Cargando…

Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common problem among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to a loss of quality of life. Pharmacologic treatments are in common use, but whether lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk is effecive to treat constipation among patients with pre-dial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nata, Naowanit, Suebsiripong, Supaporn, Satirapoj, Bancha, Supasyndh, Ouppatham, Chaiprasert, Amnart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393499
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S328208
_version_ 1783737122995306496
author Nata, Naowanit
Suebsiripong, Supaporn
Satirapoj, Bancha
Supasyndh, Ouppatham
Chaiprasert, Amnart
author_facet Nata, Naowanit
Suebsiripong, Supaporn
Satirapoj, Bancha
Supasyndh, Ouppatham
Chaiprasert, Amnart
author_sort Nata, Naowanit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common problem among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to a loss of quality of life. Pharmacologic treatments are in common use, but whether lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk is effecive to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD. METHODS: A study was conducted among patients with pre-dialysis CKD receiving a diagnosis of constipation by ROME IV criteria. All subjects were randomly assigned to receive either lactulose or senna plus ispaghula husk daily for 14 days. After a 7-day washout period, the patients were switched to the other substance for another 14 days. Primary outcome was complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) weekly, assessed using a stool diary after each laxative. Secondary outcome measure was the change of stool appearance using the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS). RESULTS: A total of 22 patients underwent randomization. Baseline CSBM and BSFS were 3.4 ± 1.4 and 2.3 ± 1.2 time/week, respectively. At the end of the study, the mean CSBM weekly increased in the lactulose group (mean difference 1.3 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) and the senna plus ispaghula husk group (mean difference 2.1 ± 2.1, P < 0.001) from baseline. Comparing CSBM between lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk exhibited no significant difference (95% CI −1.2 to 0.06; P = 0.276). BSFS was significantly changed after using ispaghula husk with senna, the mean ± SD of BSFS changed to 1.7 ± 1.8 (p = 0.001) and after use lactulose, the mean ± SD of BSFS changed to 1.6 ± 1.8 (p = 0.001). No significant BSFS change was observed between groups regarding stool appearance. No serious adverse event in either group was found. CONCLUSION: Lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk were similar in efficacy to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials number is TCTR20200818006. Retrospectively Registered 18 August 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8357401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83574012021-08-12 Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Nata, Naowanit Suebsiripong, Supaporn Satirapoj, Bancha Supasyndh, Ouppatham Chaiprasert, Amnart Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common problem among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to a loss of quality of life. Pharmacologic treatments are in common use, but whether lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk is effecive to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD. METHODS: A study was conducted among patients with pre-dialysis CKD receiving a diagnosis of constipation by ROME IV criteria. All subjects were randomly assigned to receive either lactulose or senna plus ispaghula husk daily for 14 days. After a 7-day washout period, the patients were switched to the other substance for another 14 days. Primary outcome was complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) weekly, assessed using a stool diary after each laxative. Secondary outcome measure was the change of stool appearance using the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS). RESULTS: A total of 22 patients underwent randomization. Baseline CSBM and BSFS were 3.4 ± 1.4 and 2.3 ± 1.2 time/week, respectively. At the end of the study, the mean CSBM weekly increased in the lactulose group (mean difference 1.3 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) and the senna plus ispaghula husk group (mean difference 2.1 ± 2.1, P < 0.001) from baseline. Comparing CSBM between lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk exhibited no significant difference (95% CI −1.2 to 0.06; P = 0.276). BSFS was significantly changed after using ispaghula husk with senna, the mean ± SD of BSFS changed to 1.7 ± 1.8 (p = 0.001) and after use lactulose, the mean ± SD of BSFS changed to 1.6 ± 1.8 (p = 0.001). No significant BSFS change was observed between groups regarding stool appearance. No serious adverse event in either group was found. CONCLUSION: Lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk were similar in efficacy to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials number is TCTR20200818006. Retrospectively Registered 18 August 2020. Dove 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8357401/ /pubmed/34393499 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S328208 Text en © 2021 Nata et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Nata, Naowanit
Suebsiripong, Supaporn
Satirapoj, Bancha
Supasyndh, Ouppatham
Chaiprasert, Amnart
Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Efficacy of Lactulose versus Senna Plus Ispaghula Husk Among Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy of lactulose versus senna plus ispaghula husk among patients with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease and constipation: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393499
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S328208
work_keys_str_mv AT natanaowanit efficacyoflactuloseversussennaplusispaghulahuskamongpatientswithpredialysischronickidneydiseaseandconstipationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suebsiripongsupaporn efficacyoflactuloseversussennaplusispaghulahuskamongpatientswithpredialysischronickidneydiseaseandconstipationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT satirapojbancha efficacyoflactuloseversussennaplusispaghulahuskamongpatientswithpredialysischronickidneydiseaseandconstipationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT supasyndhouppatham efficacyoflactuloseversussennaplusispaghulahuskamongpatientswithpredialysischronickidneydiseaseandconstipationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chaiprasertamnart efficacyoflactuloseversussennaplusispaghulahuskamongpatientswithpredialysischronickidneydiseaseandconstipationarandomizedcontrolledtrial