Cargando…
Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats
The design principles of institutions that visibly and significantly affect citizens’ lives are likely to be politically salient. Popular support for these principles is in turn crucial for institutional viability and effectiveness. Transboundary pandemics are a case in point. Understanding citizens...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1 |
_version_ | 1783736833976303616 |
---|---|
author | Vanhuysse, Pieter Jankowski, Michael Tepe, Markus |
author_facet | Vanhuysse, Pieter Jankowski, Michael Tepe, Markus |
author_sort | Vanhuysse, Pieter |
collection | PubMed |
description | The design principles of institutions that visibly and significantly affect citizens’ lives are likely to be politically salient. Popular support for these principles is in turn crucial for institutional viability and effectiveness. Transboundary pandemics are a case in point. Understanding citizens’ preferences regarding the design of international alliances set up to mass-produce and distribute vaccines is likely to determine citizens’ subsequent cooperation with vaccination campaigns. This study explores Germans’ preferences for international COVID-19 vaccine alliance design principles. We conducted a conjoint experiment at a recurring cognitive moment in many pandemics’ cycles, between the initial outbreak and a more devastating but still-unknown second wave, when infection rates were very low, yet no policy solutions had been developed. We analyzed preferences regarding four building blocks: (1) alliance composition (size; EU-centrism), (2) alliance distribution rules (joining cost; vaccine allocation), (3) vaccine nationalism (cost per German household; coverage in Germany) and (4) vaccine producer confidence (origin; type). Distribution rules, political ideology and personal perceptions of pandemic threat matter little. But a larger alliance size and dominant EU-country composition increase alliance support. And vaccine nationalism is key: support increases with both lower costs and larger coverage for own-nation citizens. Moreover, support goes down for Chinese and American producers and increases for Swiss and especially own-nation producers. In sum, a realist and technocratic outlook is warranted at the cognitive stage in pandemic cycles when no solutions have been found, yet the worst already seems to be over, as national self-interest reigns supreme in popular attitudes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8355869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83558692021-08-11 Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats Vanhuysse, Pieter Jankowski, Michael Tepe, Markus Policy Sci Discussion and Commentary The design principles of institutions that visibly and significantly affect citizens’ lives are likely to be politically salient. Popular support for these principles is in turn crucial for institutional viability and effectiveness. Transboundary pandemics are a case in point. Understanding citizens’ preferences regarding the design of international alliances set up to mass-produce and distribute vaccines is likely to determine citizens’ subsequent cooperation with vaccination campaigns. This study explores Germans’ preferences for international COVID-19 vaccine alliance design principles. We conducted a conjoint experiment at a recurring cognitive moment in many pandemics’ cycles, between the initial outbreak and a more devastating but still-unknown second wave, when infection rates were very low, yet no policy solutions had been developed. We analyzed preferences regarding four building blocks: (1) alliance composition (size; EU-centrism), (2) alliance distribution rules (joining cost; vaccine allocation), (3) vaccine nationalism (cost per German household; coverage in Germany) and (4) vaccine producer confidence (origin; type). Distribution rules, political ideology and personal perceptions of pandemic threat matter little. But a larger alliance size and dominant EU-country composition increase alliance support. And vaccine nationalism is key: support increases with both lower costs and larger coverage for own-nation citizens. Moreover, support goes down for Chinese and American producers and increases for Swiss and especially own-nation producers. In sum, a realist and technocratic outlook is warranted at the cognitive stage in pandemic cycles when no solutions have been found, yet the worst already seems to be over, as national self-interest reigns supreme in popular attitudes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1. Springer US 2021-08-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8355869/ /pubmed/34393278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Discussion and Commentary Vanhuysse, Pieter Jankowski, Michael Tepe, Markus Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats |
title | Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats |
title_full | Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats |
title_fullStr | Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats |
title_short | Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats |
title_sort | vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international covid-19 cooperation formats |
topic | Discussion and Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09435-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhuyssepieter vaccinealliancebuildingblocksaconjointexperimentonpopularsupportforinternationalcovid19cooperationformats AT jankowskimichael vaccinealliancebuildingblocksaconjointexperimentonpopularsupportforinternationalcovid19cooperationformats AT tepemarkus vaccinealliancebuildingblocksaconjointexperimentonpopularsupportforinternationalcovid19cooperationformats |