Cargando…
Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
BACKGROUND: To compare the value of interim (18)F-FLT-PET and (18)F-FDG-PET for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer after salvage therapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received PET/CT using (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG at baseline, after the 1st and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08649-z |
_version_ | 1783736487607533568 |
---|---|
author | Su, Tzu-Pei Huang, Jen-Seng Chang, Pei-Hung Lui, Kar-Wai Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun Ng, Shu-Hang Chan, Sheng-Chieh |
author_facet | Su, Tzu-Pei Huang, Jen-Seng Chang, Pei-Hung Lui, Kar-Wai Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun Ng, Shu-Hang Chan, Sheng-Chieh |
author_sort | Su, Tzu-Pei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the value of interim (18)F-FLT-PET and (18)F-FDG-PET for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer after salvage therapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received PET/CT using (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG at baseline, after the 1st and 2nd cycle of systemic chemotherapy. The clinical response was classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 based on contrast-enhanced CT after 3 months of systemic chemotherapy. The metabolic response on PET was assessed according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria or PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and was correlated to the clinical response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients entered final analysis. On (18)F-FDG-PET, clinical responders after 2 chemotherapy cycles (post-2c) had a significantly greater reduction of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) and the peak SUV corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) of the tumor than non-responders (P = 0.030 and 0.003). Metabolic response determined by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET showed a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.801 in predicting clinical response (P = 0.011). Patients who were metabolic responders by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET had a significantly longer PFS (53.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.014) and OS (100% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.046) than non-responders. Survival differences between responders and non-responders in the interim (18)F-FLT-PET were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FLT-PET failed to show an advantage over (18)F-FDG-PET in predicting the treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Assessment of treatment outcome by interim (18)F-FDG-PET may aid treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on 02/06/2020 on Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT04411966). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8353848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83538482021-08-11 Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer Su, Tzu-Pei Huang, Jen-Seng Chang, Pei-Hung Lui, Kar-Wai Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun Ng, Shu-Hang Chan, Sheng-Chieh BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: To compare the value of interim (18)F-FLT-PET and (18)F-FDG-PET for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer after salvage therapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received PET/CT using (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG at baseline, after the 1st and 2nd cycle of systemic chemotherapy. The clinical response was classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 based on contrast-enhanced CT after 3 months of systemic chemotherapy. The metabolic response on PET was assessed according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria or PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and was correlated to the clinical response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients entered final analysis. On (18)F-FDG-PET, clinical responders after 2 chemotherapy cycles (post-2c) had a significantly greater reduction of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) and the peak SUV corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) of the tumor than non-responders (P = 0.030 and 0.003). Metabolic response determined by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET showed a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.801 in predicting clinical response (P = 0.011). Patients who were metabolic responders by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET had a significantly longer PFS (53.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.014) and OS (100% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.046) than non-responders. Survival differences between responders and non-responders in the interim (18)F-FLT-PET were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FLT-PET failed to show an advantage over (18)F-FDG-PET in predicting the treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Assessment of treatment outcome by interim (18)F-FDG-PET may aid treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on 02/06/2020 on Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT04411966). BioMed Central 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8353848/ /pubmed/34376155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08649-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Su, Tzu-Pei Huang, Jen-Seng Chang, Pei-Hung Lui, Kar-Wai Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun Ng, Shu-Hang Chan, Sheng-Chieh Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer |
title | Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer |
title_full | Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer |
title_short | Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer |
title_sort | prospective comparison of early interim (18)f-fdg-pet with (18)f-flt-pet for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08649-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sutzupei prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer AT huangjenseng prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer AT changpeihung prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer AT luikarwai prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer AT hsiehjasonchiahsun prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer AT ngshuhang prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer AT chanshengchieh prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer |