Cargando…

Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest

To compare the effect on the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of early endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and expiratory real-time tidal volume (VTe) feedback (TVF) ventilation versus without feedback or standard ventilation (SV) in a pediatric animal model of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manrique, Gema, Pérez, Gema, Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura, García, Miriam, Slöcker, María, González, Rafael, Herrera, Laura, Mencía, Santiago, del Castillo, Jimena, Solana, María José, Sanz, Débora, Cieza, Raquel, Fernández, Sarah N., López, Jorge, Urbano, Javier, López-Herce, Jesús
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95296-w
_version_ 1783736307054280704
author Manrique, Gema
Pérez, Gema
Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura
García, Miriam
Slöcker, María
González, Rafael
Herrera, Laura
Mencía, Santiago
del Castillo, Jimena
Solana, María José
Sanz, Débora
Cieza, Raquel
Fernández, Sarah N.
López, Jorge
Urbano, Javier
López-Herce, Jesús
author_facet Manrique, Gema
Pérez, Gema
Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura
García, Miriam
Slöcker, María
González, Rafael
Herrera, Laura
Mencía, Santiago
del Castillo, Jimena
Solana, María José
Sanz, Débora
Cieza, Raquel
Fernández, Sarah N.
López, Jorge
Urbano, Javier
López-Herce, Jesús
author_sort Manrique, Gema
collection PubMed
description To compare the effect on the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of early endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and expiratory real-time tidal volume (VTe) feedback (TVF) ventilation versus without feedback or standard ventilation (SV) in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomized into five groups: 1: ETI and TVF ventilation (10 ml/kg); 2: ETI and TVF (7 ml/kg); 3: ETI and SV; 4: BMV and TVF (10 ml/kg) and 5: BMV and SV. Thirty breaths-per-minute guided by metronome were given. ROSC, pCO2, pO2, EtCO2 and VTe were compared among groups. Seventy-nine piglets (11.3 ± 1.2 kg) were included. Twenty-six (32.9%) achieved ROSC. Survival was non-significantly higher in ETI (40.4%) than BMV groups (21.9%), p = 0.08. No differences in ROSC were found between TVF and SV groups (30.0% versus 34.7%, p = 0.67). ETI groups presented lower pCO2, and higher pO2, EtCO2 and VTe than BMV groups (p < 0.05). VTe was lower in TVF than in SV groups and in BMV than in ETI groups (p < 0.05). Groups 1 and 3 showed higher pO2 and lower pCO2 over time, although with hyperventilation values (pCO2 < 35 mmHg). ETI groups had non significantly higher survival rate than BMV groups. Compared to BMV groups, ETI groups achieved better oxygenation and ventilation parameters. VTe was lower in both TVF and BMV groups. Hyperventilation was observed in intubated animals with SV and with 10 ml/kg VTF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8352976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83529762021-08-11 Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest Manrique, Gema Pérez, Gema Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura García, Miriam Slöcker, María González, Rafael Herrera, Laura Mencía, Santiago del Castillo, Jimena Solana, María José Sanz, Débora Cieza, Raquel Fernández, Sarah N. López, Jorge Urbano, Javier López-Herce, Jesús Sci Rep Article To compare the effect on the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of early endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and expiratory real-time tidal volume (VTe) feedback (TVF) ventilation versus without feedback or standard ventilation (SV) in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomized into five groups: 1: ETI and TVF ventilation (10 ml/kg); 2: ETI and TVF (7 ml/kg); 3: ETI and SV; 4: BMV and TVF (10 ml/kg) and 5: BMV and SV. Thirty breaths-per-minute guided by metronome were given. ROSC, pCO2, pO2, EtCO2 and VTe were compared among groups. Seventy-nine piglets (11.3 ± 1.2 kg) were included. Twenty-six (32.9%) achieved ROSC. Survival was non-significantly higher in ETI (40.4%) than BMV groups (21.9%), p = 0.08. No differences in ROSC were found between TVF and SV groups (30.0% versus 34.7%, p = 0.67). ETI groups presented lower pCO2, and higher pO2, EtCO2 and VTe than BMV groups (p < 0.05). VTe was lower in TVF than in SV groups and in BMV than in ETI groups (p < 0.05). Groups 1 and 3 showed higher pO2 and lower pCO2 over time, although with hyperventilation values (pCO2 < 35 mmHg). ETI groups had non significantly higher survival rate than BMV groups. Compared to BMV groups, ETI groups achieved better oxygenation and ventilation parameters. VTe was lower in both TVF and BMV groups. Hyperventilation was observed in intubated animals with SV and with 10 ml/kg VTF. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8352976/ /pubmed/34373497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95296-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Manrique, Gema
Pérez, Gema
Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura
García, Miriam
Slöcker, María
González, Rafael
Herrera, Laura
Mencía, Santiago
del Castillo, Jimena
Solana, María José
Sanz, Débora
Cieza, Raquel
Fernández, Sarah N.
López, Jorge
Urbano, Javier
López-Herce, Jesús
Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
title Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
title_full Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
title_fullStr Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
title_full_unstemmed Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
title_short Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
title_sort effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95296-w
work_keys_str_mv AT manriquegema effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT perezgema effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT butraguenolaisecalaura effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT garciamiriam effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT slockermaria effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT gonzalezrafael effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT herreralaura effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT menciasantiago effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT delcastillojimena effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT solanamariajose effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT sanzdebora effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT ciezaraquel effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT fernandezsarahn effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT lopezjorge effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT urbanojavier effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest
AT lopezhercejesus effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest