Cargando…
Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful?
OBJECTIVE: To report the experience of a routine follow-up program based on medical visits and chest CT. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving patients followed after complete surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer between April of 2007 and December of 2015. The follow-up progr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406226 http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20210025 |
_version_ | 1783736255371018240 |
---|---|
author | Morellato, Juliana B F Guimarães, Marcos D Medeiros, Maria L L Carneiro, Hélio A Oliveira, Alex D Medici, João P O Baranauskas, Marcus V B Gross, Jefferson L |
author_facet | Morellato, Juliana B F Guimarães, Marcos D Medeiros, Maria L L Carneiro, Hélio A Oliveira, Alex D Medici, João P O Baranauskas, Marcus V B Gross, Jefferson L |
author_sort | Morellato, Juliana B F |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To report the experience of a routine follow-up program based on medical visits and chest CT. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving patients followed after complete surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer between April of 2007 and December of 2015. The follow-up program consisted of clinical examination and chest CT. Each follow-up visit was classified as a routine or non-routine consultation, and patients were considered symptomatic or asymptomatic. The outcomes of the follow-up program were no evidence of cancer, recurrence, or second primary lung cancer. RESULTS: The sample comprised 148 patients. The median time of follow-up was 40.1 months, and 74.3% of the patients underwent fewer chest CTs than those recommended in our follow-up program. Recurrence and second primary lung cancer were found in 17.6% and 11.5% of the patients, respectively. Recurrence was diagnosed in a routine medical consultation in 69.2% of the cases, 57.7% of the patients being asymptomatic. Second primary lung cancer was diagnosed in a routine medical appointment in 94.1% of the cases, 88.2% of the patients being asymptomatic. Of the 53 patients who presented with abnormalities on chest CT, 41 (77.3%) were diagnosed with cancer. CONCLUSION: Most of the cases of recurrence, especially those of second primary lung cancer, were confirmed by chest CT in asymptomatic patients, indicating the importance of a strict follow-up program that includes chest CTs after surgical resection of lung cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8352764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83527642021-08-13 Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful? Morellato, Juliana B F Guimarães, Marcos D Medeiros, Maria L L Carneiro, Hélio A Oliveira, Alex D Medici, João P O Baranauskas, Marcus V B Gross, Jefferson L J Bras Pneumol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To report the experience of a routine follow-up program based on medical visits and chest CT. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving patients followed after complete surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer between April of 2007 and December of 2015. The follow-up program consisted of clinical examination and chest CT. Each follow-up visit was classified as a routine or non-routine consultation, and patients were considered symptomatic or asymptomatic. The outcomes of the follow-up program were no evidence of cancer, recurrence, or second primary lung cancer. RESULTS: The sample comprised 148 patients. The median time of follow-up was 40.1 months, and 74.3% of the patients underwent fewer chest CTs than those recommended in our follow-up program. Recurrence and second primary lung cancer were found in 17.6% and 11.5% of the patients, respectively. Recurrence was diagnosed in a routine medical consultation in 69.2% of the cases, 57.7% of the patients being asymptomatic. Second primary lung cancer was diagnosed in a routine medical appointment in 94.1% of the cases, 88.2% of the patients being asymptomatic. Of the 53 patients who presented with abnormalities on chest CT, 41 (77.3%) were diagnosed with cancer. CONCLUSION: Most of the cases of recurrence, especially those of second primary lung cancer, were confirmed by chest CT in asymptomatic patients, indicating the importance of a strict follow-up program that includes chest CTs after surgical resection of lung cancer. Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8352764/ /pubmed/34406226 http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20210025 Text en © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Morellato, Juliana B F Guimarães, Marcos D Medeiros, Maria L L Carneiro, Hélio A Oliveira, Alex D Medici, João P O Baranauskas, Marcus V B Gross, Jefferson L Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful? |
title | Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful? |
title_full | Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful? |
title_fullStr | Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful? |
title_full_unstemmed | Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful? |
title_short | Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful? |
title_sort | routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest ct useful? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406226 http://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20210025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morellatojulianabf routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful AT guimaraesmarcosd routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful AT medeirosmariall routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful AT carneirohelioa routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful AT oliveiraalexd routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful AT medicijoaopo routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful AT baranauskasmarcusvb routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful AT grossjeffersonl routinefollowupaftersurgicaltreatmentoflungcancerischestctuseful |