Cargando…

The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues

Own-perceived body matching – the ability to match one’s own body with an observed body – is a difficult task for both general and clinical populations. Thus far, however, own-perceived body matching has been investigated in situations that are incongruent with how we are used to experience and perc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Coster, Lize, Sánchez-Herrero, Pablo, López-Moreno, Jorge, Tajadura-Jiménez, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.701872
_version_ 1783736748478562304
author De Coster, Lize
Sánchez-Herrero, Pablo
López-Moreno, Jorge
Tajadura-Jiménez, Ana
author_facet De Coster, Lize
Sánchez-Herrero, Pablo
López-Moreno, Jorge
Tajadura-Jiménez, Ana
author_sort De Coster, Lize
collection PubMed
description Own-perceived body matching – the ability to match one’s own body with an observed body – is a difficult task for both general and clinical populations. Thus far, however, own-perceived body matching has been investigated in situations that are incongruent with how we are used to experience and perceive our body in daily life. In the current study, we aimed to examine own-perceived body matching in a context that more closely resembles real life. More specifically, we investigated the effects of body movement dynamics and clothing cues on own-perceived body matching. We asked participants to match their own body with an externally perceived body that was a 3D-generated avatar based on participants’ real bodies, fitted with a computer-generated dress. This perceived body was (1) either static (non-walking avatar) or dynamic (walking avatar), (2) either bigger, smaller, or the same size as participants’ own body size, and (3) fitted with a dress with a size either bigger, smaller, or the same as participants’ own dress size. Our results suggest that movement dynamics cues did not improve the accuracy of own-perceived body matching, but that confidence about dress fit was higher for dynamic avatars, and that the difference between dynamic and static avatars was dependent on participants’ self-esteem. Furthermore, when participants were asked to rate the observed body in reference to how they wanted to represent themselves to others, dynamic avatars were rated lower than static avatars for the biggest-sized bodies only, possibly reflecting the influence of movement cues on amplifying socio-cultural stereotypes. Finally, while smaller body/dress sizes were systematically rated higher than bigger body/dress sizes for several self-report items, the interplay between body and dress size played an important role in participants’ self-report as well. Thus, while our research suggests that movement and garment dynamics, allowing for realistic, concrete situations that are reminiscent of daily life, influence own-body perception, these cues did not lead to an improvement in accuracy. These findings provide important insights for research exploring (own-) body perception and bodily self-awareness, with practical (e.g., development of online avatars) and clinical (e.g., anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder) implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8355368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83553682021-08-12 The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues De Coster, Lize Sánchez-Herrero, Pablo López-Moreno, Jorge Tajadura-Jiménez, Ana Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Own-perceived body matching – the ability to match one’s own body with an observed body – is a difficult task for both general and clinical populations. Thus far, however, own-perceived body matching has been investigated in situations that are incongruent with how we are used to experience and perceive our body in daily life. In the current study, we aimed to examine own-perceived body matching in a context that more closely resembles real life. More specifically, we investigated the effects of body movement dynamics and clothing cues on own-perceived body matching. We asked participants to match their own body with an externally perceived body that was a 3D-generated avatar based on participants’ real bodies, fitted with a computer-generated dress. This perceived body was (1) either static (non-walking avatar) or dynamic (walking avatar), (2) either bigger, smaller, or the same size as participants’ own body size, and (3) fitted with a dress with a size either bigger, smaller, or the same as participants’ own dress size. Our results suggest that movement dynamics cues did not improve the accuracy of own-perceived body matching, but that confidence about dress fit was higher for dynamic avatars, and that the difference between dynamic and static avatars was dependent on participants’ self-esteem. Furthermore, when participants were asked to rate the observed body in reference to how they wanted to represent themselves to others, dynamic avatars were rated lower than static avatars for the biggest-sized bodies only, possibly reflecting the influence of movement cues on amplifying socio-cultural stereotypes. Finally, while smaller body/dress sizes were systematically rated higher than bigger body/dress sizes for several self-report items, the interplay between body and dress size played an important role in participants’ self-report as well. Thus, while our research suggests that movement and garment dynamics, allowing for realistic, concrete situations that are reminiscent of daily life, influence own-body perception, these cues did not lead to an improvement in accuracy. These findings provide important insights for research exploring (own-) body perception and bodily self-awareness, with practical (e.g., development of online avatars) and clinical (e.g., anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder) implications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8355368/ /pubmed/34393742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.701872 Text en Copyright © 2021 De Coster, Sánchez-Herrero, López-Moreno and Tajadura-Jiménez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
De Coster, Lize
Sánchez-Herrero, Pablo
López-Moreno, Jorge
Tajadura-Jiménez, Ana
The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues
title The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues
title_full The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues
title_fullStr The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues
title_full_unstemmed The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues
title_short The Perceived Match Between Observed and Own Bodies, but Not Its Accuracy, Is Influenced by Movement Dynamics and Clothing Cues
title_sort perceived match between observed and own bodies, but not its accuracy, is influenced by movement dynamics and clothing cues
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.701872
work_keys_str_mv AT decosterlize theperceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues
AT sanchezherreropablo theperceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues
AT lopezmorenojorge theperceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues
AT tajadurajimenezana theperceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues
AT decosterlize perceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues
AT sanchezherreropablo perceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues
AT lopezmorenojorge perceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues
AT tajadurajimenezana perceivedmatchbetweenobservedandownbodiesbutnotitsaccuracyisinfluencedbymovementdynamicsandclothingcues