Cargando…

Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

INTRODUCTION: Revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after surgical treatment is at times challenging due to epidural adhesions and scar. This study aimed to review the clinical results and safety of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy via interlaminar (FELD-IL) and transforaminal (FELD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshikane, Koichi, Kikuchi, Katsuhiko, Izumi, Teiyu, Okazaki, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435151
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0159
_version_ 1783736908152569856
author Yoshikane, Koichi
Kikuchi, Katsuhiko
Izumi, Teiyu
Okazaki, Ken
author_facet Yoshikane, Koichi
Kikuchi, Katsuhiko
Izumi, Teiyu
Okazaki, Ken
author_sort Yoshikane, Koichi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after surgical treatment is at times challenging due to epidural adhesions and scar. This study aimed to review the clinical results and safety of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy via interlaminar (FELD-IL) and transforaminal (FELD-TF) approaches for revision surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 52 lumbar disc herniation revision patients (mean age, 51.8 years; male/female, 13/39), with 17 FELD-IL and 35 FELD-TF cases. Complication incidences were assessed by reviewing surgical videos and postoperative magnetic resonance images of nerve decompression outcomes. Patients' responses to Japan Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and numerical rating scales (NRS) for lumbar pain, leg pain, and leg numbness were recorded before and during follow-up. The Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were utilized to compare pre- and postoperative group variables. RESULTS: The average operation time was 33.0 min in FELD-IL and 31.7 min in FELD-TF. Seven FELD-IL cases required lamina excavation with high-speed drill bars for scar tissue dissection from the lamina. Dura injury occurred during the excavation in one case. No complication was noted in the FELD-TF group. Successful decompression of the nerve was achieved in all cases. Complete sets of JOABPEQ and NRS were obtained in 64.5% of FELD-IL and in 82.9% of FELD-TF. The mean follow-up period was 18.6 months. All the subdomain of JOABPEQ and NRS improved significantly postoperative in both groups. There was no difference regarding the improvement of scores between the procedures except NRS for lumbar pain, which was more favorable in FELD-IL. Recurrence of herniation occurred in one patient (6%) after FELD-IL and two patients (6%) after FELD-TF. CONCLUSIONS: Both FELD-IL and FELD-TF are safe and effective revision procedures for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. FELD-TF could be performed employing the same procedure as primary surgery in revisions, regardless of the previous surgical approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8356243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83562432021-08-24 Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Yoshikane, Koichi Kikuchi, Katsuhiko Izumi, Teiyu Okazaki, Ken Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after surgical treatment is at times challenging due to epidural adhesions and scar. This study aimed to review the clinical results and safety of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy via interlaminar (FELD-IL) and transforaminal (FELD-TF) approaches for revision surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 52 lumbar disc herniation revision patients (mean age, 51.8 years; male/female, 13/39), with 17 FELD-IL and 35 FELD-TF cases. Complication incidences were assessed by reviewing surgical videos and postoperative magnetic resonance images of nerve decompression outcomes. Patients' responses to Japan Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and numerical rating scales (NRS) for lumbar pain, leg pain, and leg numbness were recorded before and during follow-up. The Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were utilized to compare pre- and postoperative group variables. RESULTS: The average operation time was 33.0 min in FELD-IL and 31.7 min in FELD-TF. Seven FELD-IL cases required lamina excavation with high-speed drill bars for scar tissue dissection from the lamina. Dura injury occurred during the excavation in one case. No complication was noted in the FELD-TF group. Successful decompression of the nerve was achieved in all cases. Complete sets of JOABPEQ and NRS were obtained in 64.5% of FELD-IL and in 82.9% of FELD-TF. The mean follow-up period was 18.6 months. All the subdomain of JOABPEQ and NRS improved significantly postoperative in both groups. There was no difference regarding the improvement of scores between the procedures except NRS for lumbar pain, which was more favorable in FELD-IL. Recurrence of herniation occurred in one patient (6%) after FELD-IL and two patients (6%) after FELD-TF. CONCLUSIONS: Both FELD-IL and FELD-TF are safe and effective revision procedures for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. FELD-TF could be performed employing the same procedure as primary surgery in revisions, regardless of the previous surgical approach. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8356243/ /pubmed/34435151 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0159 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoshikane, Koichi
Kikuchi, Katsuhiko
Izumi, Teiyu
Okazaki, Ken
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
title Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
title_full Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
title_fullStr Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
title_full_unstemmed Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
title_short Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
title_sort full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study with patient-reported outcome measures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435151
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0159
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshikanekoichi fullendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudywithpatientreportedoutcomemeasures
AT kikuchikatsuhiko fullendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudywithpatientreportedoutcomemeasures
AT izumiteiyu fullendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudywithpatientreportedoutcomemeasures
AT okazakiken fullendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudywithpatientreportedoutcomemeasures