Cargando…
Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP
The introduction of animals from a different environment or population is a common practice in commercial livestock populations. In this study, we modeled the inclusion of a group of external birds into a local broiler chicken population for the purpose of genomic evaluations. The pedigree was compo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab056 |
_version_ | 1783736768763265024 |
---|---|
author | Bermann, Matias Lourenco, Daniela Breen, Vivian Hawken, Rachel Brito Lopes, Fernando Misztal, Ignacy |
author_facet | Bermann, Matias Lourenco, Daniela Breen, Vivian Hawken, Rachel Brito Lopes, Fernando Misztal, Ignacy |
author_sort | Bermann, Matias |
collection | PubMed |
description | The introduction of animals from a different environment or population is a common practice in commercial livestock populations. In this study, we modeled the inclusion of a group of external birds into a local broiler chicken population for the purpose of genomic evaluations. The pedigree was composed of 242,413 birds and genotypes were available for 107,216 birds. A five-trait model that included one growth, two yield, and two efficiency traits was used for the analyses. The strategies to model the introduction of external birds were to include a fixed effect representing the origin of parents and to use unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF). Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were obtained with single-step GBLUP using the Algorithm for Proven and Young. Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of GEBV for the validation birds, that is, from the most recent generation, were computed. The bias and dispersion were estimated with the linear regression (LR) method,whereas accuracy was estimated by the LR method and predictive ability. When fixed UPG were fit without estimated inbreeding, the model did not converge. In contrast, models with fixed UPG and estimated inbreeding or random UPG converged and resulted in similar GEBV. The inclusion of an extra fixed effect in the model made the GEBV unbiased and reduced the inflation. Genomic predictions with MF were slightly biased and inflated due to the unbalanced number of observations assigned to each metafounder. When combining local and external populations, the greatest accuracy can be obtained by adding an extra fixed effect to account for the origin of parents plus UPG with estimated inbreeding or random UPG. To estimate the accuracy, the LR method is more consistent among scenarios, whereas the predictive ability greatly depends on the model specification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8355479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83554792021-08-11 Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP Bermann, Matias Lourenco, Daniela Breen, Vivian Hawken, Rachel Brito Lopes, Fernando Misztal, Ignacy J Anim Sci Animal Genetics and Genomics The introduction of animals from a different environment or population is a common practice in commercial livestock populations. In this study, we modeled the inclusion of a group of external birds into a local broiler chicken population for the purpose of genomic evaluations. The pedigree was composed of 242,413 birds and genotypes were available for 107,216 birds. A five-trait model that included one growth, two yield, and two efficiency traits was used for the analyses. The strategies to model the introduction of external birds were to include a fixed effect representing the origin of parents and to use unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF). Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were obtained with single-step GBLUP using the Algorithm for Proven and Young. Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of GEBV for the validation birds, that is, from the most recent generation, were computed. The bias and dispersion were estimated with the linear regression (LR) method,whereas accuracy was estimated by the LR method and predictive ability. When fixed UPG were fit without estimated inbreeding, the model did not converge. In contrast, models with fixed UPG and estimated inbreeding or random UPG converged and resulted in similar GEBV. The inclusion of an extra fixed effect in the model made the GEBV unbiased and reduced the inflation. Genomic predictions with MF were slightly biased and inflated due to the unbalanced number of observations assigned to each metafounder. When combining local and external populations, the greatest accuracy can be obtained by adding an extra fixed effect to account for the origin of parents plus UPG with estimated inbreeding or random UPG. To estimate the accuracy, the LR method is more consistent among scenarios, whereas the predictive ability greatly depends on the model specification. Oxford University Press 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8355479/ /pubmed/33649764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab056 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Animal Genetics and Genomics Bermann, Matias Lourenco, Daniela Breen, Vivian Hawken, Rachel Brito Lopes, Fernando Misztal, Ignacy Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP |
title | Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP |
title_full | Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP |
title_fullStr | Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP |
title_short | Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP |
title_sort | modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step gblup |
topic | Animal Genetics and Genomics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bermannmatias modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup AT lourencodaniela modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup AT breenvivian modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup AT hawkenrachel modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup AT britolopesfernando modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup AT misztalignacy modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup |