Cargando…

Should we be Royal?

OBJECTIVE: Our college name The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and Crest (Coat of Arms) are echoes of our colonial past, which create a barrier to an inclusive 21st-century Australasian psychiatry. Two hundred and fifty years after European settlement, this articl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kealy-Bateman, Warren, Nash, Louise, Shields, Robyn, Ouliaris, Calina, McGorry, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856221992648
_version_ 1783737368697634816
author Kealy-Bateman, Warren
Nash, Louise
Shields, Robyn
Ouliaris, Calina
McGorry, Patrick
author_facet Kealy-Bateman, Warren
Nash, Louise
Shields, Robyn
Ouliaris, Calina
McGorry, Patrick
author_sort Kealy-Bateman, Warren
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our college name The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and Crest (Coat of Arms) are echoes of our colonial past, which create a barrier to an inclusive 21st-century Australasian psychiatry. Two hundred and fifty years after European settlement, this article reviews the colonial legacy, the evolution of the college and the process by which the prefix ‘Royal’ came to be attached. This is now an anachronism that symbolically undermines our mission to create a fully inclusive psychiatry for all Australians and New Zealanders, from indigenous people across the spectrum of cultures drawn from recent migrations within our complex multicultural society. CONCLUSION: As psychiatrists, it is time to modernise and reinvent the college name and Crest. We will be a healthier and more inclusive community of practice without the ‘Royal’ prefix, and with a new symbol for our college that embodies our values and vision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83585642021-08-13 Should we be Royal? Kealy-Bateman, Warren Nash, Louise Shields, Robyn Ouliaris, Calina McGorry, Patrick Australas Psychiatry Ethics OBJECTIVE: Our college name The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and Crest (Coat of Arms) are echoes of our colonial past, which create a barrier to an inclusive 21st-century Australasian psychiatry. Two hundred and fifty years after European settlement, this article reviews the colonial legacy, the evolution of the college and the process by which the prefix ‘Royal’ came to be attached. This is now an anachronism that symbolically undermines our mission to create a fully inclusive psychiatry for all Australians and New Zealanders, from indigenous people across the spectrum of cultures drawn from recent migrations within our complex multicultural society. CONCLUSION: As psychiatrists, it is time to modernise and reinvent the college name and Crest. We will be a healthier and more inclusive community of practice without the ‘Royal’ prefix, and with a new symbol for our college that embodies our values and vision. SAGE Publications 2021-02-24 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8358564/ /pubmed/33626310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856221992648 Text en © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Ethics
Kealy-Bateman, Warren
Nash, Louise
Shields, Robyn
Ouliaris, Calina
McGorry, Patrick
Should we be Royal?
title Should we be Royal?
title_full Should we be Royal?
title_fullStr Should we be Royal?
title_full_unstemmed Should we be Royal?
title_short Should we be Royal?
title_sort should we be royal?
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856221992648
work_keys_str_mv AT kealybatemanwarren shouldweberoyal
AT nashlouise shouldweberoyal
AT shieldsrobyn shouldweberoyal
AT ouliariscalina shouldweberoyal
AT mcgorrypatrick shouldweberoyal