Cargando…

Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine

The Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine is a member of the so-called vector vaccines and uses two different vectors (Ad26 priming and Ad5 boost) to reduce the risk of a reduction in the effectiveness of the vaccination. Real life data indicate an efficacy of the vaccine above 97%. Low cost and no need for ul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cazzola, Mario, Rogliani, Paola, Mazzeo, Filomena, Matera, Maria Gabriella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106569
_version_ 1783736230116065280
author Cazzola, Mario
Rogliani, Paola
Mazzeo, Filomena
Matera, Maria Gabriella
author_facet Cazzola, Mario
Rogliani, Paola
Mazzeo, Filomena
Matera, Maria Gabriella
author_sort Cazzola, Mario
collection PubMed
description The Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine is a member of the so-called vector vaccines and uses two different vectors (Ad26 priming and Ad5 boost) to reduce the risk of a reduction in the effectiveness of the vaccination. Real life data indicate an efficacy of the vaccine above 97%. Low cost and no need for ultra-cold storage temperature temperatures are other pluses of the Sputnik V vaccine. However, there are also several important shortcomings that must be considered such as the possible reduction of its immunogenicity in the presence of very high Ad5 neutralizing antibody titres and the decrease with age of the antibody titres neutralizing the virus. Furthermore, there is emerging documentation that Sputnik V has a reduced neutralizing capacity against the Beta variant and all variants with the spike protein carrying the E484K substitution. Nevertheless, due to its characteristics, Sputnik V could be another useful means of satisfying the need for mass vaccination. However, it is imperative to document the efficacy and safety of the Sputnik V vaccine in individuals with high pre-existing anti-Ad26 and Ad5-neutralizing antibody titres and in those under the age of 18 or older than 60 years and be certain that Sputnik V does not cause the rare development of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. It is hoped that the now widespread use of this vaccine will generate a large pragmatic real-world study with data accessible to anyone interested in verifying them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83526552021-08-10 Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine Cazzola, Mario Rogliani, Paola Mazzeo, Filomena Matera, Maria Gabriella Respir Med Review Article The Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine is a member of the so-called vector vaccines and uses two different vectors (Ad26 priming and Ad5 boost) to reduce the risk of a reduction in the effectiveness of the vaccination. Real life data indicate an efficacy of the vaccine above 97%. Low cost and no need for ultra-cold storage temperature temperatures are other pluses of the Sputnik V vaccine. However, there are also several important shortcomings that must be considered such as the possible reduction of its immunogenicity in the presence of very high Ad5 neutralizing antibody titres and the decrease with age of the antibody titres neutralizing the virus. Furthermore, there is emerging documentation that Sputnik V has a reduced neutralizing capacity against the Beta variant and all variants with the spike protein carrying the E484K substitution. Nevertheless, due to its characteristics, Sputnik V could be another useful means of satisfying the need for mass vaccination. However, it is imperative to document the efficacy and safety of the Sputnik V vaccine in individuals with high pre-existing anti-Ad26 and Ad5-neutralizing antibody titres and in those under the age of 18 or older than 60 years and be certain that Sputnik V does not cause the rare development of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. It is hoped that the now widespread use of this vaccine will generate a large pragmatic real-world study with data accessible to anyone interested in verifying them. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-10 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8352655/ /pubmed/34399368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106569 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cazzola, Mario
Rogliani, Paola
Mazzeo, Filomena
Matera, Maria Gabriella
Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine
title Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine
title_full Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine
title_fullStr Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine
title_short Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine
title_sort controversy surrounding the sputnik v vaccine
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106569
work_keys_str_mv AT cazzolamario controversysurroundingthesputnikvvaccine
AT roglianipaola controversysurroundingthesputnikvvaccine
AT mazzeofilomena controversysurroundingthesputnikvvaccine
AT materamariagabriella controversysurroundingthesputnikvvaccine