Cargando…

A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werner, David A. T., Grotle, Margreth, Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova, Gulati, Sasha, Nygaard, Øystein P., Salvesen, Øyvind, Ingebrigtsen, Tor, Solberg, Tore K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3
_version_ 1783737178239533056
author Werner, David A. T.
Grotle, Margreth
Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova
Gulati, Sasha
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Solberg, Tore K.
author_facet Werner, David A. T.
Grotle, Margreth
Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova
Gulati, Sasha
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Solberg, Tore K.
author_sort Werner, David A. T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential prognostic factors for previously defined cut-offs for failure and worsening on the Oswestry Disability Index scores 12 months after surgery. Since the cut-offs for failure and worsening are different for patients with low, moderate, and high baseline ODI scores, the multivariate analyses were run separately for these subgroups. Data were split into a training (70%) and a validation set (30%). The model was developed in the training set and tested in the validation set. A prediction (%) of an outcome was calculated for each patient in a risk matrix. RESULTS: The prognostic model produced six risk matrices based on three baseline ODI ranges (low, medium, and high) and two outcomes (failure and worsening), each containing 7 to 11 prognostic factors. Model discrimination and calibration were acceptable. The estimated preoperative probabilities ranged from 3 to 94% for failure and from 1 to 72% for worsening in our validation cohort. CONCLUSION: We developed a prognostic model for failure and worsening 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The model showed acceptable calibration and discrimination, and could be useful in assisting physicians and patients in clinical decision-making process prior to surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8357664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83576642021-08-30 A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery Werner, David A. T. Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein P. Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore K. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Spine degenerative OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential prognostic factors for previously defined cut-offs for failure and worsening on the Oswestry Disability Index scores 12 months after surgery. Since the cut-offs for failure and worsening are different for patients with low, moderate, and high baseline ODI scores, the multivariate analyses were run separately for these subgroups. Data were split into a training (70%) and a validation set (30%). The model was developed in the training set and tested in the validation set. A prediction (%) of an outcome was calculated for each patient in a risk matrix. RESULTS: The prognostic model produced six risk matrices based on three baseline ODI ranges (low, medium, and high) and two outcomes (failure and worsening), each containing 7 to 11 prognostic factors. Model discrimination and calibration were acceptable. The estimated preoperative probabilities ranged from 3 to 94% for failure and from 1 to 72% for worsening in our validation cohort. CONCLUSION: We developed a prognostic model for failure and worsening 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The model showed acceptable calibration and discrimination, and could be useful in assisting physicians and patients in clinical decision-making process prior to surgery. Springer Vienna 2021-07-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8357664/ /pubmed/34245366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article - Spine degenerative
Werner, David A. T.
Grotle, Margreth
Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova
Gulati, Sasha
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Salvesen, Øyvind
Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Solberg, Tore K.
A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
title A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
title_full A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
title_fullStr A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
title_short A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
title_sort prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the norwegian registry for spine surgery
topic Original Article - Spine degenerative
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wernerdavidat aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT grotlemargreth aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT smastuenmiladacvancarova aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT gulatisasha aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT nygaardøysteinp aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT salvesenøyvind aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT ingebrigtsentor aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT solbergtorek aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT wernerdavidat prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT grotlemargreth prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT smastuenmiladacvancarova prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT gulatisasha prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT nygaardøysteinp prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT salvesenøyvind prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT ingebrigtsentor prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery
AT solbergtorek prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery