Cargando…

Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T

BACKGROUND: Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a tumor vaccine may modulate the immune system to leverage complementary mechanisms of action that lead to sustained T-cell activation and a potent prolonged immunotherapeutic response in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorff, Tanya, Hirasawa, Yosuke, Acoba, Jared, Pagano, Ian, Tamura, David, Pal, Sumanta, Zhang, Minlu, Waitz, Rebecca, Dhal, Abhilash, Haynes, Winston, Shon, John, Scholz, Mark, Furuya, Hideki, Chan, Owen T M, Huang, Jeffrey, Rosser, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-002931
_version_ 1783736899215556608
author Dorff, Tanya
Hirasawa, Yosuke
Acoba, Jared
Pagano, Ian
Tamura, David
Pal, Sumanta
Zhang, Minlu
Waitz, Rebecca
Dhal, Abhilash
Haynes, Winston
Shon, John
Scholz, Mark
Furuya, Hideki
Chan, Owen T M
Huang, Jeffrey
Rosser, Charles
author_facet Dorff, Tanya
Hirasawa, Yosuke
Acoba, Jared
Pagano, Ian
Tamura, David
Pal, Sumanta
Zhang, Minlu
Waitz, Rebecca
Dhal, Abhilash
Haynes, Winston
Shon, John
Scholz, Mark
Furuya, Hideki
Chan, Owen T M
Huang, Jeffrey
Rosser, Charles
author_sort Dorff, Tanya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a tumor vaccine may modulate the immune system to leverage complementary mechanisms of action that lead to sustained T-cell activation and a potent prolonged immunotherapeutic response in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: Subjects with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either atezolizumab followed by sipuleucel-T (Arm 1) or sipuleucel-T followed by atezolizumab (Arm 2). The primary endpoint was safety, while secondary endpoints included preliminary clinical activity such as objective tumor response and systemic immune responses that could identify key molecular and immunological changes associated with sequential administration of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T. RESULTS: A total of 37 subjects were enrolled. The median age was 75.0 years, median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 21.9 ng/mL, and subjects had a median number of three prior treatments. Most subjects (83.8%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities attributed to either study drug. Immune-related adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 13.5% of subjects, and all of which were grade 1 or 2. Of 23 subjects with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors measurable disease, only one subject in Arm 2 had a partial response (PR) and four subjects overall had stable disease (SD) at 6 months reflecting an objective response rate of 4.3% and a disease control rate of 21.7%. T-cell receptor diversity was higher in subjects with a response, including SD. Immune response to three novel putative antigens (SIK3, KDM1A/LSD1, and PIK3R6) appeared to increase with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, regardless of the order in which they were administered, the combination of atezolizumab with sipuleucel-T appears to be safe and well tolerated with a comparable safety profile to each agent administered as monotherapy. Correlative immune studies may suggest the combination to be beneficial; however, further studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03024216.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8356194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83561942021-08-24 Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T Dorff, Tanya Hirasawa, Yosuke Acoba, Jared Pagano, Ian Tamura, David Pal, Sumanta Zhang, Minlu Waitz, Rebecca Dhal, Abhilash Haynes, Winston Shon, John Scholz, Mark Furuya, Hideki Chan, Owen T M Huang, Jeffrey Rosser, Charles J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a tumor vaccine may modulate the immune system to leverage complementary mechanisms of action that lead to sustained T-cell activation and a potent prolonged immunotherapeutic response in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: Subjects with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either atezolizumab followed by sipuleucel-T (Arm 1) or sipuleucel-T followed by atezolizumab (Arm 2). The primary endpoint was safety, while secondary endpoints included preliminary clinical activity such as objective tumor response and systemic immune responses that could identify key molecular and immunological changes associated with sequential administration of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T. RESULTS: A total of 37 subjects were enrolled. The median age was 75.0 years, median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 21.9 ng/mL, and subjects had a median number of three prior treatments. Most subjects (83.8%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities attributed to either study drug. Immune-related adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 13.5% of subjects, and all of which were grade 1 or 2. Of 23 subjects with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors measurable disease, only one subject in Arm 2 had a partial response (PR) and four subjects overall had stable disease (SD) at 6 months reflecting an objective response rate of 4.3% and a disease control rate of 21.7%. T-cell receptor diversity was higher in subjects with a response, including SD. Immune response to three novel putative antigens (SIK3, KDM1A/LSD1, and PIK3R6) appeared to increase with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, regardless of the order in which they were administered, the combination of atezolizumab with sipuleucel-T appears to be safe and well tolerated with a comparable safety profile to each agent administered as monotherapy. Correlative immune studies may suggest the combination to be beneficial; however, further studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03024216. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8356194/ /pubmed/34376554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-002931 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
Dorff, Tanya
Hirasawa, Yosuke
Acoba, Jared
Pagano, Ian
Tamura, David
Pal, Sumanta
Zhang, Minlu
Waitz, Rebecca
Dhal, Abhilash
Haynes, Winston
Shon, John
Scholz, Mark
Furuya, Hideki
Chan, Owen T M
Huang, Jeffrey
Rosser, Charles
Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T
title Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T
title_full Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T
title_fullStr Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T
title_full_unstemmed Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T
title_short Phase Ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T
title_sort phase ib study of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with different sequencing regimens of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-t
topic Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-002931
work_keys_str_mv AT dorfftanya phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT hirasawayosuke phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT acobajared phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT paganoian phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT tamuradavid phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT palsumanta phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT zhangminlu phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT waitzrebecca phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT dhalabhilash phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT hayneswinston phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT shonjohn phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT scholzmark phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT furuyahideki phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT chanowentm phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT huangjeffrey phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt
AT rossercharles phaseibstudyofpatientswithmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancertreatedwithdifferentsequencingregimensofatezolizumabandsipuleucelt