Cargando…

Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide

In the past nearly 20 years, organ-sparing when no apparent viable tumour is present after neoadjuvant therapy has taken an increasingly relevant role in the therapeutic management of locally-advanced rectal cancer patients. The decision to include a patient or not in a “Watch-and-Wait” program reli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santiago, Inês, Rodrigues, Bernardete, Barata, Maria, Figueiredo, Nuno, Fernandez, Laura, Galzerano, Antonio, Parés, Oriol, Matos, Celso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01055-w
_version_ 1783736316400238592
author Santiago, Inês
Rodrigues, Bernardete
Barata, Maria
Figueiredo, Nuno
Fernandez, Laura
Galzerano, Antonio
Parés, Oriol
Matos, Celso
author_facet Santiago, Inês
Rodrigues, Bernardete
Barata, Maria
Figueiredo, Nuno
Fernandez, Laura
Galzerano, Antonio
Parés, Oriol
Matos, Celso
author_sort Santiago, Inês
collection PubMed
description In the past nearly 20 years, organ-sparing when no apparent viable tumour is present after neoadjuvant therapy has taken an increasingly relevant role in the therapeutic management of locally-advanced rectal cancer patients. The decision to include a patient or not in a “Watch-and-Wait” program relies mainly on endoscopic assessment by skilled surgeons, and MR imaging by experienced radiologists. Strict surveillance using the same modalities is required, given the chance of a local regrowth is of approximately 25–30%, almost always surgically salvageable if caught early. Local regrowths occur at the endoluminal aspect of the primary tumour bed in almost 90% of patients, but the rest are deep within it or outside the rectal wall, in which case detection relies solely on MR Imaging. In this educational review, we provide a practical guide for radiologists who are, or intend to be, involved in the re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients in institutions with an established “Watch-and-Wait” program. First, we discuss patient preparation and MR imaging acquisition technique. Second, we focus on the re-staging MR imaging examination and review the imaging findings that allow us to assess response. Third, we focus on follow-up assessments of patients who defer surgery and confer about the early signs that may indicate a sustained/non-sustained complete response, a rectal/extra-rectal regrowth, and the particular prognosis of the “near-complete” responders. Finally, we discuss our proposed report template.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83530372021-08-25 Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide Santiago, Inês Rodrigues, Bernardete Barata, Maria Figueiredo, Nuno Fernandez, Laura Galzerano, Antonio Parés, Oriol Matos, Celso Insights Imaging Educational Review In the past nearly 20 years, organ-sparing when no apparent viable tumour is present after neoadjuvant therapy has taken an increasingly relevant role in the therapeutic management of locally-advanced rectal cancer patients. The decision to include a patient or not in a “Watch-and-Wait” program relies mainly on endoscopic assessment by skilled surgeons, and MR imaging by experienced radiologists. Strict surveillance using the same modalities is required, given the chance of a local regrowth is of approximately 25–30%, almost always surgically salvageable if caught early. Local regrowths occur at the endoluminal aspect of the primary tumour bed in almost 90% of patients, but the rest are deep within it or outside the rectal wall, in which case detection relies solely on MR Imaging. In this educational review, we provide a practical guide for radiologists who are, or intend to be, involved in the re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients in institutions with an established “Watch-and-Wait” program. First, we discuss patient preparation and MR imaging acquisition technique. Second, we focus on the re-staging MR imaging examination and review the imaging findings that allow us to assess response. Third, we focus on follow-up assessments of patients who defer surgery and confer about the early signs that may indicate a sustained/non-sustained complete response, a rectal/extra-rectal regrowth, and the particular prognosis of the “near-complete” responders. Finally, we discuss our proposed report template. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8353037/ /pubmed/34373961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01055-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Educational Review
Santiago, Inês
Rodrigues, Bernardete
Barata, Maria
Figueiredo, Nuno
Fernandez, Laura
Galzerano, Antonio
Parés, Oriol
Matos, Celso
Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide
title Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide
title_full Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide
title_fullStr Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide
title_full_unstemmed Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide
title_short Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when “Watch-and-Wait” is an option: a practical guide
title_sort re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with mr imaging when “watch-and-wait” is an option: a practical guide
topic Educational Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01055-w
work_keys_str_mv AT santiagoines restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide
AT rodriguesbernardete restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide
AT baratamaria restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide
AT figueiredonuno restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide
AT fernandezlaura restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide
AT galzeranoantonio restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide
AT paresoriol restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide
AT matoscelso restagingandfollowupofrectalcancerpatientswithmrimagingwhenwatchandwaitisanoptionapracticalguide