Cargando…

Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION: Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are highly predisposed to low bone mineral density (BMD). This study aims to assess the value of quantitative ultrasound (QUS), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and their combination in detecting high-risk patients for low BMD in MHD. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiang, Ting, Zhou, Li, Fu, Ping, Yan, Xue-Ping, Zeng, Xiao-Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34369272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2021.1959347
_version_ 1783736545487880192
author Xiang, Ting
Zhou, Li
Fu, Ping
Yan, Xue-Ping
Zeng, Xiao-Qing
author_facet Xiang, Ting
Zhou, Li
Fu, Ping
Yan, Xue-Ping
Zeng, Xiao-Qing
author_sort Xiang, Ting
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are highly predisposed to low bone mineral density (BMD). This study aims to assess the value of quantitative ultrasound (QUS), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and their combination in detecting high-risk patients for low BMD in MHD. METHODS: Patients’ BMD of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone mineral content (BMC) was assessed using BIA. Calcaneal BMD was measured using QUS. Patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 were recorded as ‘low BMD.’ RESULTS: Overall, 93 subjects (62.37% female; mean age, 60.8 ± 16.2 years) were included in this cross-sectional study; approximately 36.56% met the ‘low BMD’ criteria. QUS-T score predicted low BMD with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.738, sensitivity of 70.59%, and specificity of 76.27%. The AUC for low BMD diagnosis using the BMC index (BMCI) measured through BIA was 0.679 (sensitivity, 91.18%; specificity, 38.98%). On the other hand, the combination of QUS-T score and BMCI yielded a higher AUC value of 0.762 with an improved specificity of 88.14%. Compared with the QUS and BIA alone, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) of the combination model increased by 47.16% (p = 0.022) and 78.36% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) increased by 5.25% (p = 0.043) and 9.99% (p = 0.003), respectively. QUS-T score and BMCI were related to BMD independently assessed by DXA. CONCLUSION: The combination of QUS and BIA is effective in screening for low BMD among MHD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8354166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83541662021-08-13 Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis Xiang, Ting Zhou, Li Fu, Ping Yan, Xue-Ping Zeng, Xiao-Qing Ren Fail Clinical Study INTRODUCTION: Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are highly predisposed to low bone mineral density (BMD). This study aims to assess the value of quantitative ultrasound (QUS), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and their combination in detecting high-risk patients for low BMD in MHD. METHODS: Patients’ BMD of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone mineral content (BMC) was assessed using BIA. Calcaneal BMD was measured using QUS. Patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 were recorded as ‘low BMD.’ RESULTS: Overall, 93 subjects (62.37% female; mean age, 60.8 ± 16.2 years) were included in this cross-sectional study; approximately 36.56% met the ‘low BMD’ criteria. QUS-T score predicted low BMD with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.738, sensitivity of 70.59%, and specificity of 76.27%. The AUC for low BMD diagnosis using the BMC index (BMCI) measured through BIA was 0.679 (sensitivity, 91.18%; specificity, 38.98%). On the other hand, the combination of QUS-T score and BMCI yielded a higher AUC value of 0.762 with an improved specificity of 88.14%. Compared with the QUS and BIA alone, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) of the combination model increased by 47.16% (p = 0.022) and 78.36% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) increased by 5.25% (p = 0.043) and 9.99% (p = 0.003), respectively. QUS-T score and BMCI were related to BMD independently assessed by DXA. CONCLUSION: The combination of QUS and BIA is effective in screening for low BMD among MHD patients. Taylor & Francis 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8354166/ /pubmed/34369272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2021.1959347 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Xiang, Ting
Zhou, Li
Fu, Ping
Yan, Xue-Ping
Zeng, Xiao-Qing
Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis
title Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis
title_full Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis
title_fullStr Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis
title_full_unstemmed Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis
title_short Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis
title_sort value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34369272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2021.1959347
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangting valueofquantitativeultrasoundandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisindetectinglowbonemineraldensityinhemodialysis
AT zhouli valueofquantitativeultrasoundandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisindetectinglowbonemineraldensityinhemodialysis
AT fuping valueofquantitativeultrasoundandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisindetectinglowbonemineraldensityinhemodialysis
AT yanxueping valueofquantitativeultrasoundandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisindetectinglowbonemineraldensityinhemodialysis
AT zengxiaoqing valueofquantitativeultrasoundandbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisindetectinglowbonemineraldensityinhemodialysis