Cargando…
A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 |
_version_ | 1783737178239533056 |
---|---|
author | Werner, David A. T. Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein P. Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore K. |
author_facet | Werner, David A. T. Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein P. Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore K. |
author_sort | Werner, David A. T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential prognostic factors for previously defined cut-offs for failure and worsening on the Oswestry Disability Index scores 12 months after surgery. Since the cut-offs for failure and worsening are different for patients with low, moderate, and high baseline ODI scores, the multivariate analyses were run separately for these subgroups. Data were split into a training (70%) and a validation set (30%). The model was developed in the training set and tested in the validation set. A prediction (%) of an outcome was calculated for each patient in a risk matrix. RESULTS: The prognostic model produced six risk matrices based on three baseline ODI ranges (low, medium, and high) and two outcomes (failure and worsening), each containing 7 to 11 prognostic factors. Model discrimination and calibration were acceptable. The estimated preoperative probabilities ranged from 3 to 94% for failure and from 1 to 72% for worsening in our validation cohort. CONCLUSION: We developed a prognostic model for failure and worsening 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The model showed acceptable calibration and discrimination, and could be useful in assisting physicians and patients in clinical decision-making process prior to surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8357664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83576642021-08-30 A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery Werner, David A. T. Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein P. Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore K. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Spine degenerative OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential prognostic factors for previously defined cut-offs for failure and worsening on the Oswestry Disability Index scores 12 months after surgery. Since the cut-offs for failure and worsening are different for patients with low, moderate, and high baseline ODI scores, the multivariate analyses were run separately for these subgroups. Data were split into a training (70%) and a validation set (30%). The model was developed in the training set and tested in the validation set. A prediction (%) of an outcome was calculated for each patient in a risk matrix. RESULTS: The prognostic model produced six risk matrices based on three baseline ODI ranges (low, medium, and high) and two outcomes (failure and worsening), each containing 7 to 11 prognostic factors. Model discrimination and calibration were acceptable. The estimated preoperative probabilities ranged from 3 to 94% for failure and from 1 to 72% for worsening in our validation cohort. CONCLUSION: We developed a prognostic model for failure and worsening 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The model showed acceptable calibration and discrimination, and could be useful in assisting physicians and patients in clinical decision-making process prior to surgery. Springer Vienna 2021-07-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8357664/ /pubmed/34245366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Spine degenerative Werner, David A. T. Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein P. Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore K. A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title | A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_full | A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_fullStr | A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_short | A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_sort | prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the norwegian registry for spine surgery |
topic | Original Article - Spine degenerative |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wernerdavidat aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT grotlemargreth aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT smastuenmiladacvancarova aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT gulatisasha aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT nygaardøysteinp aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT salvesenøyvind aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT ingebrigtsentor aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT solbergtorek aprognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT wernerdavidat prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT grotlemargreth prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT smastuenmiladacvancarova prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT gulatisasha prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT nygaardøysteinp prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT salvesenøyvind prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT ingebrigtsentor prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery AT solbergtorek prognosticmodelforfailureandworseningafterlumbarmicrodiscectomyamulticenterstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgery |