Cargando…
A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide valuable insights on the impact of a disease or treatment on a patient’s health-related quality of life. In ophthalmology, particularly in dry eye disease (DED) and ocular surface disease (OSD), it is unclear whether the available PRO...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253857 |
_version_ | 1783736074492706816 |
---|---|
author | Recchioni, Alberto Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Cruz-Rivera, Samantha Rauz, Saaeha Slade, Anita |
author_facet | Recchioni, Alberto Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Cruz-Rivera, Samantha Rauz, Saaeha Slade, Anita |
author_sort | Recchioni, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide valuable insights on the impact of a disease or treatment on a patient’s health-related quality of life. In ophthalmology, particularly in dry eye disease (DED) and ocular surface disease (OSD), it is unclear whether the available PROMs were developed using comprehensive guidelines. To address this, we evaluated the methodological quality of studies assessing the psychometric properties of PROMs in DED and OSD [PROSPERO registration number CRD42019142328]. METHODS: Four databases were searched; reference list and citation searching of included studies was also conducted. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to appraise the quality of the studies evaluating the psychometric properties of PROMs used in DED and OSD. RESULTS: The search strategy (S3 Table) retrieved 5,761 records, 573 duplicates were removed, 5,188 abstracts were screened and 127 full-text articles were retrieved for further review. Of these, 118 full-text articles did not meet the eligibility criteria and were excluded. Reference list and citation searching, identified an additional 8 articles bringing the total numbers of papers reviewed to 17. In general, psychometric properties such as content validity, measurement error and structural validity were not assessed by the studies included in this review. Studies reviewing The Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) presented with the highest quality scores together with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of studies evaluating PROMs in DED and OSD was considered using the COSMIN standards. The majority of the studies evaluating PROMs included in this review did not meet the recommended COSMIN criteria and the quality of the PROMs evaluated is not assured. Further evaluation of their psychometric properties is required if these are going to be used in clinical practice or research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8351938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83519382021-08-10 A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases Recchioni, Alberto Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Cruz-Rivera, Samantha Rauz, Saaeha Slade, Anita PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide valuable insights on the impact of a disease or treatment on a patient’s health-related quality of life. In ophthalmology, particularly in dry eye disease (DED) and ocular surface disease (OSD), it is unclear whether the available PROMs were developed using comprehensive guidelines. To address this, we evaluated the methodological quality of studies assessing the psychometric properties of PROMs in DED and OSD [PROSPERO registration number CRD42019142328]. METHODS: Four databases were searched; reference list and citation searching of included studies was also conducted. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to appraise the quality of the studies evaluating the psychometric properties of PROMs used in DED and OSD. RESULTS: The search strategy (S3 Table) retrieved 5,761 records, 573 duplicates were removed, 5,188 abstracts were screened and 127 full-text articles were retrieved for further review. Of these, 118 full-text articles did not meet the eligibility criteria and were excluded. Reference list and citation searching, identified an additional 8 articles bringing the total numbers of papers reviewed to 17. In general, psychometric properties such as content validity, measurement error and structural validity were not assessed by the studies included in this review. Studies reviewing The Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) presented with the highest quality scores together with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of studies evaluating PROMs in DED and OSD was considered using the COSMIN standards. The majority of the studies evaluating PROMs included in this review did not meet the recommended COSMIN criteria and the quality of the PROMs evaluated is not assured. Further evaluation of their psychometric properties is required if these are going to be used in clinical practice or research. Public Library of Science 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351938/ /pubmed/34370748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253857 Text en © 2021 Recchioni et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Recchioni, Alberto Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Cruz-Rivera, Samantha Rauz, Saaeha Slade, Anita A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases |
title | A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases |
title_full | A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases |
title_fullStr | A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases |
title_short | A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases |
title_sort | systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT recchionialberto asystematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT aiyegbusiolalekanlee asystematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT cruzriverasamantha asystematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT rauzsaaeha asystematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT sladeanita asystematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT recchionialberto systematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT aiyegbusiolalekanlee systematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT cruzriverasamantha systematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT rauzsaaeha systematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases AT sladeanita systematicreviewassessingthequalityofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresindryeyediseases |