Cargando…

Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process

PURPOSE: Inefficacy and safety concerns are main medications’ problems, especially in the case of poly-therapies, when drug–drug interactions may alter the expected drug disposition. Ongoing efforts are aimed to establish drug selection processes aimed to preemptive evaluation of a plethora of facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borro, Marina, Gentile, Giovanna, Preissner, Sally H, Pomes, Leda Marina, Gohlke, Björn-Oliver, Del Casale, Antonio, Eckert, Andreas, Marchetti, Paolo, Preissner, Saskia, Preissner, Robert, Simmaco, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385834
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S316556
_version_ 1783736224752599040
author Borro, Marina
Gentile, Giovanna
Preissner, Sally H
Pomes, Leda Marina
Gohlke, Björn-Oliver
Del Casale, Antonio
Eckert, Andreas
Marchetti, Paolo
Preissner, Saskia
Preissner, Robert
Simmaco, Maurizio
author_facet Borro, Marina
Gentile, Giovanna
Preissner, Sally H
Pomes, Leda Marina
Gohlke, Björn-Oliver
Del Casale, Antonio
Eckert, Andreas
Marchetti, Paolo
Preissner, Saskia
Preissner, Robert
Simmaco, Maurizio
author_sort Borro, Marina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Inefficacy and safety concerns are main medications’ problems, especially in the case of poly-therapies, when drug–drug interactions may alter the expected drug disposition. Ongoing efforts are aimed to establish drug selection processes aimed to preemptive evaluation of a plethora of factors affecting patient’s specific drug response, including pharmacogenomic markers, in order to minimize prescription of improper medications. In previous years, we established at the University Hospital Sant’Andrea of Rome, Italy, a Precision Medicine Service based on a multi-disciplinary experts’ team. The team is in charge to produce a drug therapy counselling report, including pharmacogenomic, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of this established “manual” process of therapy selection with a novel bioinformatic tool, the Drug-PIN system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorders or a depressive episode in Bipolar Disorder, with at least three previous failed treatments, who underwent pharmacogenomic profiling and therapy counselling in the Sant’Andrea Hospital from 2017 to 2020. The baseline poly-therapy of these patients was re-evaluated and optimized by Drug-PIN. Results of the Drug-PIN poly-therapy evaluation/optimization were compared with the results of the original poly-therapy evaluation/optimization by therapy counselling. To compare the results between the two processes, the risk associated with each poly-therapy was classified as low, moderate, or high. RESULTS: The number of baseline poly-therapies classified in low-, moderate- or high-risk did not change significantly between manual system or Drug-PIN system. As the counselling process, also the Drug-PIN system produces a significant decrease in the predicted treatment-associated risk. CONCLUSION: Drug-PIN substantially replicates the output of the counselling process, allowing a substantial reduction in the time needed for therapy evaluation. Availability of an effective bioinformatic tool for proper drug selection is expected to exponentially increase the actuation of targeted therapy strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83526332021-08-11 Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process Borro, Marina Gentile, Giovanna Preissner, Sally H Pomes, Leda Marina Gohlke, Björn-Oliver Del Casale, Antonio Eckert, Andreas Marchetti, Paolo Preissner, Saskia Preissner, Robert Simmaco, Maurizio Pharmgenomics Pers Med Original Research PURPOSE: Inefficacy and safety concerns are main medications’ problems, especially in the case of poly-therapies, when drug–drug interactions may alter the expected drug disposition. Ongoing efforts are aimed to establish drug selection processes aimed to preemptive evaluation of a plethora of factors affecting patient’s specific drug response, including pharmacogenomic markers, in order to minimize prescription of improper medications. In previous years, we established at the University Hospital Sant’Andrea of Rome, Italy, a Precision Medicine Service based on a multi-disciplinary experts’ team. The team is in charge to produce a drug therapy counselling report, including pharmacogenomic, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of this established “manual” process of therapy selection with a novel bioinformatic tool, the Drug-PIN system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorders or a depressive episode in Bipolar Disorder, with at least three previous failed treatments, who underwent pharmacogenomic profiling and therapy counselling in the Sant’Andrea Hospital from 2017 to 2020. The baseline poly-therapy of these patients was re-evaluated and optimized by Drug-PIN. Results of the Drug-PIN poly-therapy evaluation/optimization were compared with the results of the original poly-therapy evaluation/optimization by therapy counselling. To compare the results between the two processes, the risk associated with each poly-therapy was classified as low, moderate, or high. RESULTS: The number of baseline poly-therapies classified in low-, moderate- or high-risk did not change significantly between manual system or Drug-PIN system. As the counselling process, also the Drug-PIN system produces a significant decrease in the predicted treatment-associated risk. CONCLUSION: Drug-PIN substantially replicates the output of the counselling process, allowing a substantial reduction in the time needed for therapy evaluation. Availability of an effective bioinformatic tool for proper drug selection is expected to exponentially increase the actuation of targeted therapy strategies. Dove 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8352633/ /pubmed/34385834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S316556 Text en © 2021 Borro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Borro, Marina
Gentile, Giovanna
Preissner, Sally H
Pomes, Leda Marina
Gohlke, Björn-Oliver
Del Casale, Antonio
Eckert, Andreas
Marchetti, Paolo
Preissner, Saskia
Preissner, Robert
Simmaco, Maurizio
Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process
title Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process
title_full Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process
title_fullStr Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process
title_full_unstemmed Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process
title_short Individualized Drugs’ Selection by Evaluation of Drug Properties, Pharmacogenomics and Clinical Parameters: Performance of a Bioinformatic Tool Compared to a Clinically Established Counselling Process
title_sort individualized drugs’ selection by evaluation of drug properties, pharmacogenomics and clinical parameters: performance of a bioinformatic tool compared to a clinically established counselling process
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385834
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S316556
work_keys_str_mv AT borromarina individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT gentilegiovanna individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT preissnersallyh individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT pomesledamarina individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT gohlkebjornoliver individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT delcasaleantonio individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT eckertandreas individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT marchettipaolo individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT preissnersaskia individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT preissnerrobert individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess
AT simmacomaurizio individualizeddrugsselectionbyevaluationofdrugpropertiespharmacogenomicsandclinicalparametersperformanceofabioinformatictoolcomparedtoaclinicallyestablishedcounsellingprocess