Cargando…

Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers

BACKGROUND: The windmill softball pitch is a dynamic sporting movement that places softball pitchers at high risk of injury. Unlike baseball, there is limited research into the mechanical differences between softball pitchers of varying skill levels. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasserberger, Kyle W., Friesen, Kenzie B., Downs, Jessica L., Bordelon, Nicole M., Oliver, Gretchen D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211021826
_version_ 1783737359427174400
author Wasserberger, Kyle W.
Friesen, Kenzie B.
Downs, Jessica L.
Bordelon, Nicole M.
Oliver, Gretchen D.
author_facet Wasserberger, Kyle W.
Friesen, Kenzie B.
Downs, Jessica L.
Bordelon, Nicole M.
Oliver, Gretchen D.
author_sort Wasserberger, Kyle W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The windmill softball pitch is a dynamic sporting movement that places softball pitchers at high risk of injury. Unlike baseball, there is limited research into the mechanical differences between softball pitchers of varying skill levels. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare pelvis and trunk kinematics between youth and collegiate softball pitchers. It was hypothesized that there would be significant differences in pelvis and trunk kinematics between these 2 groups. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: The pelvic and trunk kinematics of 90 softball pitchers were collected during full-effort pitching using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. Participants were grouped based on their age at the time of data collection (35 youth [mean age, 11 ± 1 years]; 55 collegiate [mean age, 20 ± 2 years]). We compared between-group differences in pelvic posterior tilt, lateral tilt, axial rotation, and axial rotation velocity as well as trunk extension, lateral flexion, axial rotation, and axial rotation velocity during the pitching phase between start of pitch and ball release (BR) using 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping. Statistical significance was determined using Holmes-Šidák stepdown correction–adjusted P values (P ′). RESULTS: Compared with youth pitchers, collegiate pitchers exhibited a more posteriorly tilted pelvis from the moment of start of pitch until 94% of the way between start of pitch and BR (P ′ = .002) and a more laterally flexed trunk toward the glove side from the moment of start of pitch until 71% of the way between start of pitch and BR (P ′ = .010). CONCLUSION: Collegiate pitchers displayed a more posteriorly tilted pelvis and more laterally flexed trunk toward the glove side during the windmill pitching motion when compared with youth pitchers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings add to the growing body of softball research and help elucidate mechanical differences between youth and collegiate softball pitchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83585242021-08-13 Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers Wasserberger, Kyle W. Friesen, Kenzie B. Downs, Jessica L. Bordelon, Nicole M. Oliver, Gretchen D. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The windmill softball pitch is a dynamic sporting movement that places softball pitchers at high risk of injury. Unlike baseball, there is limited research into the mechanical differences between softball pitchers of varying skill levels. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare pelvis and trunk kinematics between youth and collegiate softball pitchers. It was hypothesized that there would be significant differences in pelvis and trunk kinematics between these 2 groups. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: The pelvic and trunk kinematics of 90 softball pitchers were collected during full-effort pitching using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. Participants were grouped based on their age at the time of data collection (35 youth [mean age, 11 ± 1 years]; 55 collegiate [mean age, 20 ± 2 years]). We compared between-group differences in pelvic posterior tilt, lateral tilt, axial rotation, and axial rotation velocity as well as trunk extension, lateral flexion, axial rotation, and axial rotation velocity during the pitching phase between start of pitch and ball release (BR) using 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping. Statistical significance was determined using Holmes-Šidák stepdown correction–adjusted P values (P ′). RESULTS: Compared with youth pitchers, collegiate pitchers exhibited a more posteriorly tilted pelvis from the moment of start of pitch until 94% of the way between start of pitch and BR (P ′ = .002) and a more laterally flexed trunk toward the glove side from the moment of start of pitch until 71% of the way between start of pitch and BR (P ′ = .010). CONCLUSION: Collegiate pitchers displayed a more posteriorly tilted pelvis and more laterally flexed trunk toward the glove side during the windmill pitching motion when compared with youth pitchers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings add to the growing body of softball research and help elucidate mechanical differences between youth and collegiate softball pitchers. SAGE Publications 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8358524/ /pubmed/34395686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211021826 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Wasserberger, Kyle W.
Friesen, Kenzie B.
Downs, Jessica L.
Bordelon, Nicole M.
Oliver, Gretchen D.
Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers
title Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers
title_full Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers
title_fullStr Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers
title_short Comparison of Pelvis and Trunk Kinematics Between Youth and Collegiate Windmill Softball Pitchers
title_sort comparison of pelvis and trunk kinematics between youth and collegiate windmill softball pitchers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211021826
work_keys_str_mv AT wasserbergerkylew comparisonofpelvisandtrunkkinematicsbetweenyouthandcollegiatewindmillsoftballpitchers
AT friesenkenzieb comparisonofpelvisandtrunkkinematicsbetweenyouthandcollegiatewindmillsoftballpitchers
AT downsjessical comparisonofpelvisandtrunkkinematicsbetweenyouthandcollegiatewindmillsoftballpitchers
AT bordelonnicolem comparisonofpelvisandtrunkkinematicsbetweenyouthandcollegiatewindmillsoftballpitchers
AT olivergretchend comparisonofpelvisandtrunkkinematicsbetweenyouthandcollegiatewindmillsoftballpitchers