Cargando…

Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP

The introduction of animals from a different environment or population is a common practice in commercial livestock populations. In this study, we modeled the inclusion of a group of external birds into a local broiler chicken population for the purpose of genomic evaluations. The pedigree was compo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bermann, Matias, Lourenco, Daniela, Breen, Vivian, Hawken, Rachel, Brito Lopes, Fernando, Misztal, Ignacy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab056
_version_ 1783736768763265024
author Bermann, Matias
Lourenco, Daniela
Breen, Vivian
Hawken, Rachel
Brito Lopes, Fernando
Misztal, Ignacy
author_facet Bermann, Matias
Lourenco, Daniela
Breen, Vivian
Hawken, Rachel
Brito Lopes, Fernando
Misztal, Ignacy
author_sort Bermann, Matias
collection PubMed
description The introduction of animals from a different environment or population is a common practice in commercial livestock populations. In this study, we modeled the inclusion of a group of external birds into a local broiler chicken population for the purpose of genomic evaluations. The pedigree was composed of 242,413 birds and genotypes were available for 107,216 birds. A five-trait model that included one growth, two yield, and two efficiency traits was used for the analyses. The strategies to model the introduction of external birds were to include a fixed effect representing the origin of parents and to use unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF). Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were obtained with single-step GBLUP using the Algorithm for Proven and Young. Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of GEBV for the validation birds, that is, from the most recent generation, were computed. The bias and dispersion were estimated with the linear regression (LR) method,whereas accuracy was estimated by the LR method and predictive ability. When fixed UPG were fit without estimated inbreeding, the model did not converge. In contrast, models with fixed UPG and estimated inbreeding or random UPG converged and resulted in similar GEBV. The inclusion of an extra fixed effect in the model made the GEBV unbiased and reduced the inflation. Genomic predictions with MF were slightly biased and inflated due to the unbalanced number of observations assigned to each metafounder. When combining local and external populations, the greatest accuracy can be obtained by adding an extra fixed effect to account for the origin of parents plus UPG with estimated inbreeding or random UPG. To estimate the accuracy, the LR method is more consistent among scenarios, whereas the predictive ability greatly depends on the model specification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8355479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83554792021-08-11 Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP Bermann, Matias Lourenco, Daniela Breen, Vivian Hawken, Rachel Brito Lopes, Fernando Misztal, Ignacy J Anim Sci Animal Genetics and Genomics The introduction of animals from a different environment or population is a common practice in commercial livestock populations. In this study, we modeled the inclusion of a group of external birds into a local broiler chicken population for the purpose of genomic evaluations. The pedigree was composed of 242,413 birds and genotypes were available for 107,216 birds. A five-trait model that included one growth, two yield, and two efficiency traits was used for the analyses. The strategies to model the introduction of external birds were to include a fixed effect representing the origin of parents and to use unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF). Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were obtained with single-step GBLUP using the Algorithm for Proven and Young. Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of GEBV for the validation birds, that is, from the most recent generation, were computed. The bias and dispersion were estimated with the linear regression (LR) method,whereas accuracy was estimated by the LR method and predictive ability. When fixed UPG were fit without estimated inbreeding, the model did not converge. In contrast, models with fixed UPG and estimated inbreeding or random UPG converged and resulted in similar GEBV. The inclusion of an extra fixed effect in the model made the GEBV unbiased and reduced the inflation. Genomic predictions with MF were slightly biased and inflated due to the unbalanced number of observations assigned to each metafounder. When combining local and external populations, the greatest accuracy can be obtained by adding an extra fixed effect to account for the origin of parents plus UPG with estimated inbreeding or random UPG. To estimate the accuracy, the LR method is more consistent among scenarios, whereas the predictive ability greatly depends on the model specification. Oxford University Press 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8355479/ /pubmed/33649764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab056 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Animal Genetics and Genomics
Bermann, Matias
Lourenco, Daniela
Breen, Vivian
Hawken, Rachel
Brito Lopes, Fernando
Misztal, Ignacy
Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP
title Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP
title_full Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP
title_fullStr Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP
title_full_unstemmed Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP
title_short Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP
title_sort modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step gblup
topic Animal Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab056
work_keys_str_mv AT bermannmatias modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup
AT lourencodaniela modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup
AT breenvivian modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup
AT hawkenrachel modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup
AT britolopesfernando modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup
AT misztalignacy modelinggeneticdifferencesofcombinedbroilerchickenpopulationsinsinglestepgblup