Cargando…

A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda

BACKGROUND: In 2006, Uganda adopted the Reaching Every District strategy with the goal of attaining at least 80% coverage for routine immunizations in every district. The development and utilization of health facility/district immunization microplans is the key to the strategy. A number of reports h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mafigiri, David Kaawa, Iradukunda, Constance, Atumanya, Catherine, Odie, Michael, Mancuso, Arielle, Tran, Nhan, McGrath, Janet, Luzze, Henry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00708-y
_version_ 1783736932206903296
author Mafigiri, David Kaawa
Iradukunda, Constance
Atumanya, Catherine
Odie, Michael
Mancuso, Arielle
Tran, Nhan
McGrath, Janet
Luzze, Henry
author_facet Mafigiri, David Kaawa
Iradukunda, Constance
Atumanya, Catherine
Odie, Michael
Mancuso, Arielle
Tran, Nhan
McGrath, Janet
Luzze, Henry
author_sort Mafigiri, David Kaawa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2006, Uganda adopted the Reaching Every District strategy with the goal of attaining at least 80% coverage for routine immunizations in every district. The development and utilization of health facility/district immunization microplans is the key to the strategy. A number of reports have shown suboptimal development and use of microplans in Uganda. This study explores factors associated with suboptimal development and use of microplans in two districts in Uganda to pinpoint challenges encountered during the microplanning process. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted comparing two districts: Kapchorwa, with low immunization coverage, and Luwero with high immunization coverage. Data were collected through multilevel observation of health facilities, planning sessions and planning meetings; records review of microplans, micromaps and meeting minutes; 57 interviews with health workers at the ministry level and lower-level health facility workers. Data were analysed using NVivo 8 qualitative text analysis software. Transcripts were coded, and memos and display matrices were developed to examine the process of developing and utilizing microplans, including experiences of health workers (implementers). RESULTS: Three key findings emerged from this study. First, there are significant knowledge gaps with regard to the microplanning process among health workers at all levels (community and district health facility and nationally). Limited knowledge about communities and programme catchment areas greatly hinders the planning process by limiting the ability to identify hard-to-reach areas and to prioritize areas according to need. Secondly, the microplanning tool is bulky and complex. Finally, microplanning is being implemented in the context of already overtasked health personnel who have to conduct several other activities as part of their daily routines. CONCLUSIONS: In order to achieve quality improvement as outlined in the Reaching Every District campaign, the microplanning process should be revised. Health workers’ misunderstanding and limited knowledge about the microplanning process, especially at peripheral health facilities, coupled with the complex, bulky nature of the microplanning tool, reduces the effectiveness of microplanning in improving routine immunization in Uganda. This study reveals the need to reduce the complexity of the tool and to identify ways to train and support workers in the use of the revised tool, including support in incorporating the microplanning process into their busy schedules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8356367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83563672021-08-11 A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda Mafigiri, David Kaawa Iradukunda, Constance Atumanya, Catherine Odie, Michael Mancuso, Arielle Tran, Nhan McGrath, Janet Luzze, Henry Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: In 2006, Uganda adopted the Reaching Every District strategy with the goal of attaining at least 80% coverage for routine immunizations in every district. The development and utilization of health facility/district immunization microplans is the key to the strategy. A number of reports have shown suboptimal development and use of microplans in Uganda. This study explores factors associated with suboptimal development and use of microplans in two districts in Uganda to pinpoint challenges encountered during the microplanning process. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted comparing two districts: Kapchorwa, with low immunization coverage, and Luwero with high immunization coverage. Data were collected through multilevel observation of health facilities, planning sessions and planning meetings; records review of microplans, micromaps and meeting minutes; 57 interviews with health workers at the ministry level and lower-level health facility workers. Data were analysed using NVivo 8 qualitative text analysis software. Transcripts were coded, and memos and display matrices were developed to examine the process of developing and utilizing microplans, including experiences of health workers (implementers). RESULTS: Three key findings emerged from this study. First, there are significant knowledge gaps with regard to the microplanning process among health workers at all levels (community and district health facility and nationally). Limited knowledge about communities and programme catchment areas greatly hinders the planning process by limiting the ability to identify hard-to-reach areas and to prioritize areas according to need. Secondly, the microplanning tool is bulky and complex. Finally, microplanning is being implemented in the context of already overtasked health personnel who have to conduct several other activities as part of their daily routines. CONCLUSIONS: In order to achieve quality improvement as outlined in the Reaching Every District campaign, the microplanning process should be revised. Health workers’ misunderstanding and limited knowledge about the microplanning process, especially at peripheral health facilities, coupled with the complex, bulky nature of the microplanning tool, reduces the effectiveness of microplanning in improving routine immunization in Uganda. This study reveals the need to reduce the complexity of the tool and to identify ways to train and support workers in the use of the revised tool, including support in incorporating the microplanning process into their busy schedules. BioMed Central 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8356367/ /pubmed/34380523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00708-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mafigiri, David Kaawa
Iradukunda, Constance
Atumanya, Catherine
Odie, Michael
Mancuso, Arielle
Tran, Nhan
McGrath, Janet
Luzze, Henry
A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda
title A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda
title_full A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda
title_fullStr A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda
title_short A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda
title_sort qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in uganda
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00708-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mafigiridavidkaawa aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT iradukundaconstance aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT atumanyacatherine aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT odiemichael aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT mancusoarielle aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT trannhan aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT mcgrathjanet aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT luzzehenry aqualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT mafigiridavidkaawa qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT iradukundaconstance qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT atumanyacatherine qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT odiemichael qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT mancusoarielle qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT trannhan qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT mcgrathjanet qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda
AT luzzehenry qualitativestudyofthedevelopmentandutilizationofhealthfacilitybasedimmunizationmicroplansinuganda