Cargando…

Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats

The design principles of institutions that visibly and significantly affect citizens’ lives are likely to be politically salient. Popular support for these principles is in turn crucial for institutional viability and effectiveness. Transboundary pandemics are a case in point. Understanding citizens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanhuysse, Pieter, Jankowski, Michael, Tepe, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1
_version_ 1783736833976303616
author Vanhuysse, Pieter
Jankowski, Michael
Tepe, Markus
author_facet Vanhuysse, Pieter
Jankowski, Michael
Tepe, Markus
author_sort Vanhuysse, Pieter
collection PubMed
description The design principles of institutions that visibly and significantly affect citizens’ lives are likely to be politically salient. Popular support for these principles is in turn crucial for institutional viability and effectiveness. Transboundary pandemics are a case in point. Understanding citizens’ preferences regarding the design of international alliances set up to mass-produce and distribute vaccines is likely to determine citizens’ subsequent cooperation with vaccination campaigns. This study explores Germans’ preferences for international COVID-19 vaccine alliance design principles. We conducted a conjoint experiment at a recurring cognitive moment in many pandemics’ cycles, between the initial outbreak and a more devastating but still-unknown second wave, when infection rates were very low, yet no policy solutions had been developed. We analyzed preferences regarding four building blocks: (1) alliance composition (size; EU-centrism), (2) alliance distribution rules (joining cost; vaccine allocation), (3) vaccine nationalism (cost per German household; coverage in Germany) and (4) vaccine producer confidence (origin; type). Distribution rules, political ideology and personal perceptions of pandemic threat matter little. But a larger alliance size and dominant EU-country composition increase alliance support. And vaccine nationalism is key: support increases with both lower costs and larger coverage for own-nation citizens. Moreover, support goes down for Chinese and American producers and increases for Swiss and especially own-nation producers. In sum, a realist and technocratic outlook is warranted at the cognitive stage in pandemic cycles when no solutions have been found, yet the worst already seems to be over, as national self-interest reigns supreme in popular attitudes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8355869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83558692021-08-11 Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats Vanhuysse, Pieter Jankowski, Michael Tepe, Markus Policy Sci Discussion and Commentary The design principles of institutions that visibly and significantly affect citizens’ lives are likely to be politically salient. Popular support for these principles is in turn crucial for institutional viability and effectiveness. Transboundary pandemics are a case in point. Understanding citizens’ preferences regarding the design of international alliances set up to mass-produce and distribute vaccines is likely to determine citizens’ subsequent cooperation with vaccination campaigns. This study explores Germans’ preferences for international COVID-19 vaccine alliance design principles. We conducted a conjoint experiment at a recurring cognitive moment in many pandemics’ cycles, between the initial outbreak and a more devastating but still-unknown second wave, when infection rates were very low, yet no policy solutions had been developed. We analyzed preferences regarding four building blocks: (1) alliance composition (size; EU-centrism), (2) alliance distribution rules (joining cost; vaccine allocation), (3) vaccine nationalism (cost per German household; coverage in Germany) and (4) vaccine producer confidence (origin; type). Distribution rules, political ideology and personal perceptions of pandemic threat matter little. But a larger alliance size and dominant EU-country composition increase alliance support. And vaccine nationalism is key: support increases with both lower costs and larger coverage for own-nation citizens. Moreover, support goes down for Chinese and American producers and increases for Swiss and especially own-nation producers. In sum, a realist and technocratic outlook is warranted at the cognitive stage in pandemic cycles when no solutions have been found, yet the worst already seems to be over, as national self-interest reigns supreme in popular attitudes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1. Springer US 2021-08-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8355869/ /pubmed/34393278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Discussion and Commentary
Vanhuysse, Pieter
Jankowski, Michael
Tepe, Markus
Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats
title Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats
title_full Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats
title_fullStr Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats
title_full_unstemmed Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats
title_short Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats
title_sort vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international covid-19 cooperation formats
topic Discussion and Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhuyssepieter vaccinealliancebuildingblocksaconjointexperimentonpopularsupportforinternationalcovid19cooperationformats
AT jankowskimichael vaccinealliancebuildingblocksaconjointexperimentonpopularsupportforinternationalcovid19cooperationformats
AT tepemarkus vaccinealliancebuildingblocksaconjointexperimentonpopularsupportforinternationalcovid19cooperationformats