Cargando…

eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users

We estimated the electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds (eABR THRs) in response to multi-pulses with high burst rate of 10,000 pulses-per-second (pps). Growth functions of wave eV amplitudes, root mean square (RMS) values, peak of phase-locking value (PLV), and the lowest valid d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeedi, Ali, Englert, Ludwig, Hemmert, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.705189
_version_ 1783737272022073344
author Saeedi, Ali
Englert, Ludwig
Hemmert, Werner
author_facet Saeedi, Ali
Englert, Ludwig
Hemmert, Werner
author_sort Saeedi, Ali
collection PubMed
description We estimated the electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds (eABR THRs) in response to multi-pulses with high burst rate of 10,000 pulses-per-second (pps). Growth functions of wave eV amplitudes, root mean square (RMS) values, peak of phase-locking value (PLV), and the lowest valid data point (LVDP) were calculated in 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions. The growth functions were then fitted and extrapolated with linear and exponential functions to find eABR THRs. The estimated THRs were compared to psychophysical THRs determined for multi-pulse conditions as well as to the clinical THRs measured behaviorally at the rate of 1,000 pps. The growth functions of features showed shallower growth slopes when the number of pulses increased. eABR THRs estimated in 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions were closer to the clinical THRs, when compared to 1- and 2-pulses conditions. However, the smallest difference between estimated eABR THRs and clinical THRs was not always achieved from the same number of pulses. The smallest absolute difference of 30.3 μA was found for the linear fittings on growth functions of eABR RMS values in 4-pulses condition. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (PCCs) between eABR THRs and psychophysical THRs were significant and relatively large in all but 16-pulses conditions. The PCCs between eABR THRs and clinical THRs, however, were smaller and in less cases significant. Results of this study showed that eABRs to multi-pulse stimulation could, to some extent, represent clinical stimulation paradigms, and thus in comparison to single pulses, could estimate clinical THRs with smaller errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83581262021-08-13 eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users Saeedi, Ali Englert, Ludwig Hemmert, Werner Front Neurosci Neuroscience We estimated the electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds (eABR THRs) in response to multi-pulses with high burst rate of 10,000 pulses-per-second (pps). Growth functions of wave eV amplitudes, root mean square (RMS) values, peak of phase-locking value (PLV), and the lowest valid data point (LVDP) were calculated in 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions. The growth functions were then fitted and extrapolated with linear and exponential functions to find eABR THRs. The estimated THRs were compared to psychophysical THRs determined for multi-pulse conditions as well as to the clinical THRs measured behaviorally at the rate of 1,000 pps. The growth functions of features showed shallower growth slopes when the number of pulses increased. eABR THRs estimated in 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions were closer to the clinical THRs, when compared to 1- and 2-pulses conditions. However, the smallest difference between estimated eABR THRs and clinical THRs was not always achieved from the same number of pulses. The smallest absolute difference of 30.3 μA was found for the linear fittings on growth functions of eABR RMS values in 4-pulses condition. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (PCCs) between eABR THRs and psychophysical THRs were significant and relatively large in all but 16-pulses conditions. The PCCs between eABR THRs and clinical THRs, however, were smaller and in less cases significant. Results of this study showed that eABRs to multi-pulse stimulation could, to some extent, represent clinical stimulation paradigms, and thus in comparison to single pulses, could estimate clinical THRs with smaller errors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8358126/ /pubmed/34393715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.705189 Text en Copyright © 2021 Saeedi, Englert and Hemmert. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Saeedi, Ali
Englert, Ludwig
Hemmert, Werner
eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users
title eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_short eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort eabr thr estimation using high-rate multi-pulse stimulation in cochlear implant users
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.705189
work_keys_str_mv AT saeediali eabrthrestimationusinghighratemultipulsestimulationincochlearimplantusers
AT englertludwig eabrthrestimationusinghighratemultipulsestimulationincochlearimplantusers
AT hemmertwerner eabrthrestimationusinghighratemultipulsestimulationincochlearimplantusers