Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Jian-Wei, Lu, Jun, Xu, Bin-bin, Zheng, Chao-Hui, Li, Ping, Wang, Jia-Bin, Lin, Jian-Xian, Chen, Qi-Yue, Cao, Long-Long, Lin, Mi, Tu, Ru-Hong, Huang, Ze-Ning, Lin, Ju-Li, Truty, Mark J., Huang, Chang-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.587856
_version_ 1783736250631454720
author Xie, Jian-Wei
Lu, Jun
Xu, Bin-bin
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lin, Jian-Xian
Chen, Qi-Yue
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Lin, Ju-Li
Truty, Mark J.
Huang, Chang-Ming
author_facet Xie, Jian-Wei
Lu, Jun
Xu, Bin-bin
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lin, Jian-Xian
Chen, Qi-Yue
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Lin, Ju-Li
Truty, Mark J.
Huang, Chang-Ming
author_sort Xie, Jian-Wei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic, USA and the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Cox regression was used to identify covariates associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to reveal factors predicting tumor regression grading. RESULTS: For patients with TRG 0-1, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 85.2% and 74.5%, respectively, when compared to 56.1% and 44.1% in patients with TRG 2 and 28.2% and 23.0% in patients with TRG 3, respectively (p<0.001). TRGs were independent risk factors for OS. Similar findings were observed in RFS. Multivariable analysis revealed that an oxaliplatin-based regimen (p=0.017) was an independent predictor of TRG. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen for OS (38.4 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.01). Subgroup analyses by histological subtype indicated that the oxaliplatin-based regimen improved the OS in nonsignet ring cell carcinoma compared to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen (53.7 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.011). However, similar findings were not observed in RFS. CONCLUSION: TRG was an independent factor of AGC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. Oxaliplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens improve tumor response and may have an overall survival benefit for patients with nonsignet ring cell carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83527442021-08-11 Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer Xie, Jian-Wei Lu, Jun Xu, Bin-bin Zheng, Chao-Hui Li, Ping Wang, Jia-Bin Lin, Jian-Xian Chen, Qi-Yue Cao, Long-Long Lin, Mi Tu, Ru-Hong Huang, Ze-Ning Lin, Ju-Li Truty, Mark J. Huang, Chang-Ming Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic, USA and the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Cox regression was used to identify covariates associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to reveal factors predicting tumor regression grading. RESULTS: For patients with TRG 0-1, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 85.2% and 74.5%, respectively, when compared to 56.1% and 44.1% in patients with TRG 2 and 28.2% and 23.0% in patients with TRG 3, respectively (p<0.001). TRGs were independent risk factors for OS. Similar findings were observed in RFS. Multivariable analysis revealed that an oxaliplatin-based regimen (p=0.017) was an independent predictor of TRG. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen for OS (38.4 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.01). Subgroup analyses by histological subtype indicated that the oxaliplatin-based regimen improved the OS in nonsignet ring cell carcinoma compared to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen (53.7 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.011). However, similar findings were not observed in RFS. CONCLUSION: TRG was an independent factor of AGC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. Oxaliplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens improve tumor response and may have an overall survival benefit for patients with nonsignet ring cell carcinoma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8352744/ /pubmed/34386413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.587856 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xie, Lu, Xu, Zheng, Li, Wang, Lin, Chen, Cao, Lin, Tu, Huang, Lin, Truty and Huang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xie, Jian-Wei
Lu, Jun
Xu, Bin-bin
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Li, Ping
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lin, Jian-Xian
Chen, Qi-Yue
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Lin, Ju-Li
Truty, Mark J.
Huang, Chang-Ming
Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_full Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_short Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer
title_sort prognostic value of tumor regression grading in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.587856
work_keys_str_mv AT xiejianwei prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT lujun prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT xubinbin prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT zhengchaohui prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT liping prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT wangjiabin prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT linjianxian prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT chenqiyue prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT caolonglong prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT linmi prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT turuhong prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT huangzening prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT linjuli prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT trutymarkj prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer
AT huangchangming prognosticvalueoftumorregressiongradinginpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyplussurgeryforgastriccancer