Cargando…

Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportions of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who despite achieving the no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) status in the first 2 treatment years experienced relapse-associated worsening (RAW) or progression independent from rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prosperini, Luca, Ruggieri, Serena, Haggiag, Shalom, Tortorella, Carla, Pozzilli, Carlo, Gasperini, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001059
_version_ 1783736448561709056
author Prosperini, Luca
Ruggieri, Serena
Haggiag, Shalom
Tortorella, Carla
Pozzilli, Carlo
Gasperini, Claudio
author_facet Prosperini, Luca
Ruggieri, Serena
Haggiag, Shalom
Tortorella, Carla
Pozzilli, Carlo
Gasperini, Claudio
author_sort Prosperini, Luca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportions of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who despite achieving the no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) status in the first 2 treatment years experienced relapse-associated worsening (RAW) or progression independent from relapse activity (PIRA) in the following years. METHODS: We selected patients with NEDA-3—defined as no relapse, no disability worsening, and no MRI activity—in the first 2 years of either glatiramer acetate or interferon beta as initial treatment. We estimated the long-term probability of subsequent RAW and PIRA (considered as 2 contrasting outcomes) by cumulative incidence functions. Competing risk regressions were used to identify the baseline (i.e., at treatment start) predictors of RAW and PIRA. RESULTS: Of 687 patients, 224 (32.6%) had NEDA-3 in the first 2 treatment years. After a median follow-up time of 12 years from treatment start, 58 patients (26%) experienced disability accrual: 31 (14%) had RAW and 27 (12%) had PIRA. RAW was predicted by the presence of >9 T2 lesions (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 3.92, p = 0.012) and contrast-enhancing lesions (SHR = 2.38, p = 0.047) on baseline MRI scan and either temporary or permanent discontinuation of the initial treatment (SHR = 1.11, p = 0.015). PIRA was predicted by advancing age (SHR = 1.05, p = 0.036 for each year increase) and presence of ≥1 spinal cord lesion on baseline MRI scan (SHR = 4.08, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION: The adoption of NEDA-3 criteria led to prognostic misclassification in 1 of 4 patients. Different risk factors were associated with RAW and PIRA, suggesting alternative mechanisms for disability accrual. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with RRMS who attained NEDA-3 status, subsequent RAW was associated with baseline MRI activity and discontinuation of treatment and PIRA was associated with age and the presence of baseline spinal cord lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83536672021-08-10 Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis Prosperini, Luca Ruggieri, Serena Haggiag, Shalom Tortorella, Carla Pozzilli, Carlo Gasperini, Claudio Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportions of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who despite achieving the no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) status in the first 2 treatment years experienced relapse-associated worsening (RAW) or progression independent from relapse activity (PIRA) in the following years. METHODS: We selected patients with NEDA-3—defined as no relapse, no disability worsening, and no MRI activity—in the first 2 years of either glatiramer acetate or interferon beta as initial treatment. We estimated the long-term probability of subsequent RAW and PIRA (considered as 2 contrasting outcomes) by cumulative incidence functions. Competing risk regressions were used to identify the baseline (i.e., at treatment start) predictors of RAW and PIRA. RESULTS: Of 687 patients, 224 (32.6%) had NEDA-3 in the first 2 treatment years. After a median follow-up time of 12 years from treatment start, 58 patients (26%) experienced disability accrual: 31 (14%) had RAW and 27 (12%) had PIRA. RAW was predicted by the presence of >9 T2 lesions (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 3.92, p = 0.012) and contrast-enhancing lesions (SHR = 2.38, p = 0.047) on baseline MRI scan and either temporary or permanent discontinuation of the initial treatment (SHR = 1.11, p = 0.015). PIRA was predicted by advancing age (SHR = 1.05, p = 0.036 for each year increase) and presence of ≥1 spinal cord lesion on baseline MRI scan (SHR = 4.08, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION: The adoption of NEDA-3 criteria led to prognostic misclassification in 1 of 4 patients. Different risk factors were associated with RAW and PIRA, suggesting alternative mechanisms for disability accrual. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with RRMS who attained NEDA-3 status, subsequent RAW was associated with baseline MRI activity and discontinuation of treatment and PIRA was associated with age and the presence of baseline spinal cord lesions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8353667/ /pubmed/34373345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001059 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Prosperini, Luca
Ruggieri, Serena
Haggiag, Shalom
Tortorella, Carla
Pozzilli, Carlo
Gasperini, Claudio
Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis
title Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis
title_full Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis
title_short Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort prognostic accuracy of neda-3 in long-term outcomes of multiple sclerosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001059
work_keys_str_mv AT prosperiniluca prognosticaccuracyofneda3inlongtermoutcomesofmultiplesclerosis
AT ruggieriserena prognosticaccuracyofneda3inlongtermoutcomesofmultiplesclerosis
AT haggiagshalom prognosticaccuracyofneda3inlongtermoutcomesofmultiplesclerosis
AT tortorellacarla prognosticaccuracyofneda3inlongtermoutcomesofmultiplesclerosis
AT pozzillicarlo prognosticaccuracyofneda3inlongtermoutcomesofmultiplesclerosis
AT gasperiniclaudio prognosticaccuracyofneda3inlongtermoutcomesofmultiplesclerosis