Cargando…

Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand

Background: Twelve potentially modifiable risk factors (less education, hypertension, obesity, alcohol, traumatic brain injury (TBI), hearing loss, smoking, depression, physical inactivity, social isolation, diabetes, air pollution) account for an estimated 40% of worldwide dementia cases. We aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma'u, Etuini, Cullum, Sarah, Cheung, Gary, Livingston, Gill, Mukadam, Naaheed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100191
_version_ 1783737279136661504
author Ma'u, Etuini
Cullum, Sarah
Cheung, Gary
Livingston, Gill
Mukadam, Naaheed
author_facet Ma'u, Etuini
Cullum, Sarah
Cheung, Gary
Livingston, Gill
Mukadam, Naaheed
author_sort Ma'u, Etuini
collection PubMed
description Background: Twelve potentially modifiable risk factors (less education, hypertension, obesity, alcohol, traumatic brain injury (TBI), hearing loss, smoking, depression, physical inactivity, social isolation, diabetes, air pollution) account for an estimated 40% of worldwide dementia cases. We aimed to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) for dementia for the four largest New Zealand ethnic groups (European, Māori, Asian, and Pacific peoples) to identify whether optimal dementia prevention targets differed by ethnicity. Methods: We calculated risk factor prevalence for 10 risk factors using the New Zealand Health Survey 2018/19 and published reports for hearing loss and TBI prevalences. We calculated the PAF for each risk factor using calculated prevalence and relative risk estimates from previous meta-analyses. To account for risk factor overlap, we calculated communality of risk factors and a weighted PAF. Findings: The weighted PAF for dementia was 47.7% overall in New Zealand, 47.6% for Europeans, 51.4% for Māori, 50.8% for Pacific peoples, and 40.8% for Asians. Highest PAFs for Europeans were hearing loss (8%) and social isolation (5.7%), and for Asians hearing loss (7.3%) and physical inactivity (5.5%). For Māori and Pacific peoples, highest PAFs were for obesity (7.3% and 8.9% respectively) and hearing loss (6.5% and 6.6%). Interpretation: New Zealand has higher dementia prevention potential than worldwide estimates with high prevalences of untreated hearing loss and obesity. The relative contribution of individual risk factors PAFs varies by ethnic group. Public health strategies for dementia prevention need to be tailored to these differences. Funding: Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC:20/021).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83581572021-09-14 Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand Ma'u, Etuini Cullum, Sarah Cheung, Gary Livingston, Gill Mukadam, Naaheed Lancet Reg Health West Pac Research Paper Background: Twelve potentially modifiable risk factors (less education, hypertension, obesity, alcohol, traumatic brain injury (TBI), hearing loss, smoking, depression, physical inactivity, social isolation, diabetes, air pollution) account for an estimated 40% of worldwide dementia cases. We aimed to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) for dementia for the four largest New Zealand ethnic groups (European, Māori, Asian, and Pacific peoples) to identify whether optimal dementia prevention targets differed by ethnicity. Methods: We calculated risk factor prevalence for 10 risk factors using the New Zealand Health Survey 2018/19 and published reports for hearing loss and TBI prevalences. We calculated the PAF for each risk factor using calculated prevalence and relative risk estimates from previous meta-analyses. To account for risk factor overlap, we calculated communality of risk factors and a weighted PAF. Findings: The weighted PAF for dementia was 47.7% overall in New Zealand, 47.6% for Europeans, 51.4% for Māori, 50.8% for Pacific peoples, and 40.8% for Asians. Highest PAFs for Europeans were hearing loss (8%) and social isolation (5.7%), and for Asians hearing loss (7.3%) and physical inactivity (5.5%). For Māori and Pacific peoples, highest PAFs were for obesity (7.3% and 8.9% respectively) and hearing loss (6.5% and 6.6%). Interpretation: New Zealand has higher dementia prevention potential than worldwide estimates with high prevalences of untreated hearing loss and obesity. The relative contribution of individual risk factors PAFs varies by ethnic group. Public health strategies for dementia prevention need to be tailored to these differences. Funding: Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC:20/021). Elsevier 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8358157/ /pubmed/34527984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100191 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ma'u, Etuini
Cullum, Sarah
Cheung, Gary
Livingston, Gill
Mukadam, Naaheed
Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
title Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
title_full Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
title_fullStr Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
title_short Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand
title_sort differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: a cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in new zealand
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100191
work_keys_str_mv AT mauetuini differencesinthepotentialfordementiapreventionbetweenmajorethnicgroupswithinonecountryacrosssectionalanalysisofpopulationattributablefractionofpotentiallymodifiableriskfactorsinnewzealand
AT cullumsarah differencesinthepotentialfordementiapreventionbetweenmajorethnicgroupswithinonecountryacrosssectionalanalysisofpopulationattributablefractionofpotentiallymodifiableriskfactorsinnewzealand
AT cheunggary differencesinthepotentialfordementiapreventionbetweenmajorethnicgroupswithinonecountryacrosssectionalanalysisofpopulationattributablefractionofpotentiallymodifiableriskfactorsinnewzealand
AT livingstongill differencesinthepotentialfordementiapreventionbetweenmajorethnicgroupswithinonecountryacrosssectionalanalysisofpopulationattributablefractionofpotentiallymodifiableriskfactorsinnewzealand
AT mukadamnaaheed differencesinthepotentialfordementiapreventionbetweenmajorethnicgroupswithinonecountryacrosssectionalanalysisofpopulationattributablefractionofpotentiallymodifiableriskfactorsinnewzealand