Cargando…
Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images
Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide with a mortality rate of 60%. Cervical cancer begins with no overt signs and has a long latent period, making early detection through regular checkups vitally immportant. In this study, we compare the performance of two different mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95748-3 |
_version_ | 1783736281235193856 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ye Rang Kim, Young Jae Ju, Woong Nam, Kyehyun Kim, Soonyung Kim, Kwang Gi |
author_facet | Park, Ye Rang Kim, Young Jae Ju, Woong Nam, Kyehyun Kim, Soonyung Kim, Kwang Gi |
author_sort | Park, Ye Rang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide with a mortality rate of 60%. Cervical cancer begins with no overt signs and has a long latent period, making early detection through regular checkups vitally immportant. In this study, we compare the performance of two different models, machine learning and deep learning, for the purpose of identifying signs of cervical cancer using cervicography images. Using the deep learning model ResNet-50 and the machine learning models XGB, SVM, and RF, we classified 4119 Cervicography images as positive or negative for cervical cancer using square images in which the vaginal wall regions were removed. The machine learning models extracted 10 major features from a total of 300 features. All tests were validated by fivefold cross-validation and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis yielded the following AUCs: ResNet-50 0.97(CI 95% 0.949–0.976), XGB 0.82(CI 95% 0.797–0.851), SVM 0.84(CI 95% 0.801–0.854), RF 0.79(CI 95% 0.804–0.856). The ResNet-50 model showed a 0.15 point improvement (p < 0.05) over the average (0.82) of the three machine learning methods. Our data suggest that the ResNet-50 deep learning algorithm could offer greater performance than current machine learning models for the purpose of identifying cervical cancer using cervicography images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8352876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83528762021-08-10 Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images Park, Ye Rang Kim, Young Jae Ju, Woong Nam, Kyehyun Kim, Soonyung Kim, Kwang Gi Sci Rep Article Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide with a mortality rate of 60%. Cervical cancer begins with no overt signs and has a long latent period, making early detection through regular checkups vitally immportant. In this study, we compare the performance of two different models, machine learning and deep learning, for the purpose of identifying signs of cervical cancer using cervicography images. Using the deep learning model ResNet-50 and the machine learning models XGB, SVM, and RF, we classified 4119 Cervicography images as positive or negative for cervical cancer using square images in which the vaginal wall regions were removed. The machine learning models extracted 10 major features from a total of 300 features. All tests were validated by fivefold cross-validation and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis yielded the following AUCs: ResNet-50 0.97(CI 95% 0.949–0.976), XGB 0.82(CI 95% 0.797–0.851), SVM 0.84(CI 95% 0.801–0.854), RF 0.79(CI 95% 0.804–0.856). The ResNet-50 model showed a 0.15 point improvement (p < 0.05) over the average (0.82) of the three machine learning methods. Our data suggest that the ResNet-50 deep learning algorithm could offer greater performance than current machine learning models for the purpose of identifying cervical cancer using cervicography images. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8352876/ /pubmed/34373589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95748-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Park, Ye Rang Kim, Young Jae Ju, Woong Nam, Kyehyun Kim, Soonyung Kim, Kwang Gi Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images |
title | Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images |
title_full | Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images |
title_fullStr | Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images |
title_short | Comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images |
title_sort | comparison of machine and deep learning for the classification of cervical cancer based on cervicography images |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95748-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkyerang comparisonofmachineanddeeplearningfortheclassificationofcervicalcancerbasedoncervicographyimages AT kimyoungjae comparisonofmachineanddeeplearningfortheclassificationofcervicalcancerbasedoncervicographyimages AT juwoong comparisonofmachineanddeeplearningfortheclassificationofcervicalcancerbasedoncervicographyimages AT namkyehyun comparisonofmachineanddeeplearningfortheclassificationofcervicalcancerbasedoncervicographyimages AT kimsoonyung comparisonofmachineanddeeplearningfortheclassificationofcervicalcancerbasedoncervicographyimages AT kimkwanggi comparisonofmachineanddeeplearningfortheclassificationofcervicalcancerbasedoncervicographyimages |