Cargando…

Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: To compare the value of interim (18)F-FLT-PET and (18)F-FDG-PET for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer after salvage therapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received PET/CT using (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG at baseline, after the 1st and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Tzu-Pei, Huang, Jen-Seng, Chang, Pei-Hung, Lui, Kar-Wai, Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun, Ng, Shu-Hang, Chan, Sheng-Chieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08649-z
_version_ 1783736487607533568
author Su, Tzu-Pei
Huang, Jen-Seng
Chang, Pei-Hung
Lui, Kar-Wai
Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun
Ng, Shu-Hang
Chan, Sheng-Chieh
author_facet Su, Tzu-Pei
Huang, Jen-Seng
Chang, Pei-Hung
Lui, Kar-Wai
Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun
Ng, Shu-Hang
Chan, Sheng-Chieh
author_sort Su, Tzu-Pei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the value of interim (18)F-FLT-PET and (18)F-FDG-PET for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer after salvage therapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received PET/CT using (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG at baseline, after the 1st and 2nd cycle of systemic chemotherapy. The clinical response was classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 based on contrast-enhanced CT after 3 months of systemic chemotherapy. The metabolic response on PET was assessed according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria or PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and was correlated to the clinical response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients entered final analysis. On (18)F-FDG-PET, clinical responders after 2 chemotherapy cycles (post-2c) had a significantly greater reduction of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) and the peak SUV corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) of the tumor than non-responders (P = 0.030 and 0.003). Metabolic response determined by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET showed a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.801 in predicting clinical response (P = 0.011). Patients who were metabolic responders by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET had a significantly longer PFS (53.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.014) and OS (100% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.046) than non-responders. Survival differences between responders and non-responders in the interim (18)F-FLT-PET were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FLT-PET failed to show an advantage over (18)F-FDG-PET in predicting the treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Assessment of treatment outcome by interim (18)F-FDG-PET may aid treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on 02/06/2020 on Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT04411966).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83538482021-08-11 Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer Su, Tzu-Pei Huang, Jen-Seng Chang, Pei-Hung Lui, Kar-Wai Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun Ng, Shu-Hang Chan, Sheng-Chieh BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: To compare the value of interim (18)F-FLT-PET and (18)F-FDG-PET for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer after salvage therapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received PET/CT using (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG at baseline, after the 1st and 2nd cycle of systemic chemotherapy. The clinical response was classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 based on contrast-enhanced CT after 3 months of systemic chemotherapy. The metabolic response on PET was assessed according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria or PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and was correlated to the clinical response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients entered final analysis. On (18)F-FDG-PET, clinical responders after 2 chemotherapy cycles (post-2c) had a significantly greater reduction of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) and the peak SUV corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) of the tumor than non-responders (P = 0.030 and 0.003). Metabolic response determined by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET showed a high area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.801 in predicting clinical response (P = 0.011). Patients who were metabolic responders by PERCIST on post-2c (18)F-FDG-PET had a significantly longer PFS (53.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.014) and OS (100% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.046) than non-responders. Survival differences between responders and non-responders in the interim (18)F-FLT-PET were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FLT-PET failed to show an advantage over (18)F-FDG-PET in predicting the treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Assessment of treatment outcome by interim (18)F-FDG-PET may aid treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on 02/06/2020 on Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT04411966). BioMed Central 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8353848/ /pubmed/34376155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08649-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Su, Tzu-Pei
Huang, Jen-Seng
Chang, Pei-Hung
Lui, Kar-Wai
Hsieh, Jason Chia-Hsun
Ng, Shu-Hang
Chan, Sheng-Chieh
Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
title Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
title_full Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
title_short Prospective comparison of early interim (18)F-FDG-PET with (18)F-FLT-PET for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
title_sort prospective comparison of early interim (18)f-fdg-pet with (18)f-flt-pet for predicting treatment response and survival in metastatic breast cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08649-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sutzupei prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT huangjenseng prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT changpeihung prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT luikarwai prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT hsiehjasonchiahsun prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT ngshuhang prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT chanshengchieh prospectivecomparisonofearlyinterim18ffdgpetwith18ffltpetforpredictingtreatmentresponseandsurvivalinmetastaticbreastcancer