Cargando…
Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of oral progestins and injectable gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist medication in cancer fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 40 breast cancer patients submitted to cancer fertility preservation,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34431852 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO5859 |
_version_ | 1783736625725964288 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Renato Maya, Bárbara Gomes Nogueira, Mariana Bittencourt Silva Conceição, Gabriel Seixas Bianco, Bianca Barbosa, Caio Parente |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Renato Maya, Bárbara Gomes Nogueira, Mariana Bittencourt Silva Conceição, Gabriel Seixas Bianco, Bianca Barbosa, Caio Parente |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Renato |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of oral progestins and injectable gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist medication in cancer fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 40 breast cancer patients submitted to cancer fertility preservation, who were divided into two groups according to histochemical analysis of progesterone receptors to define luteinizing hormone block: if positive, use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, if negative, use of oral progestins. The mean age, medication days, antral follicle count, number of oocytes in metaphase II and the occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were compared. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients both in the group using gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, and in the group with oral progestins, respectively, had a mean age of 33.9 (32-35.8) and 33.8 (32-35.6) years; days of medications of 11 (9.7-12.3) and 12.8 (11.6-13.9), p=0.037; antral follicle count of 9 (7.11-12) and 8.5 (6-11.9), p=0.370; metaphase II oocyte number of 4 (2.1-9.8) and 7.5 (3.1-10), p=0.348; and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome of 2 (10%) and 5 (25%) cases, p=0.212. CONCLUSION: The use of oral progestins, in spite of requiring longer treatment time, is effective in relation to the protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, and offers greater comfort at a lower cost in breast cancer patients with negative progesterone receptors, submitted to cancer fertility preservation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8354590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83545902021-08-13 Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study de Oliveira, Renato Maya, Bárbara Gomes Nogueira, Mariana Bittencourt Silva Conceição, Gabriel Seixas Bianco, Bianca Barbosa, Caio Parente Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of oral progestins and injectable gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist medication in cancer fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 40 breast cancer patients submitted to cancer fertility preservation, who were divided into two groups according to histochemical analysis of progesterone receptors to define luteinizing hormone block: if positive, use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, if negative, use of oral progestins. The mean age, medication days, antral follicle count, number of oocytes in metaphase II and the occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were compared. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients both in the group using gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, and in the group with oral progestins, respectively, had a mean age of 33.9 (32-35.8) and 33.8 (32-35.6) years; days of medications of 11 (9.7-12.3) and 12.8 (11.6-13.9), p=0.037; antral follicle count of 9 (7.11-12) and 8.5 (6-11.9), p=0.370; metaphase II oocyte number of 4 (2.1-9.8) and 7.5 (3.1-10), p=0.348; and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome of 2 (10%) and 5 (25%) cases, p=0.212. CONCLUSION: The use of oral progestins, in spite of requiring longer treatment time, is effective in relation to the protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, and offers greater comfort at a lower cost in breast cancer patients with negative progesterone receptors, submitted to cancer fertility preservation. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8354590/ /pubmed/34431852 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO5859 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Oliveira, Renato Maya, Bárbara Gomes Nogueira, Mariana Bittencourt Silva Conceição, Gabriel Seixas Bianco, Bianca Barbosa, Caio Parente Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study |
title | Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study |
title_full | Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study |
title_short | Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study |
title_sort | fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34431852 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO5859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirarenato fertilitypreservationinbreastcancerwithoralprogestinisitanoptionapilotstudy AT mayabarbaragomes fertilitypreservationinbreastcancerwithoralprogestinisitanoptionapilotstudy AT nogueiramarianabittencourtsilva fertilitypreservationinbreastcancerwithoralprogestinisitanoptionapilotstudy AT conceicaogabrielseixas fertilitypreservationinbreastcancerwithoralprogestinisitanoptionapilotstudy AT biancobianca fertilitypreservationinbreastcancerwithoralprogestinisitanoptionapilotstudy AT barbosacaioparente fertilitypreservationinbreastcancerwithoralprogestinisitanoptionapilotstudy |