Cargando…

Pitfalls in brain age analyses

Over the past decade, there has been an abundance of research on the difference between age and age predicted using brain features, which is commonly referred to as the “brain age gap.” Researchers have identified that the brain age gap, as a linear transformation of an out‐of‐sample residual, is de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butler, Ellyn R., Chen, Andrew, Ramadan, Rabie, Le, Trang T., Ruparel, Kosha, Moore, Tyler M., Satterthwaite, Theodore D., Zhang, Fengqing, Shou, Haochang, Gur, Ruben C., Nichols, Thomas E., Shinohara, Russell T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25533
_version_ 1783737053612081152
author Butler, Ellyn R.
Chen, Andrew
Ramadan, Rabie
Le, Trang T.
Ruparel, Kosha
Moore, Tyler M.
Satterthwaite, Theodore D.
Zhang, Fengqing
Shou, Haochang
Gur, Ruben C.
Nichols, Thomas E.
Shinohara, Russell T.
author_facet Butler, Ellyn R.
Chen, Andrew
Ramadan, Rabie
Le, Trang T.
Ruparel, Kosha
Moore, Tyler M.
Satterthwaite, Theodore D.
Zhang, Fengqing
Shou, Haochang
Gur, Ruben C.
Nichols, Thomas E.
Shinohara, Russell T.
author_sort Butler, Ellyn R.
collection PubMed
description Over the past decade, there has been an abundance of research on the difference between age and age predicted using brain features, which is commonly referred to as the “brain age gap.” Researchers have identified that the brain age gap, as a linear transformation of an out‐of‐sample residual, is dependent on age. As such, any group differences on the brain age gap could simply be due to group differences on age. To mitigate the brain age gap's dependence on age, it has been proposed that age be regressed out of the brain age gap. If this modified brain age gap is treated as a corrected deviation from age, model accuracy statistics such as R (2) will be artificially inflated to the extent that it is highly improbable that an R (2) value below .85 will be obtained no matter the true model accuracy. Given the limitations of proposed brain age analyses, further theoretical work is warranted to determine the best way to quantify deviation from normality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8357007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83570072021-08-15 Pitfalls in brain age analyses Butler, Ellyn R. Chen, Andrew Ramadan, Rabie Le, Trang T. Ruparel, Kosha Moore, Tyler M. Satterthwaite, Theodore D. Zhang, Fengqing Shou, Haochang Gur, Ruben C. Nichols, Thomas E. Shinohara, Russell T. Hum Brain Mapp Technical Report Over the past decade, there has been an abundance of research on the difference between age and age predicted using brain features, which is commonly referred to as the “brain age gap.” Researchers have identified that the brain age gap, as a linear transformation of an out‐of‐sample residual, is dependent on age. As such, any group differences on the brain age gap could simply be due to group differences on age. To mitigate the brain age gap's dependence on age, it has been proposed that age be regressed out of the brain age gap. If this modified brain age gap is treated as a corrected deviation from age, model accuracy statistics such as R (2) will be artificially inflated to the extent that it is highly improbable that an R (2) value below .85 will be obtained no matter the true model accuracy. Given the limitations of proposed brain age analyses, further theoretical work is warranted to determine the best way to quantify deviation from normality. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8357007/ /pubmed/34190372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25533 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Technical Report
Butler, Ellyn R.
Chen, Andrew
Ramadan, Rabie
Le, Trang T.
Ruparel, Kosha
Moore, Tyler M.
Satterthwaite, Theodore D.
Zhang, Fengqing
Shou, Haochang
Gur, Ruben C.
Nichols, Thomas E.
Shinohara, Russell T.
Pitfalls in brain age analyses
title Pitfalls in brain age analyses
title_full Pitfalls in brain age analyses
title_fullStr Pitfalls in brain age analyses
title_full_unstemmed Pitfalls in brain age analyses
title_short Pitfalls in brain age analyses
title_sort pitfalls in brain age analyses
topic Technical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25533
work_keys_str_mv AT butlerellynr pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT chenandrew pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT ramadanrabie pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT letrangt pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT ruparelkosha pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT mooretylerm pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT satterthwaitetheodored pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT zhangfengqing pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT shouhaochang pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT gurrubenc pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT nicholsthomase pitfallsinbrainageanalyses
AT shinohararussellt pitfallsinbrainageanalyses