Cargando…
Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series
BACKGROUND: To compare refractive outcomes after phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation using two different toric calculators for initial astigmatism assessment in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. Patients over 30-year-old who...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385813 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325234 |
_version_ | 1783736226904276992 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yu-Te Lin, Chun-Ju Lai, Chun-Ting Hsia, Ning-Yi Tien, Peng-Tai Bair, Henry Chen, Huan-Sheng Chiang, Chun-Chi Lin, Jane-Ming Chen, Wen-Lu Wu, Wen-Chuan Tsai, Yi-Yu |
author_facet | Huang, Yu-Te Lin, Chun-Ju Lai, Chun-Ting Hsia, Ning-Yi Tien, Peng-Tai Bair, Henry Chen, Huan-Sheng Chiang, Chun-Chi Lin, Jane-Ming Chen, Wen-Lu Wu, Wen-Chuan Tsai, Yi-Yu |
author_sort | Huang, Yu-Te |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare refractive outcomes after phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation using two different toric calculators for initial astigmatism assessment in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. Patients over 30-year-old who underwent phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation (AcrySof(®) Toric IOL) by the same surgeon between 2017 and 2018 were included. Eyes with irregular astigmatism, previous corneal refractive surgery, intraocular surgery, corneal pathology, macular pathology and pupil abnormalities were excluded. IOL toricity was determined by using a calculator provided by the AcrySof Toric calculator before 2018 and Barrett Toric Calculator after 2018. Patient demographics, corneal topography, vector and preoperative and postoperative refraction were collected and analyzed at three months postoperative. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients were included in the final analysis. 0.1D for surgically induced astigmatism was used. Group 1 included 14 eyes assessed with the original (AcrySof) toric IOL calculator, and group 2 included 18 eyes assessed with the Barrett toric IOL calculator. In group 1, postoperative astigmatism less than −1.00D, −0.75 D, and −0.5D was achieved in 88.2%, 76.1% and 53.7% of eyes, respectively, while, in group 2, 89% eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.5D and all eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.75D. The proportion of patients with lower postoperative astigmatism was significantly higher in Group 2 (p< 0.05 by chi-square test), a pattern that still held when we divided patients into multiple groups. Vector analysis with the Alpins methods also supported better outcomes in the Barrett group (0.71 D vs 0.35 D). CONCLUSION: The Barrett Toric calculator resulted in better results in the prediction of residual astigmatism than original (AcrySof) toric calculators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8352642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83526422021-08-11 Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series Huang, Yu-Te Lin, Chun-Ju Lai, Chun-Ting Hsia, Ning-Yi Tien, Peng-Tai Bair, Henry Chen, Huan-Sheng Chiang, Chun-Chi Lin, Jane-Ming Chen, Wen-Lu Wu, Wen-Chuan Tsai, Yi-Yu Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: To compare refractive outcomes after phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation using two different toric calculators for initial astigmatism assessment in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. Patients over 30-year-old who underwent phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation (AcrySof(®) Toric IOL) by the same surgeon between 2017 and 2018 were included. Eyes with irregular astigmatism, previous corneal refractive surgery, intraocular surgery, corneal pathology, macular pathology and pupil abnormalities were excluded. IOL toricity was determined by using a calculator provided by the AcrySof Toric calculator before 2018 and Barrett Toric Calculator after 2018. Patient demographics, corneal topography, vector and preoperative and postoperative refraction were collected and analyzed at three months postoperative. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients were included in the final analysis. 0.1D for surgically induced astigmatism was used. Group 1 included 14 eyes assessed with the original (AcrySof) toric IOL calculator, and group 2 included 18 eyes assessed with the Barrett toric IOL calculator. In group 1, postoperative astigmatism less than −1.00D, −0.75 D, and −0.5D was achieved in 88.2%, 76.1% and 53.7% of eyes, respectively, while, in group 2, 89% eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.5D and all eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.75D. The proportion of patients with lower postoperative astigmatism was significantly higher in Group 2 (p< 0.05 by chi-square test), a pattern that still held when we divided patients into multiple groups. Vector analysis with the Alpins methods also supported better outcomes in the Barrett group (0.71 D vs 0.35 D). CONCLUSION: The Barrett Toric calculator resulted in better results in the prediction of residual astigmatism than original (AcrySof) toric calculators. Dove 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8352642/ /pubmed/34385813 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325234 Text en © 2021 Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Huang, Yu-Te Lin, Chun-Ju Lai, Chun-Ting Hsia, Ning-Yi Tien, Peng-Tai Bair, Henry Chen, Huan-Sheng Chiang, Chun-Chi Lin, Jane-Ming Chen, Wen-Lu Wu, Wen-Chuan Tsai, Yi-Yu Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series |
title | Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series |
title_full | Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series |
title_fullStr | Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series |
title_full_unstemmed | Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series |
title_short | Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series |
title_sort | astigmatism management with astigmatism-correcting intraocular lens using two toric calculators – a comparative case series |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385813 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyute astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT linchunju astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT laichunting astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT hsianingyi astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT tienpengtai astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT bairhenry astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT chenhuansheng astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT chiangchunchi astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT linjaneming astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT chenwenlu astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT wuwenchuan astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries AT tsaiyiyu astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries |