Cargando…

Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

BACKGROUND: Some patients with COVID-19 who have recovered from the acute infection after experiencing only mild symptoms continue to exhibit persistent exertional limitation that often is unexplained by conventional investigative studies. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the pathophysiologic mechanism of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Inderjit, Joseph, Phillip, Heerdt, Paul M., Cullinan, Marjorie, Lutchmansingh, Denyse D., Gulati, Mridu, Possick, Jennifer D., Systrom, David M., Waxman, Aaron B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.010
_version_ 1783736656849797120
author Singh, Inderjit
Joseph, Phillip
Heerdt, Paul M.
Cullinan, Marjorie
Lutchmansingh, Denyse D.
Gulati, Mridu
Possick, Jennifer D.
Systrom, David M.
Waxman, Aaron B.
author_facet Singh, Inderjit
Joseph, Phillip
Heerdt, Paul M.
Cullinan, Marjorie
Lutchmansingh, Denyse D.
Gulati, Mridu
Possick, Jennifer D.
Systrom, David M.
Waxman, Aaron B.
author_sort Singh, Inderjit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some patients with COVID-19 who have recovered from the acute infection after experiencing only mild symptoms continue to exhibit persistent exertional limitation that often is unexplained by conventional investigative studies. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the pathophysiologic mechanism of exercise intolerance that underlies the post-COVID-19 long-haul syndrome in patients without cardiopulmonary disease? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study examined the systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, ventilation, and gas exchange in 10 patients who recovered from COVID-19 and were without cardiopulmonary disease during invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) and compared the results with those from 10 age- and sex-matched control participants. These data then were used to define potential reasons for exertional limitation in the cohort of patients who had recovered from COVID-19. RESULTS: The patients who had recovered from COVID-19 exhibited markedly reduced peak exercise aerobic capacity (oxygen consumption [VO(2)]) compared with control participants (70 ± 11% predicted vs 131 ± 45% predicted; P < .0001). This reduction in peak VO(2) was associated with impaired systemic oxygen extraction (ie, narrow arterial-mixed venous oxygen content difference to arterial oxygen content ratio) compared with control participants (0.49 ± 0.1 vs 0.78 ± 0.1; P < .0001), despite a preserved peak cardiac index (7.8 ± 3.1 L/min vs 8.4±2.3 L/min; P > .05). Additionally, patients who had recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated greater ventilatory inefficiency (ie, abnormal ventilatory efficiency [VE/VCO(2)] slope: 35 ± 5 vs 27 ± 5; P = .01) compared with control participants without an increase in dead space ventilation. INTERPRETATION: Patients who have recovered from COVID-19 without cardiopulmonary disease demonstrate a marked reduction in peak VO(2) from a peripheral rather than a central cardiac limit, along with an exaggerated hyperventilatory response during exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8354807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83548072021-08-11 Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Singh, Inderjit Joseph, Phillip Heerdt, Paul M. Cullinan, Marjorie Lutchmansingh, Denyse D. Gulati, Mridu Possick, Jennifer D. Systrom, David M. Waxman, Aaron B. Chest Chest Infections: Original Research BACKGROUND: Some patients with COVID-19 who have recovered from the acute infection after experiencing only mild symptoms continue to exhibit persistent exertional limitation that often is unexplained by conventional investigative studies. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the pathophysiologic mechanism of exercise intolerance that underlies the post-COVID-19 long-haul syndrome in patients without cardiopulmonary disease? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study examined the systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, ventilation, and gas exchange in 10 patients who recovered from COVID-19 and were without cardiopulmonary disease during invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) and compared the results with those from 10 age- and sex-matched control participants. These data then were used to define potential reasons for exertional limitation in the cohort of patients who had recovered from COVID-19. RESULTS: The patients who had recovered from COVID-19 exhibited markedly reduced peak exercise aerobic capacity (oxygen consumption [VO(2)]) compared with control participants (70 ± 11% predicted vs 131 ± 45% predicted; P < .0001). This reduction in peak VO(2) was associated with impaired systemic oxygen extraction (ie, narrow arterial-mixed venous oxygen content difference to arterial oxygen content ratio) compared with control participants (0.49 ± 0.1 vs 0.78 ± 0.1; P < .0001), despite a preserved peak cardiac index (7.8 ± 3.1 L/min vs 8.4±2.3 L/min; P > .05). Additionally, patients who had recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated greater ventilatory inefficiency (ie, abnormal ventilatory efficiency [VE/VCO(2)] slope: 35 ± 5 vs 27 ± 5; P = .01) compared with control participants without an increase in dead space ventilation. INTERPRETATION: Patients who have recovered from COVID-19 without cardiopulmonary disease demonstrate a marked reduction in peak VO(2) from a peripheral rather than a central cardiac limit, along with an exaggerated hyperventilatory response during exercise. American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-01 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8354807/ /pubmed/34389297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.010 Text en © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Chest Infections: Original Research
Singh, Inderjit
Joseph, Phillip
Heerdt, Paul M.
Cullinan, Marjorie
Lutchmansingh, Denyse D.
Gulati, Mridu
Possick, Jennifer D.
Systrom, David M.
Waxman, Aaron B.
Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
title Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
title_full Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
title_fullStr Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
title_full_unstemmed Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
title_short Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
title_sort persistent exertional intolerance after covid-19: insights from invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing
topic Chest Infections: Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.010
work_keys_str_mv AT singhinderjit persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT josephphillip persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT heerdtpaulm persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT cullinanmarjorie persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT lutchmansinghdenysed persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT gulatimridu persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT possickjenniferd persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT systromdavidm persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting
AT waxmanaaronb persistentexertionalintoleranceaftercovid19insightsfrominvasivecardiopulmonaryexercisetesting