Cargando…
Should we be Royal?
OBJECTIVE: Our college name The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and Crest (Coat of Arms) are echoes of our colonial past, which create a barrier to an inclusive 21st-century Australasian psychiatry. Two hundred and fifty years after European settlement, this articl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856221992648 |
_version_ | 1783737368697634816 |
---|---|
author | Kealy-Bateman, Warren Nash, Louise Shields, Robyn Ouliaris, Calina McGorry, Patrick |
author_facet | Kealy-Bateman, Warren Nash, Louise Shields, Robyn Ouliaris, Calina McGorry, Patrick |
author_sort | Kealy-Bateman, Warren |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Our college name The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and Crest (Coat of Arms) are echoes of our colonial past, which create a barrier to an inclusive 21st-century Australasian psychiatry. Two hundred and fifty years after European settlement, this article reviews the colonial legacy, the evolution of the college and the process by which the prefix ‘Royal’ came to be attached. This is now an anachronism that symbolically undermines our mission to create a fully inclusive psychiatry for all Australians and New Zealanders, from indigenous people across the spectrum of cultures drawn from recent migrations within our complex multicultural society. CONCLUSION: As psychiatrists, it is time to modernise and reinvent the college name and Crest. We will be a healthier and more inclusive community of practice without the ‘Royal’ prefix, and with a new symbol for our college that embodies our values and vision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8358564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83585642021-08-13 Should we be Royal? Kealy-Bateman, Warren Nash, Louise Shields, Robyn Ouliaris, Calina McGorry, Patrick Australas Psychiatry Ethics OBJECTIVE: Our college name The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and Crest (Coat of Arms) are echoes of our colonial past, which create a barrier to an inclusive 21st-century Australasian psychiatry. Two hundred and fifty years after European settlement, this article reviews the colonial legacy, the evolution of the college and the process by which the prefix ‘Royal’ came to be attached. This is now an anachronism that symbolically undermines our mission to create a fully inclusive psychiatry for all Australians and New Zealanders, from indigenous people across the spectrum of cultures drawn from recent migrations within our complex multicultural society. CONCLUSION: As psychiatrists, it is time to modernise and reinvent the college name and Crest. We will be a healthier and more inclusive community of practice without the ‘Royal’ prefix, and with a new symbol for our college that embodies our values and vision. SAGE Publications 2021-02-24 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8358564/ /pubmed/33626310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856221992648 Text en © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Ethics Kealy-Bateman, Warren Nash, Louise Shields, Robyn Ouliaris, Calina McGorry, Patrick Should we be Royal? |
title | Should we be Royal? |
title_full | Should we be Royal? |
title_fullStr | Should we be Royal? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should we be Royal? |
title_short | Should we be Royal? |
title_sort | should we be royal? |
topic | Ethics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856221992648 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kealybatemanwarren shouldweberoyal AT nashlouise shouldweberoyal AT shieldsrobyn shouldweberoyal AT ouliariscalina shouldweberoyal AT mcgorrypatrick shouldweberoyal |