Cargando…

Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models

Risk measure forecast and model have been developed in order to not only provide better forecast but also preserve its (empirical) property especially coherent property. Whilst the widely used risk measure of Value-at-Risk (VaR) has shown its performance and benefit in many applications, it is in fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Josaphat, Bony Parulian, Syuhada, Khreshna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34401553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07492
_version_ 1783736371308920832
author Josaphat, Bony Parulian
Syuhada, Khreshna
author_facet Josaphat, Bony Parulian
Syuhada, Khreshna
author_sort Josaphat, Bony Parulian
collection PubMed
description Risk measure forecast and model have been developed in order to not only provide better forecast but also preserve its (empirical) property especially coherent property. Whilst the widely used risk measure of Value-at-Risk (VaR) has shown its performance and benefit in many applications, it is in fact not a coherent risk measure. Conditional VaR (CoVaR), defined as mean of losses beyond VaR, is one of alternative risk measures that satisfies coherent property. There have been several extensions of CoVaR such as Modified CoVaR (MCoVaR) and Copula CoVaR (CCoVaR). In this paper, we propose another risk measure, called Dependent CoVaR (DCoVaR), for a target loss that depends on another random loss, including model parameter treated as random loss. It is found that our DCoVaR provides better forecast than both MCoVaR and CCoVaR. Numerical simulation is carried out to illustrate the proposed DCoVaR. In addition, we do an empirical study of financial returns data to compute the DCoVaR forecast for heteroscedastic process of GARCH(1,1). The empirical results show that the Gumbel Copula describes the dependence structure of the returns quite nicely and the forecast of DCoVaR using Gumbel Copula is more accurate than that of using Clayton Copula. The DCoVaR is superior than MCoVaR, CCoVaR and CoVaR to comprehend the connection between bivariate losses and to help us exceedingly about how optimum to position our investments and elevate our financial risk protection. In other words, putting on the suggested risk measure will enable us to avoid non-essential extra capital allocation while not neglecting other risks associated with the target risk. Moreover, in actuarial context, DCoVaR can be applied to determine insurance premiums while reducing the risk of insurance company.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83532952021-08-15 Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models Josaphat, Bony Parulian Syuhada, Khreshna Heliyon Research Article Risk measure forecast and model have been developed in order to not only provide better forecast but also preserve its (empirical) property especially coherent property. Whilst the widely used risk measure of Value-at-Risk (VaR) has shown its performance and benefit in many applications, it is in fact not a coherent risk measure. Conditional VaR (CoVaR), defined as mean of losses beyond VaR, is one of alternative risk measures that satisfies coherent property. There have been several extensions of CoVaR such as Modified CoVaR (MCoVaR) and Copula CoVaR (CCoVaR). In this paper, we propose another risk measure, called Dependent CoVaR (DCoVaR), for a target loss that depends on another random loss, including model parameter treated as random loss. It is found that our DCoVaR provides better forecast than both MCoVaR and CCoVaR. Numerical simulation is carried out to illustrate the proposed DCoVaR. In addition, we do an empirical study of financial returns data to compute the DCoVaR forecast for heteroscedastic process of GARCH(1,1). The empirical results show that the Gumbel Copula describes the dependence structure of the returns quite nicely and the forecast of DCoVaR using Gumbel Copula is more accurate than that of using Clayton Copula. The DCoVaR is superior than MCoVaR, CCoVaR and CoVaR to comprehend the connection between bivariate losses and to help us exceedingly about how optimum to position our investments and elevate our financial risk protection. In other words, putting on the suggested risk measure will enable us to avoid non-essential extra capital allocation while not neglecting other risks associated with the target risk. Moreover, in actuarial context, DCoVaR can be applied to determine insurance premiums while reducing the risk of insurance company. Elsevier 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8353295/ /pubmed/34401553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07492 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Josaphat, Bony Parulian
Syuhada, Khreshna
Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models
title Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models
title_full Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models
title_fullStr Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models
title_full_unstemmed Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models
title_short Dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models
title_sort dependent conditional value-at-risk for aggregate risk models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34401553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07492
work_keys_str_mv AT josaphatbonyparulian dependentconditionalvalueatriskforaggregateriskmodels
AT syuhadakhreshna dependentconditionalvalueatriskforaggregateriskmodels