Cargando…
Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for female...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429862 |
_version_ | 1783736076958957568 |
---|---|
author | Hasheminia, Mohsen Razavian, Hamid Khorrami, Ladan Mosleh, Hamid Mohamadi, Sanaz |
author_facet | Hasheminia, Mohsen Razavian, Hamid Khorrami, Ladan Mosleh, Hamid Mohamadi, Sanaz |
author_sort | Hasheminia, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been prepared by one CBCT machine. The images were evaluated by endodontists and radiologists. Then, the morphology of first molar mesial root canals was assessed by Vertucci classification, and the obtained results were analyzed by SPSS software using a Chi-square test. The comparison was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-four samples (3.13%) had a middle mesial canal. The prevalence rates of the middle mesial canal in the females and males were found to be 9 and 15 (2.35% vs. 3.92%), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = 0.21). Of 24 teeth with middle mesial canal, 17 samples (70.8%) were of Type XII and 7 samples (29.2%) were of Type VIII. There was no statistically significant difference between genders with regard to the prevalence of different types of middle mesial canals (P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the middle mesial canal was rather low in this study, and it is necessary to detect additional canals in the patients under root canal treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8351947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83519472021-08-23 Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique Hasheminia, Mohsen Razavian, Hamid Khorrami, Ladan Mosleh, Hamid Mohamadi, Sanaz Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been prepared by one CBCT machine. The images were evaluated by endodontists and radiologists. Then, the morphology of first molar mesial root canals was assessed by Vertucci classification, and the obtained results were analyzed by SPSS software using a Chi-square test. The comparison was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-four samples (3.13%) had a middle mesial canal. The prevalence rates of the middle mesial canal in the females and males were found to be 9 and 15 (2.35% vs. 3.92%), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = 0.21). Of 24 teeth with middle mesial canal, 17 samples (70.8%) were of Type XII and 7 samples (29.2%) were of Type VIII. There was no statistically significant difference between genders with regard to the prevalence of different types of middle mesial canals (P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the middle mesial canal was rather low in this study, and it is necessary to detect additional canals in the patients under root canal treatment. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8351947/ /pubmed/34429862 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hasheminia, Mohsen Razavian, Hamid Khorrami, Ladan Mosleh, Hamid Mohamadi, Sanaz Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique |
title | Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique |
title_full | Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique |
title_short | Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique |
title_sort | prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasheminiamohsen prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique AT razavianhamid prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique AT khorramiladan prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique AT moslehhamid prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique AT mohamadisanaz prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique |