Cargando…
Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest
To compare the effect on the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of early endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and expiratory real-time tidal volume (VTe) feedback (TVF) ventilation versus without feedback or standard ventilation (SV) in a pediatric animal model of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95296-w |
_version_ | 1783736307054280704 |
---|---|
author | Manrique, Gema Pérez, Gema Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura García, Miriam Slöcker, María González, Rafael Herrera, Laura Mencía, Santiago del Castillo, Jimena Solana, María José Sanz, Débora Cieza, Raquel Fernández, Sarah N. López, Jorge Urbano, Javier López-Herce, Jesús |
author_facet | Manrique, Gema Pérez, Gema Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura García, Miriam Slöcker, María González, Rafael Herrera, Laura Mencía, Santiago del Castillo, Jimena Solana, María José Sanz, Débora Cieza, Raquel Fernández, Sarah N. López, Jorge Urbano, Javier López-Herce, Jesús |
author_sort | Manrique, Gema |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the effect on the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of early endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and expiratory real-time tidal volume (VTe) feedback (TVF) ventilation versus without feedback or standard ventilation (SV) in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomized into five groups: 1: ETI and TVF ventilation (10 ml/kg); 2: ETI and TVF (7 ml/kg); 3: ETI and SV; 4: BMV and TVF (10 ml/kg) and 5: BMV and SV. Thirty breaths-per-minute guided by metronome were given. ROSC, pCO2, pO2, EtCO2 and VTe were compared among groups. Seventy-nine piglets (11.3 ± 1.2 kg) were included. Twenty-six (32.9%) achieved ROSC. Survival was non-significantly higher in ETI (40.4%) than BMV groups (21.9%), p = 0.08. No differences in ROSC were found between TVF and SV groups (30.0% versus 34.7%, p = 0.67). ETI groups presented lower pCO2, and higher pO2, EtCO2 and VTe than BMV groups (p < 0.05). VTe was lower in TVF than in SV groups and in BMV than in ETI groups (p < 0.05). Groups 1 and 3 showed higher pO2 and lower pCO2 over time, although with hyperventilation values (pCO2 < 35 mmHg). ETI groups had non significantly higher survival rate than BMV groups. Compared to BMV groups, ETI groups achieved better oxygenation and ventilation parameters. VTe was lower in both TVF and BMV groups. Hyperventilation was observed in intubated animals with SV and with 10 ml/kg VTF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8352976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83529762021-08-11 Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest Manrique, Gema Pérez, Gema Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura García, Miriam Slöcker, María González, Rafael Herrera, Laura Mencía, Santiago del Castillo, Jimena Solana, María José Sanz, Débora Cieza, Raquel Fernández, Sarah N. López, Jorge Urbano, Javier López-Herce, Jesús Sci Rep Article To compare the effect on the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of early endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and expiratory real-time tidal volume (VTe) feedback (TVF) ventilation versus without feedback or standard ventilation (SV) in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomized into five groups: 1: ETI and TVF ventilation (10 ml/kg); 2: ETI and TVF (7 ml/kg); 3: ETI and SV; 4: BMV and TVF (10 ml/kg) and 5: BMV and SV. Thirty breaths-per-minute guided by metronome were given. ROSC, pCO2, pO2, EtCO2 and VTe were compared among groups. Seventy-nine piglets (11.3 ± 1.2 kg) were included. Twenty-six (32.9%) achieved ROSC. Survival was non-significantly higher in ETI (40.4%) than BMV groups (21.9%), p = 0.08. No differences in ROSC were found between TVF and SV groups (30.0% versus 34.7%, p = 0.67). ETI groups presented lower pCO2, and higher pO2, EtCO2 and VTe than BMV groups (p < 0.05). VTe was lower in TVF than in SV groups and in BMV than in ETI groups (p < 0.05). Groups 1 and 3 showed higher pO2 and lower pCO2 over time, although with hyperventilation values (pCO2 < 35 mmHg). ETI groups had non significantly higher survival rate than BMV groups. Compared to BMV groups, ETI groups achieved better oxygenation and ventilation parameters. VTe was lower in both TVF and BMV groups. Hyperventilation was observed in intubated animals with SV and with 10 ml/kg VTF. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8352976/ /pubmed/34373497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95296-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Manrique, Gema Pérez, Gema Butragueño-Laiseca, Laura García, Miriam Slöcker, María González, Rafael Herrera, Laura Mencía, Santiago del Castillo, Jimena Solana, María José Sanz, Débora Cieza, Raquel Fernández, Sarah N. López, Jorge Urbano, Javier López-Herce, Jesús Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest |
title | Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest |
title_full | Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest |
title_fullStr | Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest |
title_short | Effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest |
title_sort | effects of airway management and tidal volume feedback ventilation during pediatric resuscitation in piglets with asphyxial cardiac arrest |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8352976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95296-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manriquegema effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT perezgema effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT butraguenolaisecalaura effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT garciamiriam effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT slockermaria effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT gonzalezrafael effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT herreralaura effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT menciasantiago effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT delcastillojimena effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT solanamariajose effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT sanzdebora effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT ciezaraquel effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT fernandezsarahn effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT lopezjorge effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT urbanojavier effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest AT lopezhercejesus effectsofairwaymanagementandtidalvolumefeedbackventilationduringpediatricresuscitationinpigletswithasphyxialcardiacarrest |