Cargando…

Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical utility of tactile somatosensory assessments to assist clinicians in diagnosing sport-related mild traumatic brain injury (SR-mTBI), classifying recovery trajectory based on performance at initial clinical assessment, and determining if neurophysiological recover...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGeown, Joshua P., Hume, Patria A., Kara, Stephen, King, Doug, Theadom, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00340-8
_version_ 1783736316161163264
author McGeown, Joshua P.
Hume, Patria A.
Kara, Stephen
King, Doug
Theadom, Alice
author_facet McGeown, Joshua P.
Hume, Patria A.
Kara, Stephen
King, Doug
Theadom, Alice
author_sort McGeown, Joshua P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical utility of tactile somatosensory assessments to assist clinicians in diagnosing sport-related mild traumatic brain injury (SR-mTBI), classifying recovery trajectory based on performance at initial clinical assessment, and determining if neurophysiological recovery coincided with clinical recovery. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with normative controls. METHODS: At admission (n = 79) and discharge (n = 45/79), SR-mTBI patients completed the SCAT-5 symptom scale, along with the following three components from the Cortical Metrics Brain Gauge somatosensory assessment (BG-SA): temporal order judgement (TOJ), TOJ with confounding condition (TOJc), and duration discrimination (DUR). To assist SR-mTBI diagnosis on admission, BG-SA performance was used in logistic regression to discriminate cases belonging to the SR-mTBI sample or a healthy reference sample (pooled BG-SA data for healthy participants in previous studies). Decision trees evaluated how accurately BG-SA performance classified SR-mTBI recovery trajectories. RESULTS: BG-SA TOJ, TOJc, and DUR poorly discriminated between cases belonging to the SR-mTBI sample or a healthy reference sample (0.54–0.70 AUC, 47.46–64.71 PPV, 48.48–61.11 NPV). The BG-SA evaluated did not accurately classify SR-mTBI recovery trajectories (> 14-day resolution 48%, ≤14–day resolution 54%, lost to referral/follow-up 45%). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed differences in BG-SA TOJc performance between SR-mTBI participants and the healthy reference sample at initial clinical assessment and at clinical recovery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BG-SA TOJ, TOJc, and DUR appear to have limited clinical utility to assist clinicians with diagnosing SR-mTBI or predicting recovery trajectories under ecologically valid conditions. Neurophysiological abnormalities persisted beyond clinical recovery given abnormal BG-SA TOJc performance observed when SR-mTBI patients achieved clinical recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83530352021-08-25 Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI McGeown, Joshua P. Hume, Patria A. Kara, Stephen King, Doug Theadom, Alice Sports Med Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical utility of tactile somatosensory assessments to assist clinicians in diagnosing sport-related mild traumatic brain injury (SR-mTBI), classifying recovery trajectory based on performance at initial clinical assessment, and determining if neurophysiological recovery coincided with clinical recovery. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with normative controls. METHODS: At admission (n = 79) and discharge (n = 45/79), SR-mTBI patients completed the SCAT-5 symptom scale, along with the following three components from the Cortical Metrics Brain Gauge somatosensory assessment (BG-SA): temporal order judgement (TOJ), TOJ with confounding condition (TOJc), and duration discrimination (DUR). To assist SR-mTBI diagnosis on admission, BG-SA performance was used in logistic regression to discriminate cases belonging to the SR-mTBI sample or a healthy reference sample (pooled BG-SA data for healthy participants in previous studies). Decision trees evaluated how accurately BG-SA performance classified SR-mTBI recovery trajectories. RESULTS: BG-SA TOJ, TOJc, and DUR poorly discriminated between cases belonging to the SR-mTBI sample or a healthy reference sample (0.54–0.70 AUC, 47.46–64.71 PPV, 48.48–61.11 NPV). The BG-SA evaluated did not accurately classify SR-mTBI recovery trajectories (> 14-day resolution 48%, ≤14–day resolution 54%, lost to referral/follow-up 45%). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed differences in BG-SA TOJc performance between SR-mTBI participants and the healthy reference sample at initial clinical assessment and at clinical recovery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BG-SA TOJ, TOJc, and DUR appear to have limited clinical utility to assist clinicians with diagnosing SR-mTBI or predicting recovery trajectories under ecologically valid conditions. Neurophysiological abnormalities persisted beyond clinical recovery given abnormal BG-SA TOJc performance observed when SR-mTBI patients achieved clinical recovery. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8353035/ /pubmed/34370132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00340-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
McGeown, Joshua P.
Hume, Patria A.
Kara, Stephen
King, Doug
Theadom, Alice
Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI
title Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI
title_full Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI
title_fullStr Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI
title_short Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI
title_sort preliminary evidence for the clinical utility of tactile somatosensory assessments of sport-related mtbi
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00340-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgeownjoshuap preliminaryevidencefortheclinicalutilityoftactilesomatosensoryassessmentsofsportrelatedmtbi
AT humepatriaa preliminaryevidencefortheclinicalutilityoftactilesomatosensoryassessmentsofsportrelatedmtbi
AT karastephen preliminaryevidencefortheclinicalutilityoftactilesomatosensoryassessmentsofsportrelatedmtbi
AT kingdoug preliminaryevidencefortheclinicalutilityoftactilesomatosensoryassessmentsofsportrelatedmtbi
AT theadomalice preliminaryevidencefortheclinicalutilityoftactilesomatosensoryassessmentsofsportrelatedmtbi