Cargando…
Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
The Full body illusion (FBI) is an illusion in which participants experience a change in self-location to a body that is perceived from a third-person perspective. The FBI is usually induced through experimenter generated stroking but can also be induced through self-generated stroking. In four expe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z |
_version_ | 1783737187653648384 |
---|---|
author | Swinkels, Lieke M. J. Veling, Harm Dijksterhuis, Ap van Schie, Hein T. |
author_facet | Swinkels, Lieke M. J. Veling, Harm Dijksterhuis, Ap van Schie, Hein T. |
author_sort | Swinkels, Lieke M. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Full body illusion (FBI) is an illusion in which participants experience a change in self-location to a body that is perceived from a third-person perspective. The FBI is usually induced through experimenter generated stroking but can also be induced through self-generated stroking. In four experiments (three preregistered) we compared a self-generated stroking induction condition to a self-generated movement condition, where the only difference between conditions was the presence or absence of touch. We investigated whether the illusion reflects an all-or-nothing phenomenon or whether the illusion is influenced by the availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality. As a prerequisite, we investigated whether the FBI can also be induced using just self-generated movement in the absence of synchronous touch. Illusion strength was measured through illusion statements. Participants reported an equally strong illusion for both induction methods in Experiments 1, 2 and 3. In the third experiment, we additionally measured the time of illusion onset. Like the illusion strength measures, the illusion onset times did not differ between the two induction methods. In the fourth experiment participants only completed the self-generated movement condition. Again, they reported the FBI, demonstrating that the findings of Experiments 1, 2 and 3 were not dependent on the presence of a condition that used synchronous touch. Together, these findings confirm the hypothesis that the FBI is an all-or-nothing phenomenon and that adding additional multisensory synchronicity does not help to enhance the strength, onset time or onset probability of the illusion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8357710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83577102021-08-30 Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion Swinkels, Lieke M. J. Veling, Harm Dijksterhuis, Ap van Schie, Hein T. Psychol Res Original Article The Full body illusion (FBI) is an illusion in which participants experience a change in self-location to a body that is perceived from a third-person perspective. The FBI is usually induced through experimenter generated stroking but can also be induced through self-generated stroking. In four experiments (three preregistered) we compared a self-generated stroking induction condition to a self-generated movement condition, where the only difference between conditions was the presence or absence of touch. We investigated whether the illusion reflects an all-or-nothing phenomenon or whether the illusion is influenced by the availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality. As a prerequisite, we investigated whether the FBI can also be induced using just self-generated movement in the absence of synchronous touch. Illusion strength was measured through illusion statements. Participants reported an equally strong illusion for both induction methods in Experiments 1, 2 and 3. In the third experiment, we additionally measured the time of illusion onset. Like the illusion strength measures, the illusion onset times did not differ between the two induction methods. In the fourth experiment participants only completed the self-generated movement condition. Again, they reported the FBI, demonstrating that the findings of Experiments 1, 2 and 3 were not dependent on the presence of a condition that used synchronous touch. Together, these findings confirm the hypothesis that the FBI is an all-or-nothing phenomenon and that adding additional multisensory synchronicity does not help to enhance the strength, onset time or onset probability of the illusion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8357710/ /pubmed/32719923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Swinkels, Lieke M. J. Veling, Harm Dijksterhuis, Ap van Schie, Hein T. Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion |
title | Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion |
title_full | Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion |
title_fullStr | Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion |
title_short | Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion |
title_sort | availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swinkelsliekemj availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion AT velingharm availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion AT dijksterhuisap availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion AT vanschieheint availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion |