Cargando…

Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for female...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasheminia, Mohsen, Razavian, Hamid, Khorrami, Ladan, Mosleh, Hamid, Mohamadi, Sanaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429862
_version_ 1783736076958957568
author Hasheminia, Mohsen
Razavian, Hamid
Khorrami, Ladan
Mosleh, Hamid
Mohamadi, Sanaz
author_facet Hasheminia, Mohsen
Razavian, Hamid
Khorrami, Ladan
Mosleh, Hamid
Mohamadi, Sanaz
author_sort Hasheminia, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been prepared by one CBCT machine. The images were evaluated by endodontists and radiologists. Then, the morphology of first molar mesial root canals was assessed by Vertucci classification, and the obtained results were analyzed by SPSS software using a Chi-square test. The comparison was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-four samples (3.13%) had a middle mesial canal. The prevalence rates of the middle mesial canal in the females and males were found to be 9 and 15 (2.35% vs. 3.92%), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = 0.21). Of 24 teeth with middle mesial canal, 17 samples (70.8%) were of Type XII and 7 samples (29.2%) were of Type VIII. There was no statistically significant difference between genders with regard to the prevalence of different types of middle mesial canals (P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the middle mesial canal was rather low in this study, and it is necessary to detect additional canals in the patients under root canal treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83519472021-08-23 Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique Hasheminia, Mohsen Razavian, Hamid Khorrami, Ladan Mosleh, Hamid Mohamadi, Sanaz Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been prepared by one CBCT machine. The images were evaluated by endodontists and radiologists. Then, the morphology of first molar mesial root canals was assessed by Vertucci classification, and the obtained results were analyzed by SPSS software using a Chi-square test. The comparison was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-four samples (3.13%) had a middle mesial canal. The prevalence rates of the middle mesial canal in the females and males were found to be 9 and 15 (2.35% vs. 3.92%), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = 0.21). Of 24 teeth with middle mesial canal, 17 samples (70.8%) were of Type XII and 7 samples (29.2%) were of Type VIII. There was no statistically significant difference between genders with regard to the prevalence of different types of middle mesial canals (P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the middle mesial canal was rather low in this study, and it is necessary to detect additional canals in the patients under root canal treatment. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8351947/ /pubmed/34429862 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hasheminia, Mohsen
Razavian, Hamid
Khorrami, Ladan
Mosleh, Hamid
Mohamadi, Sanaz
Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_full Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_fullStr Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_short Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_sort prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429862
work_keys_str_mv AT hasheminiamohsen prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT razavianhamid prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT khorramiladan prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT moslehhamid prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT mohamadisanaz prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique