreaks. Public Library of Science 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351932/ /pubmed/34370759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255864 Text en © 2021 Zhao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Xinmeng
Tatapudi, Hanisha
Corey, George
Gopalappa, Chaitra
Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting
title Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting
title_full Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting
title_fullStr Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting
title_full_unstemmed Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting
title_short Threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for COVID-19 control in a university setting
title_sort threshold analyses on combinations of testing, population size, and vaccine coverage for covid-19 control in a university setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255864
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxinmeng thresholdanalysesoncombinationsoftestingpopulationsizeandvaccinecoverageforcovid19controlinauniversitysetting
AT tatapudihanisha thresholdanalysesoncombinationsoftestingpopulationsizeandvaccinecoverageforcovid19controlinauniversitysetting
AT coreygeorge thresholdanalysesoncombinationsoftestingpopulationsizeandvaccinecoverageforcovid19controlinauniversitysetting
AT gopalappachaitra thresholdanalysesoncombinationsoftestingpopulationsizeandvaccinecoverageforcovid19controlinauniversitysetting