Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
Many and varied methods currently exist for featurization, which is the process of mapping persistence diagrams to Euclidean space, with the goal of maximally preserving structure. However, and to our knowledge, there are presently no methodical comparisons of existing approaches, nor a standardized...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.681174 |
_version_ | 1783736778731028480 |
---|---|
author | Barnes, Danielle Polanco, Luis Perea, Jose A. |
author_facet | Barnes, Danielle Polanco, Luis Perea, Jose A. |
author_sort | Barnes, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many and varied methods currently exist for featurization, which is the process of mapping persistence diagrams to Euclidean space, with the goal of maximally preserving structure. However, and to our knowledge, there are presently no methodical comparisons of existing approaches, nor a standardized collection of test data sets. This paper provides a comparative study of several such methods. In particular, we review, evaluate, and compare the stable multi-scale kernel, persistence landscapes, persistence images, the ring of algebraic functions, template functions, and adaptive template systems. Using these approaches for feature extraction, we apply and compare popular machine learning methods on five data sets: MNIST, Shape retrieval of non-rigid 3D Human Models (SHREC14), extracts from the Protein Classification Benchmark Collection (Protein), MPEG7 shape matching, and HAM10000 skin lesion data set. These data sets are commonly used in the above methods for featurization, and we use them to evaluate predictive utility in real-world applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8355525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83555252021-08-12 A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams Barnes, Danielle Polanco, Luis Perea, Jose A. Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence Many and varied methods currently exist for featurization, which is the process of mapping persistence diagrams to Euclidean space, with the goal of maximally preserving structure. However, and to our knowledge, there are presently no methodical comparisons of existing approaches, nor a standardized collection of test data sets. This paper provides a comparative study of several such methods. In particular, we review, evaluate, and compare the stable multi-scale kernel, persistence landscapes, persistence images, the ring of algebraic functions, template functions, and adaptive template systems. Using these approaches for feature extraction, we apply and compare popular machine learning methods on five data sets: MNIST, Shape retrieval of non-rigid 3D Human Models (SHREC14), extracts from the Protein Classification Benchmark Collection (Protein), MPEG7 shape matching, and HAM10000 skin lesion data set. These data sets are commonly used in the above methods for featurization, and we use them to evaluate predictive utility in real-world applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8355525/ /pubmed/34396089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.681174 Text en Copyright © 2021 Barnes, Polanco and Perea. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Artificial Intelligence Barnes, Danielle Polanco, Luis Perea, Jose A. A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams |
title | A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams |
title_sort | comparative study of machine learning methods for persistence diagrams |
topic | Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.681174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnesdanielle acomparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams AT polancoluis acomparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams AT pereajosea acomparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams AT barnesdanielle comparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams AT polancoluis comparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams AT pereajosea comparativestudyofmachinelearningmethodsforpersistencediagrams |