Cargando…

Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Background Stump closure is an important stage of laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to establish whether the handmade endoloop or polymeric endoclip method was more effective for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods The study included 76 patients who underwent laparoscopic a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erdoğan, Ahmet, Türkan, Ahmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381657
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16302
_version_ 1783736098084618240
author Erdoğan, Ahmet
Türkan, Ahmet
author_facet Erdoğan, Ahmet
Türkan, Ahmet
author_sort Erdoğan, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description Background Stump closure is an important stage of laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to establish whether the handmade endoloop or polymeric endoclip method was more effective for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods The study included 76 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between October 2017 and January 2019. Patients’ demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and any complications were retrospectively recorded from files. Patients were divided into two groups according to stump closure method as polymeric endoclip and handmade endoloop. Results Among the patients, 59.2% (n = 45) were male and 40.8% (n = 31) were female. For stump closure, the polymeric endoclip method was used in 37 patients (48.7%) and the handmade endoloop method in 39 patients (51.3%). The two groups were not significantly different in terms of age and appendix diameter ( p=0.408, p=0.218). A total of four patients (5.3%) developed wound infection, including three from the handmade endoloop group and one from the polymeric endoclip group. One patient (1.3%) in the polymeric endoclip group developed ileus. The two groups were also not significantly different in terms of complications (p = 1.000). Conclusion We conclude that both stump closure methods are safe, and the more easily accessible handmade endoloop method can be performed reliably in all hospitals, including secondary healthcare facilities such as small hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83520432021-08-10 Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy Erdoğan, Ahmet Türkan, Ahmet Cureus Emergency Medicine Background Stump closure is an important stage of laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to establish whether the handmade endoloop or polymeric endoclip method was more effective for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods The study included 76 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between October 2017 and January 2019. Patients’ demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and any complications were retrospectively recorded from files. Patients were divided into two groups according to stump closure method as polymeric endoclip and handmade endoloop. Results Among the patients, 59.2% (n = 45) were male and 40.8% (n = 31) were female. For stump closure, the polymeric endoclip method was used in 37 patients (48.7%) and the handmade endoloop method in 39 patients (51.3%). The two groups were not significantly different in terms of age and appendix diameter ( p=0.408, p=0.218). A total of four patients (5.3%) developed wound infection, including three from the handmade endoloop group and one from the polymeric endoclip group. One patient (1.3%) in the polymeric endoclip group developed ileus. The two groups were also not significantly different in terms of complications (p = 1.000). Conclusion We conclude that both stump closure methods are safe, and the more easily accessible handmade endoloop method can be performed reliably in all hospitals, including secondary healthcare facilities such as small hospitals. Cureus 2021-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8352043/ /pubmed/34381657 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16302 Text en Copyright © 2021, Erdoğan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Erdoğan, Ahmet
Türkan, Ahmet
Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_full Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_short Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
title_sort comparison of handmade endoloop versus polymeric endoclip for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381657
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16302
work_keys_str_mv AT erdoganahmet comparisonofhandmadeendoloopversuspolymericendoclipforstumpclosureinlaparoscopicappendectomy
AT turkanahmet comparisonofhandmadeendoloopversuspolymericendoclipforstumpclosureinlaparoscopicappendectomy