Cargando…
Within study comparisons and risk of bias in international development: Systematic review and critical appraisal
BACKGROUND: Many systematic reviews incorporate nonrandomised studies of effects, sometimes called quasi‐experiments or natural experiments. However, the extent to which nonrandomised studies produce unbiased effect estimates is unclear in expectation or in practice. The usual way that systematic re...
Autores principales: | Villar, Paul Fenton, Waddington, Hugh |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1027 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Can Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions Provide Unbiased Effect
Estimates? A Systematic Review of Internal Replication Studies
por: Waddington, Hugh Sharma, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review
por: Spiga, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Genomic loci susceptible to systematic sequencing bias in clinical whole genomes
por: Freeman, Timothy M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Allele balance bias identifies systematic genotyping errors and false disease associations
por: Muyas, Francesc, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Internal oligo(dT) priming introduces systematic bias in bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing count data
por: Svoboda, Marek, et al.
Publicado: (2022)