Cargando…

Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment

INTRODUCTION: The process of treatment delivery involves a series of steps from patient evaluation, therapeutic simulation (simulation), followed by dosimetric treatment planning, pre-treatment quality assurance and plan verification, and ultimately treatment delivery. Each step has a strict precede...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chowdhry, Varun Kumar, Daniel, Zachary, Hackett, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34401539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.003
_version_ 1783736420875108352
author Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
Daniel, Zachary
Hackett, Rachel
author_facet Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
Daniel, Zachary
Hackett, Rachel
author_sort Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The process of treatment delivery involves a series of steps from patient evaluation, therapeutic simulation (simulation), followed by dosimetric treatment planning, pre-treatment quality assurance and plan verification, and ultimately treatment delivery. Each step has a strict precedence relationship, requiring the preceding task to be completed prior to the initiation of the next task. The minimum time for a patient to undergo treatment is based on the summation of times of the individual tasks. Nevertheless, patients are often scheduled based on factors that do not directly consider the overall time required to complete these steps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To better help in scheduling patients and to ensure quality and safety of treatment planning and delivery, we undertook a quality initiative based on team members tabulating time required to complete tasks required for treatment delivery. We established “fastest possible” turnaround times based how quickly a task could be accomplished if there were minimal or no competing obligations, as well as processing times under routine operating conditions. RESULTS: For urgent situations, we found that our center can accommodate treatment within 24 h. For routine plans using 3D conformal radiation, an approximately 1-week turnaround time is needed. For patients being treated with IMRT/VMAT an approximately 2-week turnaround time is needed. CONCLUSIONS: The growing complexity of radiotherapy delivery also requires additional steps which has increased turnaround times from simulation to treatment compared to historical standards. We report our estimates for turnaround time based on plan type and acuity level. While our turnaround times may not be applicable to all centers, we believe that this exercise was helpful to facilitate inter- and intra- departmental communication regarding reasonable start times for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83535002021-08-15 Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment Chowdhry, Varun Kumar Daniel, Zachary Hackett, Rachel Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Short Communications and Technical Notes INTRODUCTION: The process of treatment delivery involves a series of steps from patient evaluation, therapeutic simulation (simulation), followed by dosimetric treatment planning, pre-treatment quality assurance and plan verification, and ultimately treatment delivery. Each step has a strict precedence relationship, requiring the preceding task to be completed prior to the initiation of the next task. The minimum time for a patient to undergo treatment is based on the summation of times of the individual tasks. Nevertheless, patients are often scheduled based on factors that do not directly consider the overall time required to complete these steps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To better help in scheduling patients and to ensure quality and safety of treatment planning and delivery, we undertook a quality initiative based on team members tabulating time required to complete tasks required for treatment delivery. We established “fastest possible” turnaround times based how quickly a task could be accomplished if there were minimal or no competing obligations, as well as processing times under routine operating conditions. RESULTS: For urgent situations, we found that our center can accommodate treatment within 24 h. For routine plans using 3D conformal radiation, an approximately 1-week turnaround time is needed. For patients being treated with IMRT/VMAT an approximately 2-week turnaround time is needed. CONCLUSIONS: The growing complexity of radiotherapy delivery also requires additional steps which has increased turnaround times from simulation to treatment compared to historical standards. We report our estimates for turnaround time based on plan type and acuity level. While our turnaround times may not be applicable to all centers, we believe that this exercise was helpful to facilitate inter- and intra- departmental communication regarding reasonable start times for patients. Elsevier 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8353500/ /pubmed/34401539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communications and Technical Notes
Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
Daniel, Zachary
Hackett, Rachel
Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment
title Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment
title_full Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment
title_fullStr Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment
title_full_unstemmed Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment
title_short Departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment
title_sort departmental quality initiative to establish turnaround times from simulation to treatment
topic Short Communications and Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34401539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT chowdhryvarunkumar departmentalqualityinitiativetoestablishturnaroundtimesfromsimulationtotreatment
AT danielzachary departmentalqualityinitiativetoestablishturnaroundtimesfromsimulationtotreatment
AT hackettrachel departmentalqualityinitiativetoestablishturnaroundtimesfromsimulationtotreatment