Cargando…

Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series

BACKGROUND: To compare refractive outcomes after phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation using two different toric calculators for initial astigmatism assessment in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. Patients over 30-year-old who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yu-Te, Lin, Chun-Ju, Lai, Chun-Ting, Hsia, Ning-Yi, Tien, Peng-Tai, Bair, Henry, Chen, Huan-Sheng, Chiang, Chun-Chi, Lin, Jane-Ming, Chen, Wen-Lu, Wu, Wen-Chuan, Tsai, Yi-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385813
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325234
_version_ 1783736226904276992
author Huang, Yu-Te
Lin, Chun-Ju
Lai, Chun-Ting
Hsia, Ning-Yi
Tien, Peng-Tai
Bair, Henry
Chen, Huan-Sheng
Chiang, Chun-Chi
Lin, Jane-Ming
Chen, Wen-Lu
Wu, Wen-Chuan
Tsai, Yi-Yu
author_facet Huang, Yu-Te
Lin, Chun-Ju
Lai, Chun-Ting
Hsia, Ning-Yi
Tien, Peng-Tai
Bair, Henry
Chen, Huan-Sheng
Chiang, Chun-Chi
Lin, Jane-Ming
Chen, Wen-Lu
Wu, Wen-Chuan
Tsai, Yi-Yu
author_sort Huang, Yu-Te
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare refractive outcomes after phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation using two different toric calculators for initial astigmatism assessment in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. Patients over 30-year-old who underwent phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation (AcrySof(®) Toric IOL) by the same surgeon between 2017 and 2018 were included. Eyes with irregular astigmatism, previous corneal refractive surgery, intraocular surgery, corneal pathology, macular pathology and pupil abnormalities were excluded. IOL toricity was determined by using a calculator provided by the AcrySof Toric calculator before 2018 and Barrett Toric Calculator after 2018. Patient demographics, corneal topography, vector and preoperative and postoperative refraction were collected and analyzed at three months postoperative. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients were included in the final analysis. 0.1D for surgically induced astigmatism was used. Group 1 included 14 eyes assessed with the original (AcrySof) toric IOL calculator, and group 2 included 18 eyes assessed with the Barrett toric IOL calculator. In group 1, postoperative astigmatism less than −1.00D, −0.75 D, and −0.5D was achieved in 88.2%, 76.1% and 53.7% of eyes, respectively, while, in group 2, 89% eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.5D and all eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.75D. The proportion of patients with lower postoperative astigmatism was significantly higher in Group 2 (p< 0.05 by chi-square test), a pattern that still held when we divided patients into multiple groups. Vector analysis with the Alpins methods also supported better outcomes in the Barrett group (0.71 D vs 0.35 D). CONCLUSION: The Barrett Toric calculator resulted in better results in the prediction of residual astigmatism than original (AcrySof) toric calculators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83526422021-08-11 Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series Huang, Yu-Te Lin, Chun-Ju Lai, Chun-Ting Hsia, Ning-Yi Tien, Peng-Tai Bair, Henry Chen, Huan-Sheng Chiang, Chun-Chi Lin, Jane-Ming Chen, Wen-Lu Wu, Wen-Chuan Tsai, Yi-Yu Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: To compare refractive outcomes after phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation using two different toric calculators for initial astigmatism assessment in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. Patients over 30-year-old who underwent phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation (AcrySof(®) Toric IOL) by the same surgeon between 2017 and 2018 were included. Eyes with irregular astigmatism, previous corneal refractive surgery, intraocular surgery, corneal pathology, macular pathology and pupil abnormalities were excluded. IOL toricity was determined by using a calculator provided by the AcrySof Toric calculator before 2018 and Barrett Toric Calculator after 2018. Patient demographics, corneal topography, vector and preoperative and postoperative refraction were collected and analyzed at three months postoperative. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients were included in the final analysis. 0.1D for surgically induced astigmatism was used. Group 1 included 14 eyes assessed with the original (AcrySof) toric IOL calculator, and group 2 included 18 eyes assessed with the Barrett toric IOL calculator. In group 1, postoperative astigmatism less than −1.00D, −0.75 D, and −0.5D was achieved in 88.2%, 76.1% and 53.7% of eyes, respectively, while, in group 2, 89% eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.5D and all eyes achieved postoperative residual astigmatism less than 0.75D. The proportion of patients with lower postoperative astigmatism was significantly higher in Group 2 (p< 0.05 by chi-square test), a pattern that still held when we divided patients into multiple groups. Vector analysis with the Alpins methods also supported better outcomes in the Barrett group (0.71 D vs 0.35 D). CONCLUSION: The Barrett Toric calculator resulted in better results in the prediction of residual astigmatism than original (AcrySof) toric calculators. Dove 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8352642/ /pubmed/34385813 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325234 Text en © 2021 Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Huang, Yu-Te
Lin, Chun-Ju
Lai, Chun-Ting
Hsia, Ning-Yi
Tien, Peng-Tai
Bair, Henry
Chen, Huan-Sheng
Chiang, Chun-Chi
Lin, Jane-Ming
Chen, Wen-Lu
Wu, Wen-Chuan
Tsai, Yi-Yu
Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series
title Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series
title_full Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series
title_fullStr Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series
title_short Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators – A Comparative Case Series
title_sort astigmatism management with astigmatism-correcting intraocular lens using two toric calculators – a comparative case series
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385813
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325234
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyute astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT linchunju astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT laichunting astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT hsianingyi astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT tienpengtai astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT bairhenry astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT chenhuansheng astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT chiangchunchi astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT linjaneming astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT chenwenlu astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT wuwenchuan astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries
AT tsaiyiyu astigmatismmanagementwithastigmatismcorrectingintraocularlensusingtwotoriccalculatorsacomparativecaseseries