Cargando…

Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP)

BACKGROUND: Blunt chest wall injuries can lead to complications, especially without early intervention. A blunt Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP) was developed to help improve the consistency of evidence-based care following admission to the emergency department. Implementation strategy fidelity is the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kourouche, Sarah, Curtis, Kate, Munroe, Belinda, Watts, Michael, Balzer, Sharyn, Buckley, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00189-8
_version_ 1783736491672862720
author Kourouche, Sarah
Curtis, Kate
Munroe, Belinda
Watts, Michael
Balzer, Sharyn
Buckley, Thomas
author_facet Kourouche, Sarah
Curtis, Kate
Munroe, Belinda
Watts, Michael
Balzer, Sharyn
Buckley, Thomas
author_sort Kourouche, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blunt chest wall injuries can lead to complications, especially without early intervention. A blunt Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP) was developed to help improve the consistency of evidence-based care following admission to the emergency department. Implementation strategy fidelity is the extent to which the strategies of implementation are delivered in line with the intended plan. The aim of this study was to assess fidelity to the strategies of the implementation plan developed for ChIP. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of strategies used for implementation was performed, specifically the behaviour change techniques (BCTs). BCTs were used as part of an implementation plan derived based on the Behaviour Change Wheel from results from a staff survey at two hospitals. Levels of implementation or adaptation for BCTs were scored by implementers as follows: ‘Were the behaviour change interventions implemented?’ (0 = ‘not implemented’, 1 = partially implemented, and 2 = fully implemented); ‘Were adaptations made to the implementation plan?’, scored 1 (many changes from plan) to 4 (just as planned). Free text explanation to their responses was also collected with supporting evidence and documentation (such as emails, implementation checklists, audit reports, and incident reports). RESULTS: There was high overall fidelity of 97.6% for BCTs partially or fully implemented. More than three quarters (32/42, 76.2%) of the BCTs were fully implemented with an additional 9/42 (21.4%) partially implemented. BCTs that were not fully implemented were social support, feedback on behaviour, feedback on outcomes of behaviour, adding objects to the environment, and restructuring the environment. The modes of delivery with poorer implementation or increased adaptations were clinical champions and audit/feedback. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the evaluation of implementation strategy fidelity in the acute care context. The systematic use and application of the behaviour change wheel was used to develop an implementation plan and was associated with high implementation strategy fidelity. A fidelity checklist developed during the implementation process may help implementers assess fidelity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on ANZCTR. Registration number ACTRN12618001548224, date approved 17/09/2018 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00189-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8353870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83538702021-08-11 Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP) Kourouche, Sarah Curtis, Kate Munroe, Belinda Watts, Michael Balzer, Sharyn Buckley, Thomas Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: Blunt chest wall injuries can lead to complications, especially without early intervention. A blunt Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP) was developed to help improve the consistency of evidence-based care following admission to the emergency department. Implementation strategy fidelity is the extent to which the strategies of implementation are delivered in line with the intended plan. The aim of this study was to assess fidelity to the strategies of the implementation plan developed for ChIP. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of strategies used for implementation was performed, specifically the behaviour change techniques (BCTs). BCTs were used as part of an implementation plan derived based on the Behaviour Change Wheel from results from a staff survey at two hospitals. Levels of implementation or adaptation for BCTs were scored by implementers as follows: ‘Were the behaviour change interventions implemented?’ (0 = ‘not implemented’, 1 = partially implemented, and 2 = fully implemented); ‘Were adaptations made to the implementation plan?’, scored 1 (many changes from plan) to 4 (just as planned). Free text explanation to their responses was also collected with supporting evidence and documentation (such as emails, implementation checklists, audit reports, and incident reports). RESULTS: There was high overall fidelity of 97.6% for BCTs partially or fully implemented. More than three quarters (32/42, 76.2%) of the BCTs were fully implemented with an additional 9/42 (21.4%) partially implemented. BCTs that were not fully implemented were social support, feedback on behaviour, feedback on outcomes of behaviour, adding objects to the environment, and restructuring the environment. The modes of delivery with poorer implementation or increased adaptations were clinical champions and audit/feedback. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the evaluation of implementation strategy fidelity in the acute care context. The systematic use and application of the behaviour change wheel was used to develop an implementation plan and was associated with high implementation strategy fidelity. A fidelity checklist developed during the implementation process may help implementers assess fidelity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on ANZCTR. Registration number ACTRN12618001548224, date approved 17/09/2018 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00189-8. BioMed Central 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8353870/ /pubmed/34376254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00189-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kourouche, Sarah
Curtis, Kate
Munroe, Belinda
Watts, Michael
Balzer, Sharyn
Buckley, Thomas
Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP)
title Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP)
title_full Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP)
title_fullStr Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP)
title_full_unstemmed Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP)
title_short Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP)
title_sort implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary chest injury protocol (chip)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00189-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kourouchesarah implementationstrategyfidelityevaluationforamultidisciplinarychestinjuryprotocolchip
AT curtiskate implementationstrategyfidelityevaluationforamultidisciplinarychestinjuryprotocolchip
AT munroebelinda implementationstrategyfidelityevaluationforamultidisciplinarychestinjuryprotocolchip
AT wattsmichael implementationstrategyfidelityevaluationforamultidisciplinarychestinjuryprotocolchip
AT balzersharyn implementationstrategyfidelityevaluationforamultidisciplinarychestinjuryprotocolchip
AT buckleythomas implementationstrategyfidelityevaluationforamultidisciplinarychestinjuryprotocolchip