Cargando…
Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review
PURPOSE: Trauma is a global public health challenge. Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes can help better understand and reduce the consequences of trauma. METHODS: We performed a scoping review to map the existing research on post-discharge outcomes for trauma patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00346-6 |
_version_ | 1783736317392191488 |
---|---|
author | David, Siddarth Daniels Roy, Nobhojit Solomon, Harris Lundborg, Cecilia Stålsby Wärnberg, Martin Gerdin |
author_facet | David, Siddarth Daniels Roy, Nobhojit Solomon, Harris Lundborg, Cecilia Stålsby Wärnberg, Martin Gerdin |
author_sort | David, Siddarth Daniels |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Trauma is a global public health challenge. Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes can help better understand and reduce the consequences of trauma. METHODS: We performed a scoping review to map the existing research on post-discharge outcomes for trauma patients, irrespective of the country or setting in which the study was performed. The scoping review was conducted by searching six databases – MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus, BASE, and Web of Science – to identify all articles that report post-discharge socioeconomic or quality of life outcomes in trauma patients from 2009 to 2018. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-eight articles were included in this study, extracting 958 outcomes. Most studies (82%) were from high-income countries (HICs). More studies from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were cross-sectional (71%) compared with HIC settings (46%). There was a wide variety of different definitions, interpretations, and measurements used by various articles for similar outcomes. Quality of life, return to work, social support, cost, and participation were the main outcomes studied in post-discharge trauma patients. CONCLUSIONS: The wide range of outcomes and outcome measures reported across different types of injuries and settings. This variability can be a barrier when comparing across different types of injuries and settings. Post-discharge trauma studies should move towards building evidence based on standardized measurement of outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00346-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8353045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83530452021-08-25 Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review David, Siddarth Daniels Roy, Nobhojit Solomon, Harris Lundborg, Cecilia Stålsby Wärnberg, Martin Gerdin J Patient Rep Outcomes Review PURPOSE: Trauma is a global public health challenge. Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes can help better understand and reduce the consequences of trauma. METHODS: We performed a scoping review to map the existing research on post-discharge outcomes for trauma patients, irrespective of the country or setting in which the study was performed. The scoping review was conducted by searching six databases – MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus, BASE, and Web of Science – to identify all articles that report post-discharge socioeconomic or quality of life outcomes in trauma patients from 2009 to 2018. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-eight articles were included in this study, extracting 958 outcomes. Most studies (82%) were from high-income countries (HICs). More studies from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were cross-sectional (71%) compared with HIC settings (46%). There was a wide variety of different definitions, interpretations, and measurements used by various articles for similar outcomes. Quality of life, return to work, social support, cost, and participation were the main outcomes studied in post-discharge trauma patients. CONCLUSIONS: The wide range of outcomes and outcome measures reported across different types of injuries and settings. This variability can be a barrier when comparing across different types of injuries and settings. Post-discharge trauma studies should move towards building evidence based on standardized measurement of outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00346-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8353045/ /pubmed/34370128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00346-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review David, Siddarth Daniels Roy, Nobhojit Solomon, Harris Lundborg, Cecilia Stålsby Wärnberg, Martin Gerdin Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review |
title | Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review |
title_full | Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review |
title_short | Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review |
title_sort | measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00346-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidsiddarthdaniels measuringpostdischargesocioeconomicandqualityoflifeoutcomesintraumapatientsascopingreview AT roynobhojit measuringpostdischargesocioeconomicandqualityoflifeoutcomesintraumapatientsascopingreview AT solomonharris measuringpostdischargesocioeconomicandqualityoflifeoutcomesintraumapatientsascopingreview AT lundborgceciliastalsby measuringpostdischargesocioeconomicandqualityoflifeoutcomesintraumapatientsascopingreview AT warnbergmartingerdin measuringpostdischargesocioeconomicandqualityoflifeoutcomesintraumapatientsascopingreview |