Cargando…

Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity

Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy, previously known as low-level laser therapy, was discovered more than 50 years ago, yet there is still no agreement on the parameters and protocols for its clinical application. Some groups have recommended the use of a power density less than [Formula: see text] an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zein, Randa, Selting, Wayne, Hamblin, Michael R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30550048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.120901
_version_ 1783736825725059072
author Zein, Randa
Selting, Wayne
Hamblin, Michael R.
author_facet Zein, Randa
Selting, Wayne
Hamblin, Michael R.
author_sort Zein, Randa
collection PubMed
description Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy, previously known as low-level laser therapy, was discovered more than 50 years ago, yet there is still no agreement on the parameters and protocols for its clinical application. Some groups have recommended the use of a power density less than [Formula: see text] and an energy density of 4 to [Formula: see text] at the level of the target tissue. Others recommend as much as [Formula: see text] at the tissue surface. The wide range of parameters that can be applied (wavelength, energy, fluence, power, irradiance, pulse mode, treatment duration, and repetition) in some cases has led to contradictory results. In our review, we attempt to evaluate the range of effective and ineffective parameters in PBM. Studies in vitro with cultured cells or in vivo with different tissues were divided into those with higher numbers of mitochondria (muscle, brain, heart, nerve) or lower numbers of mitochondria (skin, tendon, cartilage). Graphs were plotted of energy density against power density. Although the results showed a high degree of variability, cells/tissues with high numbers of mitochondria tended to respond to lower doses of light than those with lower number of mitochondria. Ineffective studies in cells with high mitochondrial activity appeared to be more often due to over-dosing than to under-dosing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8355782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83557822021-08-11 Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity Zein, Randa Selting, Wayne Hamblin, Michael R. J Biomed Opt Review Papers Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy, previously known as low-level laser therapy, was discovered more than 50 years ago, yet there is still no agreement on the parameters and protocols for its clinical application. Some groups have recommended the use of a power density less than [Formula: see text] and an energy density of 4 to [Formula: see text] at the level of the target tissue. Others recommend as much as [Formula: see text] at the tissue surface. The wide range of parameters that can be applied (wavelength, energy, fluence, power, irradiance, pulse mode, treatment duration, and repetition) in some cases has led to contradictory results. In our review, we attempt to evaluate the range of effective and ineffective parameters in PBM. Studies in vitro with cultured cells or in vivo with different tissues were divided into those with higher numbers of mitochondria (muscle, brain, heart, nerve) or lower numbers of mitochondria (skin, tendon, cartilage). Graphs were plotted of energy density against power density. Although the results showed a high degree of variability, cells/tissues with high numbers of mitochondria tended to respond to lower doses of light than those with lower number of mitochondria. Ineffective studies in cells with high mitochondrial activity appeared to be more often due to over-dosing than to under-dosing. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2018-12-11 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8355782/ /pubmed/30550048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.120901 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Review Papers
Zein, Randa
Selting, Wayne
Hamblin, Michael R.
Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity
title Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity
title_full Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity
title_fullStr Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity
title_full_unstemmed Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity
title_short Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity
title_sort review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity
topic Review Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30550048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.120901
work_keys_str_mv AT zeinranda reviewoflightparametersandphotobiomodulationefficacydiveintocomplexity
AT seltingwayne reviewoflightparametersandphotobiomodulationefficacydiveintocomplexity
AT hamblinmichaelr reviewoflightparametersandphotobiomodulationefficacydiveintocomplexity