Cargando…

Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study

Glutamate signalling is increasingly implicated across a range of psychiatric, neurological and pain disorders. Reliable methodologies are needed to probe the glutamate system and understand glutamate dynamics in vivo. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-fMRS) is a technique that allows...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jelen, Luke A., Lythgoe, David J., Jackson, Jade B., Howard, Matthew A., Stone, James M., Egerton, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681419
_version_ 1783737105944412160
author Jelen, Luke A.
Lythgoe, David J.
Jackson, Jade B.
Howard, Matthew A.
Stone, James M.
Egerton, Alice
author_facet Jelen, Luke A.
Lythgoe, David J.
Jackson, Jade B.
Howard, Matthew A.
Stone, James M.
Egerton, Alice
author_sort Jelen, Luke A.
collection PubMed
description Glutamate signalling is increasingly implicated across a range of psychiatric, neurological and pain disorders. Reliable methodologies are needed to probe the glutamate system and understand glutamate dynamics in vivo. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-fMRS) is a technique that allows measurement of glutamatergic metabolites over time in response to task conditions including painful stimuli. In this study, 18 healthy volunteers underwent (1)H-fMRS during a pressure-pain paradigm (8 blocks of REST and 8 blocks of PAIN) across two separate sessions. During each session, estimates of glutamate + glutamine (Glx), scaled to total creatine (tCr = creatine + phosphocreatine) were determined for averaged REST and PAIN conditions within two separate regions of interest: the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsal ACC (dACC). A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance determined a significant main effect of CONDITION (p = 0.025), with higher Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST across combined sessions, in the dACC ROI only. However, increases in dACC Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST showed limited reliability and reproducibility across sessions. Future test-retest (1)H-fMRS studies should examine modified or alternative paradigms to determine more reliable methodologies to challenge the glutamate system that may then be applied in patient groups and experimental medicine studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8357306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83573062021-08-12 Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study Jelen, Luke A. Lythgoe, David J. Jackson, Jade B. Howard, Matthew A. Stone, James M. Egerton, Alice Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Glutamate signalling is increasingly implicated across a range of psychiatric, neurological and pain disorders. Reliable methodologies are needed to probe the glutamate system and understand glutamate dynamics in vivo. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-fMRS) is a technique that allows measurement of glutamatergic metabolites over time in response to task conditions including painful stimuli. In this study, 18 healthy volunteers underwent (1)H-fMRS during a pressure-pain paradigm (8 blocks of REST and 8 blocks of PAIN) across two separate sessions. During each session, estimates of glutamate + glutamine (Glx), scaled to total creatine (tCr = creatine + phosphocreatine) were determined for averaged REST and PAIN conditions within two separate regions of interest: the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsal ACC (dACC). A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance determined a significant main effect of CONDITION (p = 0.025), with higher Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST across combined sessions, in the dACC ROI only. However, increases in dACC Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST showed limited reliability and reproducibility across sessions. Future test-retest (1)H-fMRS studies should examine modified or alternative paradigms to determine more reliable methodologies to challenge the glutamate system that may then be applied in patient groups and experimental medicine studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8357306/ /pubmed/34393848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681419 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jelen, Lythgoe, Jackson, Howard, Stone and Egerton. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Jelen, Luke A.
Lythgoe, David J.
Jackson, Jade B.
Howard, Matthew A.
Stone, James M.
Egerton, Alice
Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study
title Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study
title_full Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study
title_fullStr Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study
title_full_unstemmed Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study
title_short Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study
title_sort imaging brain glx dynamics in response to pressure pain stimulation: a (1)h-fmrs study
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681419
work_keys_str_mv AT jelenlukea imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy
AT lythgoedavidj imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy
AT jacksonjadeb imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy
AT howardmatthewa imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy
AT stonejamesm imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy
AT egertonalice imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy