Cargando…
Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT
BACKGROUND: An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.07.008 |
_version_ | 1783736115084132352 |
---|---|
author | Giugliano, Robert P. Gencer, Baris Wiviott, Stephen D. Park, Jeong-Gun Fuchs, Charles S. Goessling, Wolfram Musliner, Thomas A. Tershakovec, Andrew M. Blazing, Michael A. Califf, Robert Cannon, Christopher P. Braunwald, Eugene |
author_facet | Giugliano, Robert P. Gencer, Baris Wiviott, Stephen D. Park, Jeong-Gun Fuchs, Charles S. Goessling, Wolfram Musliner, Thomas A. Tershakovec, Andrew M. Blazing, Michael A. Califf, Robert Cannon, Christopher P. Braunwald, Eugene |
author_sort | Giugliano, Robert P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome, we conducted a prospective systematic analysis of malignancy events in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). METHODS: Within IMPROVE-IT, 17,708 patients post–acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either ezetimibe 10 mg or matching placebo on a background of simvastatin 40 mg who took ≥1 dose of the study drug. Suspected tumors (benign and malignant) reported by investigators or identified from a review of adverse events were adjudicated by oncologists without knowledge of drug assignment. The primary malignancy endpoint included new, relapsing, or progressive malignancies (excluding nonmelanotic skin malignancies). The secondary endpoint was death due to malignancy. RESULTS: In this trial, 1,470 patients developed the primary malignancy endpoint during a median 6 years of follow-up. The most common malignancy locations were prostate (18.9%), lung (16.8%), and bladder (8.8%) with no differences by treatment group (p > 0.05 for each location). Kaplan-Meier 7-year rates of malignancies were similar with ezetimibe and placebo (10.2% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 1.14; p = 0.56), as were the rates for malignancy death (3.8% vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.88 to 1.23; p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Among 17,708 patients receiving simvastatin 40 mg daily, those randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg daily had a similar incidence of malignancy and deaths due to malignancy compared with those receiving placebo during a median follow-up of 6 years (96,377 patient-years). (IMPROVE-IT: Examining Outcomes in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Vytorin [Ezetimibe/Simvastatin] vs Simvastatin [P04103]; NCT00202878) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8352126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83521262021-08-13 Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT Giugliano, Robert P. Gencer, Baris Wiviott, Stephen D. Park, Jeong-Gun Fuchs, Charles S. Goessling, Wolfram Musliner, Thomas A. Tershakovec, Andrew M. Blazing, Michael A. Califf, Robert Cannon, Christopher P. Braunwald, Eugene JACC CardioOncol Original Research BACKGROUND: An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome, we conducted a prospective systematic analysis of malignancy events in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). METHODS: Within IMPROVE-IT, 17,708 patients post–acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either ezetimibe 10 mg or matching placebo on a background of simvastatin 40 mg who took ≥1 dose of the study drug. Suspected tumors (benign and malignant) reported by investigators or identified from a review of adverse events were adjudicated by oncologists without knowledge of drug assignment. The primary malignancy endpoint included new, relapsing, or progressive malignancies (excluding nonmelanotic skin malignancies). The secondary endpoint was death due to malignancy. RESULTS: In this trial, 1,470 patients developed the primary malignancy endpoint during a median 6 years of follow-up. The most common malignancy locations were prostate (18.9%), lung (16.8%), and bladder (8.8%) with no differences by treatment group (p > 0.05 for each location). Kaplan-Meier 7-year rates of malignancies were similar with ezetimibe and placebo (10.2% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 1.14; p = 0.56), as were the rates for malignancy death (3.8% vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.88 to 1.23; p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Among 17,708 patients receiving simvastatin 40 mg daily, those randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg daily had a similar incidence of malignancy and deaths due to malignancy compared with those receiving placebo during a median follow-up of 6 years (96,377 patient-years). (IMPROVE-IT: Examining Outcomes in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Vytorin [Ezetimibe/Simvastatin] vs Simvastatin [P04103]; NCT00202878) Elsevier 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8352126/ /pubmed/34396246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.07.008 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Giugliano, Robert P. Gencer, Baris Wiviott, Stephen D. Park, Jeong-Gun Fuchs, Charles S. Goessling, Wolfram Musliner, Thomas A. Tershakovec, Andrew M. Blazing, Michael A. Califf, Robert Cannon, Christopher P. Braunwald, Eugene Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT |
title | Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT |
title_full | Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT |
title_fullStr | Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT |
title_short | Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of malignancy in 17,708 patients randomized to ezetimibe versus placebo: analysis from improve-it |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.07.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giuglianorobertp prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT gencerbaris prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT wiviottstephend prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT parkjeonggun prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT fuchscharless prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT goesslingwolfram prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT muslinerthomasa prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT tershakovecandrewm prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT blazingmichaela prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT califfrobert prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT cannonchristopherp prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit AT braunwaldeugene prospectiveevaluationofmalignancyin17708patientsrandomizedtoezetimibeversusplaceboanalysisfromimproveit |