Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams

Many and varied methods currently exist for featurization, which is the process of mapping persistence diagrams to Euclidean space, with the goal of maximally preserving structure. However, and to our knowledge, there are presently no methodical comparisons of existing approaches, nor a standardized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, Danielle, Polanco, Luis, Perea, Jose A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.681174
_version_ 1783736778731028480
author Barnes, Danielle
Polanco, Luis
Perea, Jose A.
author_facet Barnes, Danielle
Polanco, Luis
Perea, Jose A.
author_sort Barnes, Danielle
collection PubMed
description Many and varied methods currently exist for featurization, which is the process of mapping persistence diagrams to Euclidean space, with the goal of maximally preserving structure. However, and to our knowledge, there are presently no methodical comparisons of existing approaches, nor a standardized collection of test data sets. This paper provides a comparative study of several such methods. In particular, we review, evaluate, and compare the stable multi-scale kernel, persistence landscapes, persistence images, the ring of algebraic functions, template functions, and adaptive template systems. Using these approaches for feature extraction, we apply and compare popular machine learning methods on five data sets: MNIST, Shape retrieval of non-rigid 3D Human Models (SHREC14), extracts from the Protein Classification Benchmark Collection (Protein), MPEG7 shape matching, and HAM10000 skin lesion data set. These data sets are commonly used in the above methods for featurization, and we use them to evaluate predictive utility in real-world applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8355525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83555252021-08-12 A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams Barnes, Danielle Polanco, Luis Perea, Jose A. Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence Many and varied methods currently exist for featurization, which is the process of mapping persistence diagrams to Euclidean space, with the goal of maximally preserving structure. However, and to our knowledge, there are presently no methodical comparisons of existing approaches, nor a standardized collection of test data sets. This paper provides a comparative study of several such methods. In particular, we review, evaluate, and compare the stable multi-scale kernel, persistence landscapes, persistence images, the ring of algebraic functions, template functions, and adaptive template systems. Using these approaches for feature extraction, we apply and compare popular machine learning methods on five data sets: MNIST, Shape retrieval of non-rigid 3D Human Models (SHREC14), extracts from the Protein Classification Benchmark Collection (Protein), MPEG7 shape matching, and HAM10000 skin lesion data set. These data sets are commonly used in the above methods for featurization, and we use them to evaluate predictive utility in real-world applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8355525/ /pubmed/34396089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.681174 Text en Copyright © 2021 Barnes, Polanco and Perea. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Barnes, Danielle
Polanco, Luis
Perea, Jose A.
A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
title A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
title_full A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
title_short A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
title_sort comparative study of machine learning methods for persistence diagrams
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.681174
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesdanielle acomparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams
AT polancoluis acomparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams
AT pereajosea acomparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams
AT barnesdanielle comparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams
AT polancoluis comparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams
AT pereajosea comparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams