Cargando…

Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is offered to a wide range of structural and numerical chromosomal imbalances, with PGT- polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as the method of choice for amplifying the small DNA content achieved from the blastomere biopsy or trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aizer, Adva, Harel-Inbar, Noa, Shani, Hagit, Orvieto, Raoul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00853-6
_version_ 1783736949138259968
author Aizer, Adva
Harel-Inbar, Noa
Shani, Hagit
Orvieto, Raoul
author_facet Aizer, Adva
Harel-Inbar, Noa
Shani, Hagit
Orvieto, Raoul
author_sort Aizer, Adva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is offered to a wide range of structural and numerical chromosomal imbalances, with PGT- polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as the method of choice for amplifying the small DNA content achieved from the blastomere biopsy or trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, that might have a detrimental impact on embryonic implantation potential. Since human embryos cultured until Day-5–6 were noticed to expel cell debris/ fragments within the zona pellucida, we aimed to examine whether these cell debris/ fragments might be used for PGT, as an alternative to embryo biopsy. METHODS: Blastocysts, which their Day-3 blastomere biopsy revealed an affected embryo with single-gene defect, and following hatching leaved cell debris/fragments within the zona pellucida were analyzed. Each blastocyst and its corresponding cell debris/fragments were separated and underwent the same molecular analysis, based on multiplex PCR programs designed for haplotyping using informative microsatellites markers. The main outcome measure was the intra-embryo congruity of Day-3 blastomere biopsy and its corresponding blastocyst and cell debris/fragments. RESULTS: Fourteen affected embryos from 9 women were included. Only 8/14 (57.2%) of embryos demonstrated congruent molecular genetic results between Day-3 embryo and its corresponding blastocyst and cell debris/fragments. In additional 6/14 (42.8%) embryos, molecular results of the Day-3 embryos and their corresponding blastocysts were congruent, while the cell debris/fragments yielded no molecular diagnoses (incomplete diagnoses). CONCLUSIONS: It might be therefore concluded, that in PGT cycles, examining the cell debris/fragments on Day-4, instead of Day-3 blastomere or Day-5 TE biopsies, is feasible and might avoid embryo biopsy with its consequent detrimental effect on embryos’ implantation potential. Whenever the latter results in incomplete diagnosis, TE biopsy should be carried out on Day-5 for final genetic results. Further large well-designed studies are required to validate the aforementioned PGT platform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8356461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83564612021-08-16 Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT? Aizer, Adva Harel-Inbar, Noa Shani, Hagit Orvieto, Raoul J Ovarian Res Brief Communication BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is offered to a wide range of structural and numerical chromosomal imbalances, with PGT- polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as the method of choice for amplifying the small DNA content achieved from the blastomere biopsy or trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, that might have a detrimental impact on embryonic implantation potential. Since human embryos cultured until Day-5–6 were noticed to expel cell debris/ fragments within the zona pellucida, we aimed to examine whether these cell debris/ fragments might be used for PGT, as an alternative to embryo biopsy. METHODS: Blastocysts, which their Day-3 blastomere biopsy revealed an affected embryo with single-gene defect, and following hatching leaved cell debris/fragments within the zona pellucida were analyzed. Each blastocyst and its corresponding cell debris/fragments were separated and underwent the same molecular analysis, based on multiplex PCR programs designed for haplotyping using informative microsatellites markers. The main outcome measure was the intra-embryo congruity of Day-3 blastomere biopsy and its corresponding blastocyst and cell debris/fragments. RESULTS: Fourteen affected embryos from 9 women were included. Only 8/14 (57.2%) of embryos demonstrated congruent molecular genetic results between Day-3 embryo and its corresponding blastocyst and cell debris/fragments. In additional 6/14 (42.8%) embryos, molecular results of the Day-3 embryos and their corresponding blastocysts were congruent, while the cell debris/fragments yielded no molecular diagnoses (incomplete diagnoses). CONCLUSIONS: It might be therefore concluded, that in PGT cycles, examining the cell debris/fragments on Day-4, instead of Day-3 blastomere or Day-5 TE biopsies, is feasible and might avoid embryo biopsy with its consequent detrimental effect on embryos’ implantation potential. Whenever the latter results in incomplete diagnosis, TE biopsy should be carried out on Day-5 for final genetic results. Further large well-designed studies are required to validate the aforementioned PGT platform. BioMed Central 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8356461/ /pubmed/34380524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00853-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Aizer, Adva
Harel-Inbar, Noa
Shani, Hagit
Orvieto, Raoul
Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?
title Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?
title_full Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?
title_fullStr Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?
title_full_unstemmed Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?
title_short Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?
title_sort can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for pgt?
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00853-6
work_keys_str_mv AT aizeradva canexpelledcellsdebrisfromadevelopingembryobeusedforpgt
AT harelinbarnoa canexpelledcellsdebrisfromadevelopingembryobeusedforpgt
AT shanihagit canexpelledcellsdebrisfromadevelopingembryobeusedforpgt
AT orvietoraoul canexpelledcellsdebrisfromadevelopingembryobeusedforpgt