Cargando…

Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giugliano, Robert P., Gencer, Baris, Wiviott, Stephen D., Park, Jeong-Gun, Fuchs, Charles S., Goessling, Wolfram, Musliner, Thomas A., Tershakovec, Andrew M., Blazing, Michael A., Califf, Robert, Cannon, Christopher P., Braunwald, Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.07.008
_version_ 1783736115084132352
author Giugliano, Robert P.
Gencer, Baris
Wiviott, Stephen D.
Park, Jeong-Gun
Fuchs, Charles S.
Goessling, Wolfram
Musliner, Thomas A.
Tershakovec, Andrew M.
Blazing, Michael A.
Califf, Robert
Cannon, Christopher P.
Braunwald, Eugene
author_facet Giugliano, Robert P.
Gencer, Baris
Wiviott, Stephen D.
Park, Jeong-Gun
Fuchs, Charles S.
Goessling, Wolfram
Musliner, Thomas A.
Tershakovec, Andrew M.
Blazing, Michael A.
Califf, Robert
Cannon, Christopher P.
Braunwald, Eugene
author_sort Giugliano, Robert P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome, we conducted a prospective systematic analysis of malignancy events in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). METHODS: Within IMPROVE-IT, 17,708 patients post–acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either ezetimibe 10 mg or matching placebo on a background of simvastatin 40 mg who took ≥1 dose of the study drug. Suspected tumors (benign and malignant) reported by investigators or identified from a review of adverse events were adjudicated by oncologists without knowledge of drug assignment. The primary malignancy endpoint included new, relapsing, or progressive malignancies (excluding nonmelanotic skin malignancies). The secondary endpoint was death due to malignancy. RESULTS: In this trial, 1,470 patients developed the primary malignancy endpoint during a median 6 years of follow-up. The most common malignancy locations were prostate (18.9%), lung (16.8%), and bladder (8.8%) with no differences by treatment group (p > 0.05 for each location). Kaplan-Meier 7-year rates of malignancies were similar with ezetimibe and placebo (10.2% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 1.14; p = 0.56), as were the rates for malignancy death (3.8% vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.88 to 1.23; p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Among 17,708 patients receiving simvastatin 40 mg daily, those randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg daily had a similar incidence of malignancy and deaths due to malignancy compared with those receiving placebo during a median follow-up of 6 years (96,377 patient-years). (IMPROVE-IT: Examining Outcomes in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Vytorin [Ezetimibe/Simvastatin] vs Simvastatin [P04103]; NCT00202878)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83521262021-08-13 Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT Giugliano, Robert P. Gencer, Baris Wiviott, Stephen D. Park, Jeong-Gun Fuchs, Charles S. Goessling, Wolfram Musliner, Thomas A. Tershakovec, Andrew M. Blazing, Michael A. Califf, Robert Cannon, Christopher P. Braunwald, Eugene JACC CardioOncol Original Research BACKGROUND: An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome, we conducted a prospective systematic analysis of malignancy events in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). METHODS: Within IMPROVE-IT, 17,708 patients post–acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either ezetimibe 10 mg or matching placebo on a background of simvastatin 40 mg who took ≥1 dose of the study drug. Suspected tumors (benign and malignant) reported by investigators or identified from a review of adverse events were adjudicated by oncologists without knowledge of drug assignment. The primary malignancy endpoint included new, relapsing, or progressive malignancies (excluding nonmelanotic skin malignancies). The secondary endpoint was death due to malignancy. RESULTS: In this trial, 1,470 patients developed the primary malignancy endpoint during a median 6 years of follow-up. The most common malignancy locations were prostate (18.9%), lung (16.8%), and bladder (8.8%) with no differences by treatment group (p > 0.05 for each location). Kaplan-Meier 7-year rates of malignancies were similar with ezetimibe and placebo (10.2% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 1.14; p = 0.56), as were the rates for malignancy death (3.8% vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.88 to 1.23; p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Among 17,708 patients receiving simvastatin 40 mg daily, those randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg daily had a similar incidence of malignancy and deaths due to malignancy compared with those receiving placebo during a median follow-up of 6 years (96,377 patient-years). (IMPROVE-IT: Examining Outcomes in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Vytorin [Ezetimibe/Simvastatin] vs Simvastatin [P04103]; NCT00202878) Elsevier 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8352126/ /pubmed/34396246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.07.008 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Giugliano, Robert P.
Gencer, Baris
Wiviott, Stephen D.
Park, Jeong-Gun
Fuchs, Charles S.
Goessling, Wolfram
Musliner, Thomas A.
Tershakovec, Andrew M.
Blazing, Michael A.
Califf, Robert
Cannon, Christopher P.
Braunwald, Eugene
Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT
title Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT
title_full Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT
title_fullStr Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT
title_short Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT
title_sort prospective evaluation of malignancy in 17,708 patients randomized to ezetimibe versus placebo: analysis from improve-it
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.07.008
work_keys_str_mv AT giuglianorobertp prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT gencerbaris prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT wiviottstephend prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT parkjeonggun prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT fuchscharless prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT goesslingwolfram prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT muslinerthomasa prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT tershakovecandrewm prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT blazingmichaela prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT califfrobert prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT cannonchristopherp prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit
AT braunwaldeugene prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit