Cargando…

Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion

The Full body illusion (FBI) is an illusion in which participants experience a change in self-location to a body that is perceived from a third-person perspective. The FBI is usually induced through experimenter generated stroking but can also be induced through self-generated stroking. In four expe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swinkels, Lieke M. J., Veling, Harm, Dijksterhuis, Ap, van Schie, Hein T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z
_version_ 1783737187653648384
author Swinkels, Lieke M. J.
Veling, Harm
Dijksterhuis, Ap
van Schie, Hein T.
author_facet Swinkels, Lieke M. J.
Veling, Harm
Dijksterhuis, Ap
van Schie, Hein T.
author_sort Swinkels, Lieke M. J.
collection PubMed
description The Full body illusion (FBI) is an illusion in which participants experience a change in self-location to a body that is perceived from a third-person perspective. The FBI is usually induced through experimenter generated stroking but can also be induced through self-generated stroking. In four experiments (three preregistered) we compared a self-generated stroking induction condition to a self-generated movement condition, where the only difference between conditions was the presence or absence of touch. We investigated whether the illusion reflects an all-or-nothing phenomenon or whether the illusion is influenced by the availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality. As a prerequisite, we investigated whether the FBI can also be induced using just self-generated movement in the absence of synchronous touch. Illusion strength was measured through illusion statements. Participants reported an equally strong illusion for both induction methods in Experiments 1, 2 and 3. In the third experiment, we additionally measured the time of illusion onset. Like the illusion strength measures, the illusion onset times did not differ between the two induction methods. In the fourth experiment participants only completed the self-generated movement condition. Again, they reported the FBI, demonstrating that the findings of Experiments 1, 2 and 3 were not dependent on the presence of a condition that used synchronous touch. Together, these findings confirm the hypothesis that the FBI is an all-or-nothing phenomenon and that adding additional multisensory synchronicity does not help to enhance the strength, onset time or onset probability of the illusion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8357710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83577102021-08-30 Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion Swinkels, Lieke M. J. Veling, Harm Dijksterhuis, Ap van Schie, Hein T. Psychol Res Original Article The Full body illusion (FBI) is an illusion in which participants experience a change in self-location to a body that is perceived from a third-person perspective. The FBI is usually induced through experimenter generated stroking but can also be induced through self-generated stroking. In four experiments (three preregistered) we compared a self-generated stroking induction condition to a self-generated movement condition, where the only difference between conditions was the presence or absence of touch. We investigated whether the illusion reflects an all-or-nothing phenomenon or whether the illusion is influenced by the availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality. As a prerequisite, we investigated whether the FBI can also be induced using just self-generated movement in the absence of synchronous touch. Illusion strength was measured through illusion statements. Participants reported an equally strong illusion for both induction methods in Experiments 1, 2 and 3. In the third experiment, we additionally measured the time of illusion onset. Like the illusion strength measures, the illusion onset times did not differ between the two induction methods. In the fourth experiment participants only completed the self-generated movement condition. Again, they reported the FBI, demonstrating that the findings of Experiments 1, 2 and 3 were not dependent on the presence of a condition that used synchronous touch. Together, these findings confirm the hypothesis that the FBI is an all-or-nothing phenomenon and that adding additional multisensory synchronicity does not help to enhance the strength, onset time or onset probability of the illusion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8357710/ /pubmed/32719923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Swinkels, Lieke M. J.
Veling, Harm
Dijksterhuis, Ap
van Schie, Hein T.
Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
title Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
title_full Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
title_fullStr Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
title_full_unstemmed Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
title_short Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
title_sort availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01396-z
work_keys_str_mv AT swinkelsliekemj availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion
AT velingharm availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion
AT dijksterhuisap availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion
AT vanschieheint availabilityofsynchronousinformationinanadditionalsensorymodalitydoesnotenhancethefullbodyillusion