Cargando…
Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion
Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435145 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0179 |
_version_ | 1783736905819488256 |
---|---|
author | Fiani, Brian Siddiqi, Imran Chacon, Daniel Figueras, Ryan Arthur Rippe, Preston Kortz, Michael Runnels, Juliana |
author_facet | Fiani, Brian Siddiqi, Imran Chacon, Daniel Figueras, Ryan Arthur Rippe, Preston Kortz, Michael Runnels, Juliana |
author_sort | Fiani, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), have historically been the standard of practice. A recent paradigm shift in spinal surgery has led to the investigation of minimally invasive approaches to mitigate tissue damage without compromising outcomes. This extensive review aims to examine current clinical and biomechanical evidence on the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to an axial lumbosacral interbody fusion. Since this technique was first described in 2004, accumulating evidence suggests it results in high fusion rates, consistent improvements in pain and function, reduced perioperative morbidity, and low rates of complication. Although early clinical outcomes have been promising, there is a paucity of comparative data investigating outcomes of the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to traditional alternatives and other minimally invasive techniques. Here, we summarize current evidence and discuss pertinent topics for the spinal surgeon considering this novel approach, including indications, advantages, relevant anatomy, contraindications, and technical considerations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8356233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83562332021-08-24 Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion Fiani, Brian Siddiqi, Imran Chacon, Daniel Figueras, Ryan Arthur Rippe, Preston Kortz, Michael Runnels, Juliana Spine Surg Relat Res Review Article Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), have historically been the standard of practice. A recent paradigm shift in spinal surgery has led to the investigation of minimally invasive approaches to mitigate tissue damage without compromising outcomes. This extensive review aims to examine current clinical and biomechanical evidence on the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to an axial lumbosacral interbody fusion. Since this technique was first described in 2004, accumulating evidence suggests it results in high fusion rates, consistent improvements in pain and function, reduced perioperative morbidity, and low rates of complication. Although early clinical outcomes have been promising, there is a paucity of comparative data investigating outcomes of the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to traditional alternatives and other minimally invasive techniques. Here, we summarize current evidence and discuss pertinent topics for the spinal surgeon considering this novel approach, including indications, advantages, relevant anatomy, contraindications, and technical considerations. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8356233/ /pubmed/34435145 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0179 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Fiani, Brian Siddiqi, Imran Chacon, Daniel Figueras, Ryan Arthur Rippe, Preston Kortz, Michael Runnels, Juliana Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion |
title | Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion |
title_full | Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion |
title_fullStr | Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion |
title_short | Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion |
title_sort | paracoccygeal transsacral approach: a rare approach for axial lumbosacral interbody fusion |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435145 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fianibrian paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion AT siddiqiimran paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion AT chacondaniel paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion AT figuerasryanarthur paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion AT rippepreston paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion AT kortzmichael paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion AT runnelsjuliana paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion |