Cargando…
Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer
OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.587856 |
_version_ | 1783736250631454720 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Jian-Wei Lu, Jun Xu, Bin-bin Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Lin, Ju-Li Truty, Mark J. Huang, Chang-Ming |
author_facet | Xie, Jian-Wei Lu, Jun Xu, Bin-bin Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Lin, Ju-Li Truty, Mark J. Huang, Chang-Ming |
author_sort | Xie, Jian-Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic, USA and the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Cox regression was used to identify covariates associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to reveal factors predicting tumor regression grading. RESULTS: For patients with TRG 0-1, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 85.2% and 74.5%, respectively, when compared to 56.1% and 44.1% in patients with TRG 2 and 28.2% and 23.0% in patients with TRG 3, respectively (p<0.001). TRGs were independent risk factors for OS. Similar findings were observed in RFS. Multivariable analysis revealed that an oxaliplatin-based regimen (p=0.017) was an independent predictor of TRG. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen for OS (38.4 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.01). Subgroup analyses by histological subtype indicated that the oxaliplatin-based regimen improved the OS in nonsignet ring cell carcinoma compared to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen (53.7 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.011). However, similar findings were not observed in RFS. CONCLUSION: TRG was an independent factor of AGC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. Oxaliplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens improve tumor response and may have an overall survival benefit for patients with nonsignet ring cell carcinoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8352744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83527442021-08-11 Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer Xie, Jian-Wei Lu, Jun Xu, Bin-bin Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Lin, Ju-Li Truty, Mark J. Huang, Chang-Ming Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic, USA and the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Cox regression was used to identify covariates associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to reveal factors predicting tumor regression grading. RESULTS: For patients with TRG 0-1, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 85.2% and 74.5%, respectively, when compared to 56.1% and 44.1% in patients with TRG 2 and 28.2% and 23.0% in patients with TRG 3, respectively (p<0.001). TRGs were independent risk factors for OS. Similar findings were observed in RFS. Multivariable analysis revealed that an oxaliplatin-based regimen (p=0.017) was an independent predictor of TRG. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen for OS (38.4 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.01). Subgroup analyses by histological subtype indicated that the oxaliplatin-based regimen improved the OS in nonsignet ring cell carcinoma compared to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen (53.7 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.011). However, similar findings were not observed in RFS. CONCLUSION: TRG was an independent factor of AGC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. Oxaliplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens improve tumor response and may have an overall survival benefit for patients with nonsignet ring cell carcinoma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8352744/ /pubmed/34386413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.587856 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xie, Lu, Xu, Zheng, Li, Wang, Lin, Chen, Cao, Lin, Tu, Huang, Lin, Truty and Huang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Xie, Jian-Wei Lu, Jun Xu, Bin-bin Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Lin, Ju-Li Truty, Mark J. Huang, Chang-Ming Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer |
title | Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer |
title_full | Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer |
title_short | Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer |
title_sort | prognostic value of tumor regression grading in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.587856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiejianwei prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT lujun prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT xubinbin prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT zhengchaohui prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT liping prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT wangjiabin prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT linjianxian prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT chenqiyue prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT caolonglong prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT linmi prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT turuhong prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT huangzening prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT linjuli prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT trutymarkj prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer AT huangchangming prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer |