Cargando…

Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion

Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiani, Brian, Siddiqi, Imran, Chacon, Daniel, Figueras, Ryan Arthur, Rippe, Preston, Kortz, Michael, Runnels, Juliana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435145
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0179
_version_ 1783736905819488256
author Fiani, Brian
Siddiqi, Imran
Chacon, Daniel
Figueras, Ryan Arthur
Rippe, Preston
Kortz, Michael
Runnels, Juliana
author_facet Fiani, Brian
Siddiqi, Imran
Chacon, Daniel
Figueras, Ryan Arthur
Rippe, Preston
Kortz, Michael
Runnels, Juliana
author_sort Fiani, Brian
collection PubMed
description Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), have historically been the standard of practice. A recent paradigm shift in spinal surgery has led to the investigation of minimally invasive approaches to mitigate tissue damage without compromising outcomes. This extensive review aims to examine current clinical and biomechanical evidence on the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to an axial lumbosacral interbody fusion. Since this technique was first described in 2004, accumulating evidence suggests it results in high fusion rates, consistent improvements in pain and function, reduced perioperative morbidity, and low rates of complication. Although early clinical outcomes have been promising, there is a paucity of comparative data investigating outcomes of the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to traditional alternatives and other minimally invasive techniques. Here, we summarize current evidence and discuss pertinent topics for the spinal surgeon considering this novel approach, including indications, advantages, relevant anatomy, contraindications, and technical considerations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8356233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83562332021-08-24 Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion Fiani, Brian Siddiqi, Imran Chacon, Daniel Figueras, Ryan Arthur Rippe, Preston Kortz, Michael Runnels, Juliana Spine Surg Relat Res Review Article Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), have historically been the standard of practice. A recent paradigm shift in spinal surgery has led to the investigation of minimally invasive approaches to mitigate tissue damage without compromising outcomes. This extensive review aims to examine current clinical and biomechanical evidence on the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to an axial lumbosacral interbody fusion. Since this technique was first described in 2004, accumulating evidence suggests it results in high fusion rates, consistent improvements in pain and function, reduced perioperative morbidity, and low rates of complication. Although early clinical outcomes have been promising, there is a paucity of comparative data investigating outcomes of the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to traditional alternatives and other minimally invasive techniques. Here, we summarize current evidence and discuss pertinent topics for the spinal surgeon considering this novel approach, including indications, advantages, relevant anatomy, contraindications, and technical considerations. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8356233/ /pubmed/34435145 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0179 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Fiani, Brian
Siddiqi, Imran
Chacon, Daniel
Figueras, Ryan Arthur
Rippe, Preston
Kortz, Michael
Runnels, Juliana
Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion
title Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion
title_full Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion
title_short Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion
title_sort paracoccygeal transsacral approach: a rare approach for axial lumbosacral interbody fusion
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435145
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0179
work_keys_str_mv AT fianibrian paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion
AT siddiqiimran paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion
AT chacondaniel paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion
AT figuerasryanarthur paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion
AT rippepreston paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion
AT kortzmichael paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion
AT runnelsjuliana paracoccygealtranssacralapproacharareapproachforaxiallumbosacralinterbodyfusion