Cargando…

Patient Preferences in Rare Diseases: A Qualitative Study in Neuromuscular Disorders to Inform a Quantitative Preference Study

INTRODUCTION: It has become increasingly important to include patient preference information in decision-making processes for drug development. As neuromuscular disorders represent multisystem, debilitating, and progressive rare diseases with few treatment options, this study aimed to explore unmet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jimenez-Moreno, A. Cecilia, van Overbeeke, Eline, Pinto, Cathy Anne, Smith, Ian, Sharpe, Jenny, Ormrod, James, Whichello, Chiara, de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., Bullok, Kristin, Levitan, Bennett, Huys, Isabelle, de Wit, G. Ardine, Gorman, Grainne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8357717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00482-z
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: It has become increasingly important to include patient preference information in decision-making processes for drug development. As neuromuscular disorders represent multisystem, debilitating, and progressive rare diseases with few treatment options, this study aimed to explore unmet health care needs and patient treatment preferences for two neuromuscular disorders, myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and mitochondrial myopathies (MM) to inform early stages of drug development. METHODS: Fifteen semi-structured interviews and five focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with DM1 and MM adult patients and caregivers. Topics discussed included (1) reasons for study participation; (2) disease signs/symptoms and their impact on daily lives; (3) top desired benefits; and (4) acceptability of risks and tolerance levels for a hypothetical new treatment. Data were analyzed following a thematic ‘code’ approach. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants representing a wide range of disease severities participated. ‘Muscle strength’ and ‘energy and endurance’ were the disease-related unmet needs most often mentioned. Additionally, improved ‘balance’, ‘cognition’ and ‘gut function’ were the top desired treatment benefits, while ‘damage to the liver, kidneys or eyes’ was the most concerning risk. Factors influencing their tolerance to risks related to previously having experienced the risk and differentiation between permanent and temporary risks. A few differences were elicited between patients and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study provided an open forum to elicit treatment-desired benefits and acceptable risks to be established by patients themselves. These findings can inform decisions for developing new treatments and the design of clinical trials for DM1 and MM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40271-020-00482-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.