Cargando…
Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study
Glutamate signalling is increasingly implicated across a range of psychiatric, neurological and pain disorders. Reliable methodologies are needed to probe the glutamate system and understand glutamate dynamics in vivo. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-fMRS) is a technique that allows...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681419 |
_version_ | 1783737105944412160 |
---|---|
author | Jelen, Luke A. Lythgoe, David J. Jackson, Jade B. Howard, Matthew A. Stone, James M. Egerton, Alice |
author_facet | Jelen, Luke A. Lythgoe, David J. Jackson, Jade B. Howard, Matthew A. Stone, James M. Egerton, Alice |
author_sort | Jelen, Luke A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glutamate signalling is increasingly implicated across a range of psychiatric, neurological and pain disorders. Reliable methodologies are needed to probe the glutamate system and understand glutamate dynamics in vivo. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-fMRS) is a technique that allows measurement of glutamatergic metabolites over time in response to task conditions including painful stimuli. In this study, 18 healthy volunteers underwent (1)H-fMRS during a pressure-pain paradigm (8 blocks of REST and 8 blocks of PAIN) across two separate sessions. During each session, estimates of glutamate + glutamine (Glx), scaled to total creatine (tCr = creatine + phosphocreatine) were determined for averaged REST and PAIN conditions within two separate regions of interest: the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsal ACC (dACC). A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance determined a significant main effect of CONDITION (p = 0.025), with higher Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST across combined sessions, in the dACC ROI only. However, increases in dACC Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST showed limited reliability and reproducibility across sessions. Future test-retest (1)H-fMRS studies should examine modified or alternative paradigms to determine more reliable methodologies to challenge the glutamate system that may then be applied in patient groups and experimental medicine studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8357306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83573062021-08-12 Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study Jelen, Luke A. Lythgoe, David J. Jackson, Jade B. Howard, Matthew A. Stone, James M. Egerton, Alice Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Glutamate signalling is increasingly implicated across a range of psychiatric, neurological and pain disorders. Reliable methodologies are needed to probe the glutamate system and understand glutamate dynamics in vivo. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-fMRS) is a technique that allows measurement of glutamatergic metabolites over time in response to task conditions including painful stimuli. In this study, 18 healthy volunteers underwent (1)H-fMRS during a pressure-pain paradigm (8 blocks of REST and 8 blocks of PAIN) across two separate sessions. During each session, estimates of glutamate + glutamine (Glx), scaled to total creatine (tCr = creatine + phosphocreatine) were determined for averaged REST and PAIN conditions within two separate regions of interest: the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsal ACC (dACC). A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance determined a significant main effect of CONDITION (p = 0.025), with higher Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST across combined sessions, in the dACC ROI only. However, increases in dACC Glx/tCr during PAIN compared to REST showed limited reliability and reproducibility across sessions. Future test-retest (1)H-fMRS studies should examine modified or alternative paradigms to determine more reliable methodologies to challenge the glutamate system that may then be applied in patient groups and experimental medicine studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8357306/ /pubmed/34393848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681419 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jelen, Lythgoe, Jackson, Howard, Stone and Egerton. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Jelen, Luke A. Lythgoe, David J. Jackson, Jade B. Howard, Matthew A. Stone, James M. Egerton, Alice Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study |
title | Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study |
title_full | Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study |
title_fullStr | Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study |
title_short | Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A (1)H-fMRS Study |
title_sort | imaging brain glx dynamics in response to pressure pain stimulation: a (1)h-fmrs study |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jelenlukea imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy AT lythgoedavidj imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy AT jacksonjadeb imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy AT howardmatthewa imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy AT stonejamesm imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy AT egertonalice imagingbrainglxdynamicsinresponsetopressurepainstimulationa1hfmrsstudy |